KLINEDINST PC 501 West Broapway, SuITe 600 SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92101 Case} 2:12-cv-08333-ODW-JC Document 113-1 Filed 04/11/13 Page1of10 Page ID #:2687 | || Heather L. Rosing, Bar No. 183986 David M. Majchrzak, Bar No. 220860 2 || Philip W. Vineyard, Bar No. 233628 KLINEDINST PC 3 || 501 West Broadway, Suite 600 San Diego, California 92101 (619) 239-813 1/FAX (619) 238-8707 hrosing@klinedinstlaw.com dmajchrzak@klinedinstlaw.com 4 5 6 Sp tg & S age Oat peer for PAUL DUFFY, ANGELA VAN DEN 7 || HEMEL, and PRENDA LAW, INC. 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 0 11 || INGENUITY 13 LLC, Case No. 2:12-cv-8333-ODW(JCx) 12 Plaintiff, Related Cases: 2:12-cv-05709-ODW-JC fs 2:12-cv-08322-ODW-JC Vv. | | DECLARATION OF PHILIP W. 14 |) JOHN DOE, VINEYARD IN SUPPORT OF PRENDA LAW’S, PAUL DUFFY’S, 15 Defendant. AND ANGELA VAN DEN HEMEL’S OBJECTION TO REQUEST OF 16 PUTATIVE JOHN DOE TO FILE A _ REPLY BRIEF Judge: Hon. Otis D. Wright, I] 18 Magistrate Judge: | Hon. Jacqueline Chooljian | Courtroom: 1] 19 Complaint Filed: September 27, 2012 20 Trial Date: None set 21 I, Philip W. Vineyard, declare as follows: Ze l. I am over the age of 18 years and an associate with the law firm 23 || Klinedinst P.C., counsel of record for Prenda Law, Inc., Paul Duffy, and Angela 24 || Van Den Hemel. I am a member in good standing with the California State Bar 25 || and admitted to practice in all of the State’s courts, as well as in the federal courts 26 || for the Central and Northern Districts of the State of California. 27 2. I have personal knowledge of the following facts and, if called upon 28 || as a witness, could competently testify thereto, except as to those matters which are eke DECLARATION OF PHILIP W. VINEYARD IN SUPPORT OF OBJECTION TO REQUEST OF PUTATIVE JOHN DOE TO FILE A REPLY BRIEF 2:12-CV-8333-ODW (JCx) KLINEDINST PC 501 West Broapway, Sulte 600 SAN DieGo, CALIFORNIA 92101 Case|2:12-cv-08333-ODW-JC Document 113-1 Filed 04/11/13 Page 2of10 Page ID #:2688 l explicitly set forth as based upon my information and belief and, as to such 2 |) matters, 1 am informed and believe that they are true and correct. 3. Attached hereto as Exhibit A are true and correct copies of print-outs that I made of the website “pietzlawfirm.com” on April 10, 2013. | 4. I have contacted Brent Berry twice to discuss his declaration and accompanying exhibits that were filed in support of my clients’ Response to Order 3 4 5 6 7 || to Show Cause Why Sanctions Should Not Be Levied. The purposes of my calls 8 || were to confirm the authenticity of the declaration and exhibits prior to filing the 9 || documents, to instruct Mr. Berry not to delete the texts that were attached as Q || exhibits to his declaration, and to arrange for a computer forensics engineer to 11 || preserve the texts and maintain a chain of custody for same. I have further 12 || contacted the aforementioned forensics engineer to schedule a date on which he 13 || may obtain Mr. Berry’s phone to perform the preservation and chain of evidence 14 |} functions and anticipate those functions will be completed in the next week. 16 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of 17 || America that the foregoing is true and correct. 18 Executed the 11th day of April 2013 at Los Angeles, California. 