KLINEDINST PC 501 West Broapway, SuITe 600 SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92101

Case} 2:12-cv-08333-ODW-JC Document 113-1 Filed 04/11/13 Page1of10 Page ID #:2687

| || Heather L. Rosing, Bar No. 183986 David M. Majchrzak, Bar No. 220860

2 || Philip W. Vineyard, Bar No. 233628 KLINEDINST PC

3 || 501 West Broadway, Suite 600 San Diego, California 92101 (619) 239-813 1/FAX (619) 238-8707 hrosing@klinedinstlaw.com dmajchrzak@klinedinstlaw.com

4 5 6 Sp tg & S age Oat peer for PAUL DUFFY, ANGELA VAN DEN 7 || HEMEL, and PRENDA LAW, INC. 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 0

11 || INGENUITY 13 LLC, Case No. 2:12-cv-8333-ODW(JCx)

12 Plaintiff, Related Cases: 2:12-cv-05709-ODW-JC

fs 2:12-cv-08322-ODW-JC

Vv. | | DECLARATION OF PHILIP W.

14 |) JOHN DOE, VINEYARD IN SUPPORT OF PRENDA LAW’S, PAUL DUFFY’S,

15 Defendant. AND ANGELA VAN DEN HEMEL’S OBJECTION TO REQUEST OF

16 PUTATIVE JOHN DOE TO FILE A

_ REPLY BRIEF Judge: Hon. Otis D. Wright, I]

18 Magistrate Judge: | Hon. Jacqueline Chooljian

| Courtroom: 1]

19 Complaint Filed: September 27, 2012

20 Trial Date: None set

21 I, Philip W. Vineyard, declare as follows:

Ze l. I am over the age of 18 years and an associate with the law firm

23 || Klinedinst P.C., counsel of record for Prenda Law, Inc., Paul Duffy, and Angela 24 || Van Den Hemel. I am a member in good standing with the California State Bar 25 || and admitted to practice in all of the State’s courts, as well as in the federal courts 26 || for the Central and Northern Districts of the State of California.

27 2. I have personal knowledge of the following facts and, if called upon

28 || as a witness, could competently testify thereto, except as to those matters which are eke

DECLARATION OF PHILIP W. VINEYARD IN SUPPORT OF OBJECTION TO REQUEST OF PUTATIVE JOHN DOE TO FILE A REPLY BRIEF 2:12-CV-8333-ODW (JCx)

KLINEDINST PC

501 West Broapway, Sulte 600 SAN DieGo, CALIFORNIA 92101

Case|2:12-cv-08333-ODW-JC Document 113-1 Filed 04/11/13 Page 2of10 Page ID #:2688

l explicitly set forth as based upon my information and belief and, as to such 2 |) matters, 1 am informed and believe that they are true and correct. 3. Attached hereto as Exhibit A are true and correct copies of print-outs that I made of the website “pietzlawfirm.com” on April 10, 2013. | 4. I have contacted Brent Berry twice to discuss his declaration and

accompanying exhibits that were filed in support of my clients’ Response to Order

7 || to Show Cause Why Sanctions Should Not Be Levied. The purposes of my calls 8 || were to confirm the authenticity of the declaration and exhibits prior to filing the 9 || documents, to instruct Mr. Berry not to delete the texts that were attached as

Q || exhibits to his declaration, and to arrange for a computer forensics engineer to

11 || preserve the texts and maintain a chain of custody for same. I have further

12 || contacted the aforementioned forensics engineer to schedule a date on which he 13 || may obtain Mr. Berry’s phone to perform the preservation and chain of evidence

14 |} functions and anticipate those functions will be completed in the next week.

16 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of 17 || America that the foregoing is true and correct.

18 Executed the 11th day of April 2013 at Los Angeles, California.

15511878v1

DECLARATION OF PHILIP W. VINEYARD IN SUPPORT OF OBJECTION TO REQUEST OF PUTATIVE JOHN DOE TO FILE A REPLY BRIEF

cad om, OM FE oe oe We

Case 2:12-cv-08333-ODW-JC Document 113-1 Filed 04/11/13 Page 3of10 Page ID #:2689

EXHIBIT A

COPIES OF PRINT-OUTS FROM WEBSITE “PIETZLAWFIRM.COM ON APRIL 10, 2013 TO DECLARATION OF PHILIP W. VINEYARD IN

SUPPORT OF OBJECTION TO REQUEST OF PUTATIVE JOHN DOE TO FILE A REPLY BRIEF

LitiGatgon2 Fitertainee38 © SpvrthCiln@beunabPrakset LAvedrOPiet/LawPame 4 of 10 Page IDf 3 #:2690

unt Jd uss THE PIETZ :

LEADING Advocacy ~

* Home

+ About

* Atlomeys

* Offices

* Blawg

* Mahbu Media Lawsuit

Welcome to PietzLawFirm.com

The Pietz Law Firm is dedicated to providing LEADING Advocacy™., a concept that defines not just whar we do, but also How we do It:

Litigation — copyright, trademark, entertainment and business litigation.

Entertainment & Sports ~ representation of talent, athletes, and related talent-side media and management companies.

Antitrust & Unfair Competition — under both California and federal law.

Domain Names ~— including Uniform Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy (“UDRP”) proceedings, as well as cybersquatting issues.

Intellectual Property — special focus on copyright, trademark, trade secrets, including licensing, software and technology, business and product name issues, CO-existence agreements, litigation and advice, subpoena defense and copyright troll lawsuits.

New Media — counsel to a wide variety of cutting-edge new media companies that operate at the intersection of entertamment and technology.

General Business - assistance in all manner of standard corporate transactions, including the formation of business entities such as corporations and LiLC’s, licensing issues, and acting as an outside general counsel to smaller businesses.

»* ¥ A, - ux 7 Oe oe Cus i 2 se # )

* *

= - :

| tee ==. '-

| Lee

-—

asmneam)

‘ so | i

rl 5 ”

ash i

2 ~, j ” => , - a - - j Es — ee ro a '

° Copyright “Troll” infringement Cases @ AQ lloldings. LLC + Prenda Law Subpoenas m Guava. LIC + Prenda Law

w LW Systems Copyright Lawsuit + Prenda law @ Malibu Media lawsuit @ Patrick Collins, inc. w Jiucd Degree Films ¢ Warner Bros. Subpoena, Wamer Brothers Copyright Infringement

http://pietzlawfirm.com/ 4/10/2013

LitiGatsen2 HRertai8838 © Prywr3CinBlbounadhrakse Levee OFitwW/1awPage 5 0f 10 Rage It 3 #:2691

- Recent Blawg Posts

° | W Systems v. Christopher. lan County Ulmois 13-1.-0018 o Malibu Media Southern District of California (S.D. Cal.) ~ Excalpatury Evidence Letters and Single Delendant Cases > Excellent New Decision for Sing

Hubbard ~ St.Cl

Ex i New | le Does and John Doe No. | e Update on Ingenuity [3 in Central District of California

e Third Deg * Archives

e March 201

° January 201 4

° December 2012

¢ November 2012

raeasanpepancucus,

e October 2012

° Junge 20

Rea SEER ete Tere

April 26011

mAb

+ To search, type and hit e1

* Useful Resources

“Re, nn A ° A Primer on Slaving the Copyright Troll: Help, | Got.a Letter trom my ISP Seeking to Subpoena My Idenuty Because a Copynght Troll

A second Pri mer Subpoena Defense 201 ° California Busimess Entity Search Copyrivht Reeistranion — ECO earch ~ USPTO

° US. Supreme Court Decisions

a bes. an ts ar Poa ~_ a) £*,; Pane peor, of oe

- Legal Sites of Interest

° Deadline Holivood Daily

Manhattan Beach The Pietz Law Firm 3770 Highland Avenue, Suite 206

Manhattan Beach, CA 90266 Contact Telephone: (310) 424-5557 Facsimile: (310) 546-5301

info@pietziawlinn com

http://pietzlawfirm.com/ 4/10/2013

L iti Gam 2EnPecmiOR@ABAOSNOHIC ntbloeumbAtdkIel L&ilect OF/At/L3w Page 6 of 10 Pageipf 3 #:2692