15511878v1 ae DECLARATION OF PHILIP W. VINEYARD IN SUPPORT OF OBJECTION TO REQUEST OF PUTATIVE JOHN DOE TO FILE A REPLY BRIEF cad om, OM FE oe oe We Case 2:12-cv-08333-ODW-JC Document 113-1 Filed 04/11/13 Page 3of10 Page ID #:2689 EXHIBIT A COPIES OF PRINT-OUTS FROM WEBSITE “PIETZLAWFIRM.COM ON APRIL 10, 2013 TO DECLARATION OF PHILIP W. VINEYARD IN SUPPORT OF OBJECTION TO REQUEST OF PUTATIVE JOHN DOE TO FILE A REPLY BRIEF LitiGatgon2 Fitertainee38 © SpvrthCiln@beunabPrakset LAvedrOPiet/LawPame 4 of 10 Page IDf 3 #:2690 unt Jd uss THE PIETZ : LEADING Advocacy ~ * Home + About * Atlomeys * Offices * Blawg * Mahbu Media Lawsuit Welcome to PietzLawFirm.com The Pietz Law Firm is dedicated to providing LEADING Advocacy™., a concept that defines not just whar we do, but also How we do It: Litigation — copyright, trademark, entertainment and business litigation. Entertainment & Sports ~ representation of talent, athletes, and related talent-side media and management companies. Antitrust & Unfair Competition — under both California and federal law. Domain Names ~— including Uniform Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy (“UDRP”) proceedings, as well as cybersquatting issues. Intellectual Property — special focus on copyright, trademark, trade secrets, including licensing, software and technology, business and product name issues, CO-existence agreements, litigation and advice, subpoena defense and copyright troll lawsuits. New Media — counsel to a wide variety of cutting-edge new media companies that operate at the intersection of entertamment and technology. General Business - assistance in all manner of standard corporate transactions, including the formation of business entities such as corporations and LiLC’s, licensing issues, and acting as an outside general counsel to smaller businesses. =a »* ¥ A, - ux 7 Oe oe Cus i 2 se # ) * * = - : | tee ==. '- | Lee -— asmneam) ‘ so | i rl 5 ” ash i a 2 ~, j ” => , - a - - j Es — ee ro a ' Copyright Lawsuit Cases ° Copyright “Troll” infringement Cases @ AQ lloldings. LLC + Prenda Law Subpoenas m Guava. LIC + Prenda Law w LW Systems Copyright Lawsuit + Prenda law @ Malibu Media lawsuit @ Patrick Collins, inc. w Jiucd Degree Films ¢ Warner Bros. Subpoena, Wamer Brothers Copyright Infringement http://pietzlawfirm.com/ 4/10/2013 LitiGatsen2 HRertai8838 © Prywr3CinBlbounadhrakse Levee OFitwW/1awPage 5 0f 10 Rage It 3 #:2691 - Recent Blawg Posts ° | W Systems v. Christopher. lan County Ulmois 13-1.-0018 o Malibu Media Southern District of California (S.D. Cal.) ~ Excalpatury Evidence Letters and Single Delendant Cases > Excellent New Decision for Sing Hubbard ~ St.Cl Ex i New | le Does and John Doe No. | e Update on Ingenuity [3 in Central District of California e Third Deg * Archives e March 201 ° January 201 4 ° December 2012 ¢ November 2012 raeasanpepancucus, e October 2012 Li ° Junge 20 Rea SEER ete Tere April 26011 mAb a + To search, type and hit e1 * Useful Resources “Re, nn A ° A Primer on Slaving the Copyright Troll: Help, | Got.a Letter trom my ISP Seeking to Subpoena My Idenuty Because a Copynght Troll A second Pri mer Subpoena Defense 201 ° California Busimess Entity Search Copyrivht Reeistranion — ECO earch ~ USPTO ° US. Supreme Court Decisions a bes. an ts ar Poa ~_ a) £*,; Pane peor, of oe - Legal Sites of Interest ° Deadline Holivood Daily Manhattan