Beverly Fills The Pietz Law Firm 9454 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 500

Beverly Hills, CA 90212

http://pietzlawfirm.com/ 4/10/2013

I 2 x

pistes ead

Ing@asty 2:3,a-b608B83daDYwJIC Document 113-1 Filed 04/11/13 Page 7of10 Page |Ipf4 #:2693

* Home

* About

* Allomeys ¢ Offices

* Blawe

| LEADING Advocacy ™

* Malibu Media Lawsuit

Ingenuity 13, LLC + Prenda Law

This summer, Prenda Law, Inc. and its attorneys John Steele and Brett Gibbs have been busy filing lawsuits in California on behalf of Ingenuity 13,

LLC jaa Bae oe

Ingenuity [3 is the latest plaintiff Prenda is using to orchestrate its national campaign to coerce copyright “settlements” from ISP subscribers who may or may not have actually downloaded any of plaintiff's movies.

In a departure from prior practice, Prenda has been filing these lawsuits against single John Does. That means these cases will likely be harder to resolve because plaintiff will likely be seeking a higher settlement value (passing the cost on to the defendant) and there is one less procedural problem with the case. However, clients in these cases still have options.

If you have received a letter from your ISP regarding an Ingenuity 13 subpoena, or if you have been contacted by an Ingenuity 13 representative directly, please contact The Pietz Law Firm.

Here is a list of Ingenuity 13, LLC cases as of October 19, 2012:

case title Ingenuity 13 LLC v. John Doe Ingenuity!13 LLC v. John Doe Ingenuity 13 LLC v. John Doe Ingenuity!13 LLC v. John Doe Ingenuity 13 LLC v. John Doe Ingenuity13 LLC v. John Doe

Ingenuity 13 LLC v. John Doe

Ingenuity 13 LLC v. John Doe Ingenuity 13 LLC v. John Doe Ingenuity 13 LLC v, John Doe

Ingenuity 13 LLC v. John Doe Ingenuity 13 LLC v John Doe Ingenuity 13 LLC v, John Doe Ingenuity 13 LLC v. Doe

Ingenuity 13 LLC v. Doe

http://pietzlawfirm.com/copyright/ingenuity- 1 3-Ile-prenda-law/

case no 2:20 12-cv- 06635 2:2012-cv- 06660 2:2012-cv- 06662 2:20)2-cv- 06668 2:20 12-cv- 06664 2:2012-cv- 06666 2:20 12-cv- 07404 2:20 12-cv- 07408 2:2012-cv- 07410 2:20 12-cv- 07385 2:20 12-cv- 07386 2:2012-cv- 08326 2:2012-cv- 08332 2:2012-cv- 08327 3:2012-cv- 04976 §:2012-cv- 04979 3:20 12-cv- 0498 |

court_id

cacdce cacdce cacdce cacdce cacdce cacdce cacdce cacdce cacdce cacdce cacdce cacdce cacdce cacdce candce candce

candce

4/10/2013

Ing@ase 2312-4¢-68388d@DAWIC Document 113-1 Filed 04/11/13 Page 8of10 Page4pt4

Ingenuity 13 LLC vy. Doe

Ingenuity 13 LLC v. Doe

Ingenuity 13 LLC v. John Doe Ingenuity 13 LLC v. John Doe Ingenuity 13 LLC v. John Doe Ingenuity 13 LLC v. John Doe

Ingenuity 13 LLC v. John Doe

Ingenuity 13 LLC v. John Doe Ingenuity 13 LLC v. John Doe Ingenuity 13 LLC v. John Doe

Ingenuity 13 LLC v. John Doe Ingenuity 13 LLC v. John Doe Ingenuity 13, LLC v. Doe

INGENUITY 13, LLC

v. DOE

Ingenuity 13, LLC v. Doe Ingenuity 13 LLC v. John Doe

Ingenuity 13 LLC v. John Doe

Ingenuity 13 LLC v. Doe

Ingenuity 13 LLC v, Doe Ingenuity 13 LLC v. Doe Ingenuity 13 LLC v. Doe Ingenuity 13 LLC v. Doe

=" te s >=

ae =

mele ftit!

5:20 12-cv- 04980 3:20 12-cv- 04977 4:20 12-cv- 04978 8:2012-cv- 01690 2:20 12-cv- 08334 2:2012-ev- 08330 2:201]2-cv- 08336 2:20 12-cv- 08328 2:2012-cv- 08324 2:20]2-cv- 08322 2:2012-cv- 08331 1:20 12-cv- 04225 1:2012-cv- 06129 1:2012-cv- 06131 1:20 12-cv~- 07943 1:20 12-cv- 22756 1:2012-cv- 22754 2:20 12-cv- 00520 2:201]2-cv- 08329 2:20 12-cv- 08323 3:20 12-cv- 04217 3:20 12-cv- 04216 §:2012-cv- 04445 3:2012-cv- 04449 3:20 12-cv- 04450

{ =—

3 |

candce

candce candce flmdce cacdce cacdce cacdce cacdce cacdce cacdce cacdce ilndce

ilIndce

ilndce

iIndce

tlsdce

filsdce

vaedce cacdce cacdce candce candce candce candce

candce

a ‘T | a th *

—_= mf h

+ Copyright Lawsuit Cases

http://pietzlawfirm.com/copyright/ingenuity- 13-llc-prenda-law/

eae

#:2694

f ;

4/10/2013

C Document 113-1 Filed 04/11/13 Page 9of10 Page Hof 4 #:2695

mw Lightspeed Media Corporation + Prenda Law

Eon pga ce aS EA A AR ee At he ce eRe Rl ee Sn e M He ARN RR AN Yt ERY Narn PN

Systems Copyright Lawsuit + Prenda Law

farstiee traits eh Malibu Media Lawsuit mw [hird Deeree Films ° Warner Bros. Subpoena Warner Brothers Copyright Infringement

apenas ns

+ Recent Blawg Posts

nd Single Delendant Cases

Semin present SUM A IAN LUE ALI EN EAT NIELS OPE RONAN LE DEL NACI PEAT IEAM RSA EUAN IAAEL Gata LUIS ant tl tL EHDA PEPE ONE A OEM I Hop ES A ESTEE TTT TINT YEO TOE UNE EY A TRIE POLIS E ERS R YU RV OLE ELENA GUT NEN GERRY E EOL EU een ev ee re rer ee NEON TMNT TENE TE TYNE VENTE ETT ER VET ETE ERI Te?

Q Leoradd Ri a Oe e> sewers peeeen Co ~— Fae ra cS wet af” See all Cy ey wed ann, ay pevad _ yon, = pa oy. a] 12 oe

1 ane! for > We on ~~ pau) t. on sant ee tact prone: Neal” C aate eh ee ferry

Update on Ingenuity 13 in Central District of Califormia ° Third Degree Films v. Does 1-178 ~N.D. Cal. No. 3:20 12-cv-03838

2 Seen pw

«+ Archives

Sarr ana na pa

° December 2012 ° November 2012 ° October 2012

September 2012

e August 2012

¢ May 2012

° June 2011

o May 2011

ermnntintinrng ran

a pars = bewes, ‘ ~ os eed panwrh

. nae! aan hidaxtaamdniehaceantiane

* To search, type and hit e!

¢ Useful Resources

° A Primer on Slaying the Copyright Troll: Help. | Gota Letter from my ISP Seeking to Subpoena My Identity Because a Copyright Troll

Wants to Sue me for Copyrieht Infringement ~~ What do | do?

° California Business Entity Search. ° Copyright Remistration — ECO

- Legal Sites of Interest

° dietrolidie. com

° FightCopyright | rolls.com

e SCOTUSBiog — Supreme Court Blog TTABlog

Ma rane a Py tt ety Minter ee

Manhattan Beach The Pietz Law Firm 3770 Highland Avenue, Suite 206

Manhattan Beach, CA 90266 Contact

Telephone: (310) 424-5557