Beach The Pietz Law Firm 3770 Highland Avenue, Suite 206 Manhattan Beach, CA 90266 Contact Telephone: (310) 424-5557 Facsimile: (310) 546-5301 info@pietziawlinn com http://pietzlawfirm.com/ 4/10/2013 L iti Gam 2EnPecmiOR@ABAOSNOHIC ntbloeumbAtdkIel L&ilect OF/At/L3w Page 6 of 10 Pageipf 3 #:2692 Beverly Fills The Pietz Law Firm 9454 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 500 Beverly Hills, CA 90212 | egal Notices | Privacy Pelicy | © 2011 The Pietz Law Firm. All Rights Reserved. This website is an attorney communication. http://pietzlawfirm.com/ 4/10/2013 I 2 x /\ pistes ead Ing@asty 2:3,a-b608B83daDYwJIC Document 113-1 Filed 04/11/13 Page 7of10 Page |Ipf4 #:2693 * Home * About * Allomeys ¢ Offices * Blawe | LEADING Advocacy ™ * Malibu Media Lawsuit Ingenuity 13, LLC + Prenda Law This summer, Prenda Law, Inc. and its attorneys John Steele and Brett Gibbs have been busy filing lawsuits in California on behalf of Ingenuity 13, LLC jaa Bae oe Ingenuity [3 is the latest plaintiff Prenda is using to orchestrate its national campaign to coerce copyright “settlements” from ISP subscribers who may or may not have actually downloaded any of plaintiff's movies. In a departure from prior practice, Prenda has been filing these lawsuits against single John Does. That means these cases will likely be harder to resolve because plaintiff will likely be seeking a higher settlement value (passing the cost on to the defendant) and there is one less procedural problem with the case. However, clients in these cases still have options. If you have received a letter from your ISP regarding an Ingenuity 13 subpoena, or if you have been contacted by an Ingenuity 13 representative directly, please contact The Pietz Law Firm. Here is a list of Ingenuity 13, LLC cases as of October 19, 2012: case title Ingenuity 13 LLC v. John Doe Ingenuity!13 LLC v. John Doe Ingenuity 13 LLC v. John Doe Ingenuity!13 LLC v. John Doe Ingenuity 13 LLC v. John Doe Ingenuity13 LLC v. John Doe Ingenuity 13 LLC v. John Doe Ingenuity 13 LLC v. John Doe Ingenuity 13 LLC v. John Doe Ingenuity 13 LLC v. John Doe Ingenuity 13 LLC v, John Doe Ingenuity 13 LLC v. John Doe Ingenuity 13 LLC v John Doe Ingenuity 13 LLC v, John Doe Ingenuity 13 LLC v. Doe Ingenuity 13 LLC v. Doe Ingenuity 13 LLC v. Doe http://pietzlawfirm.com/copyright/ingenuity- 1 3-Ile-prenda-law/ case no 2:20 12-cv- 06635 2:2012-cv- 06660 2:2012-cv- 06662 2:20)2-cv- 06668 2:20 12-cv- 06664 2:2012-cv- 06666 2:20 12-cv- 07404 2:20 12-cv- 07408 2:2012-cv- 07410 2:20 12-cv- 07385 2:20 12-cv- 07386 2:2012-cv- 08326 2:2012-cv- 08332 2:2012-cv- 08327 3:2012-cv- 04976 §:2012-cv- 04979 3:20 12-cv- 0498 | court_id cacdce cacdce cacdce cacdce cacdce cacdce cacdce cacdce cacdce cacdce cacdce cacdce cacdce cacdce candce candce candce 4/10/2013 Ing@ase 2312-4¢-68388d@DAWIC Document 113-1 Filed 04/11/13 Page 8of10 Page4pt4 Ingenuity 13 LLC vy. Doe Ingenuity 13 LLC v. Doe Ingenuity 13 LLC v. Doe Ingenuity 13 LLC v. Doe Ingenuity 13 LLC v. John Doe Ingenuity 13 LLC v. John Doe Ingenuity 13 LLC v. John Doe Ingenuity 13 LLC v. John Doe Ingenuity 13 LLC v. John Doe Ingenuity 13 LLC v. John Doe Ingenuity 13 LLC v. John Doe Ingenuity 13 LLC v. John Doe Ingenuity 13 LLC v. John Doe Ingenuity 13 LLC v. John Doe Ingenuity 13 LLC v. John Doe Ingenuity 13, LLC v. Doe INGENUITY 13, LLC v. DOE Ingenuity 13, LLC v. Doe Ingenuity 13 LLC v. John Doe Ingenuity 13 LLC v. John Doe Ingenuity 13 LLC v. Doe Ingenuity 13 LLC v, Doe Ingenuity 13 LLC v. Doe Ingenuity 13 LLC v. Doe Ingenuity 13 LLC v. Doe =" te s >= ae = mele ftit! 5:20 12-cv- 04980 3:20 12-cv- 04977 4:20 12-cv- 04978 8:2012-cv- 01690 2:20 12-cv- 08334 2:2012-ev- 08330 2:201]2-cv- 08336 2:20 12-cv- 08328 2:2012-cv- 08324 2:20]2-cv- 08322 2:2012-cv- 08331 1:20 12-cv- 04225 1:2012-cv- 06129 1:2012-cv- 06131 1:20 12-cv~- 07943 1:20 12-cv- 22756 1:2012-cv- 22754 2:20 12-cv- 00520 2:201]2-cv- 08329 2:20 12-cv- 08323 3:20 12-cv- 04217 3:20 12-cv- 04216 §:2012-cv- 04445 3:2012-cv- 04449 3:20 12-cv- 04450 { =— 3 | candce candce candce flmdce cacdce cacdce cacdce cacdce cacdce cacdce cacdce ilndce ilIndce ilndce iIndce tlsdce filsdce vaedce cacdce cacdce candce candce candce candce candce a ‘T | a th * —_= mf h + Copyright Lawsuit Cases © Copyricht “Proll” Infringement Cases http://pietzlawfirm.com/copyright/ingenuity- 13-llc-prenda-law/ eae 7) #:2694 f ; 4/10/2013 C Document 113-1 Filed 04/11/13 Page 9of10 Page Hof 4 #:2695 mw Lightspeed Media Corporation + Prenda Law Eon pga ce aS EA A AR ee At he ce eRe Rl ee Sn e M He ARN RR AN Yt ERY Narn PN Systems Copyright Lawsuit + Prenda Law farstiee traits eh Malibu Media Lawsuit mw [hird Deeree Films ° Warner Bros. Subpoena Warner Brothers Copyright Infringement apenas ns + Recent Blawg Posts nd Single Delendant Cases Semin present SUM A IAN LUE ALI EN EAT NIELS OPE RONAN LE DEL NACI PEAT IEAM RSA EUAN IAAEL Gata LUIS ant tl tL EHDA PEPE ONE A OEM I Hop ES A ESTEE TTT TINT YEO TOE UNE EY A TRIE POLIS E ERS R YU RV OLE ELENA GUT NEN GERRY E EOL EU een ev ee re rer ee NEON TMNT TENE TE TYNE VENTE ETT ER VET ETE ERI Te? Q Leoradd Ri a Oe e> sewers peeeen Co ~— Fae ra cS wet af” See all Cy ey wed ann, ay pevad _ yon, = pa oy. a] 12 oe 1 ane! for > We on ~~ pau) t. on sant ee tact prone: Neal” C aate eh ee ferry Update on Ingenuity 13 in Central District of Califormia ° Third Degree Films v. Does 1-178 ~N.D. Cal. No. 3:20 12-cv-03838 2 2 Seen pw | «+ Archives © April 2013 © March 2013 Sarr ana na pa ° December 2012 ° November 2012 ° October 2012 September 2012 e August 2012 ¢ May 2012 ° June 2011 o May 2011 ermnntintinrng ran a pars = bewes, ‘ ~ os eed panwrh . nae! aan hidaxtaamdniehaceantiane * To search, type and hit e! ¢ Useful Resources ° A Primer on Slaying the Copyright Troll: Help. | Gota Letter from my ISP Seeking to Subpoena My Identity Because a Copyright Troll Wants to Sue me for Copyrieht Infringement ~~ What do | do? ° California Business Entity Search. ° Copyright Remistration — ECO - Legal Sites of Interest © Deadline Hollvood Daily ° dietrolidie. com ° FightCopyright | rolls.com e SCOTUSBiog — Supreme Court Blog TTABlog Ma rane a Py tt ety Minter ee o Manhattan Beach The Pietz Law Firm 3770 Highland Avenue, Suite 206 Manhattan Beach, CA 90266 Contact Telephone: (310) 424-5557 http://pietzlawfirm.com/copyright/ingenuity- 13-Ilc-prenda-law/ 4/10/2013 Ingiasety? 12 -cvO8aaerdbDWdwC Document 113-1 Filed 04/11/13 Page10o0f10 Page4dlaf 4 #:2696 Facsimile: (310) 546-536] info: pietzlawiinn com Beverly Hills The Pietz Law Firm 9454 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 500 Beverly Hills, CA 90212 http://pietzlawfirm.com/copyright/ingenuity- 1 3-llc-prenda-law/ 4/10/2013