Case 2112-cv-08333-ODW-JC Document 121 Filed 04/18/13 Pagei1of2 Page ID #:2821

Oo want nun ff WwW NY

10

PHILLIP A. BAKER, BAR ID #169571 baker@bknlawyers.com ANIEL P. LEONARD, BAR ID #194268 dleonard @bknlawyers.com. DERRICK S. LOWE, BAR ID #267998 dlowe @bknlawyers.com BAKER, KEE ER & NAHRA, LLP 633 West 5” Street Suite 5400 Los Angeles, California 90071 Telephone: (213) 241-0900 Facsimile: (213) 241-0990

Specially A ing f PAUL HANSMEIER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA INGENUITY 13 LLC, Case No.: 2:12-CV-8333-ODW (JCx)

Plaintiff, Judge: Hon. Otis D. Wright, II Magistrate Judge:

VS. Hon. Jacqueline Chooljian Courtroom:

JOHN DOE, Complaint Filed: 09-27-2012 Trial Date: None Set

JOINDER TO PAUL DUFFY, ANGELA VAN DEN HEMEL, AND PRENDA LAW, INC’S RESPONSE TO PUTATIVE JOHN DOE’S REPLY BRIEF

Defendant.

COMES NOW, Specially Appearing Paul Hansmeier (“Hansmeier’’), who hereby joins the Response to Putative John Doe Reply Brief (“Reply Brief’) submitted by Prenda Law Group, Paul Duffy and Angela Van Den Hemel.

In addition, Hansmeier points out to the Court that the only “evidence” presented in the Reply Brief that purports to implicate Hansmeier is, in fact, pure speculation. The Putative John Doe makes much of the fact that “metadata”

contained in certain documents submitted in the case indicates that the documents

1

JOINDER TO PAUL DUFFY, ANGELA VAN DEN HEMEL, AND PRENDA LAW,

INC’S RESPONSE TO PUTATIVE JOHN DOE’S REPLY BRIEF

Case 2112-cv-08333-ODW-JC Document 121 Filed 04/18/13 Page 2 of2 Page ID #:2822

Oo want nun ff Wo NY

10

were accessed at some point by a person using the identifier: “Paul”. Reply at 6. There is no information as to the length of time that “Paul” spent on the document or, indeed, whether “Paul” drafted or modified the document. The Putative John Doe is inviting this Court to speculate that the “Paul” in the metadata is Paul Hansmeier. On the other hand, there is solid evidence before this Court showing that Mr. Gibbs was responsible for the filings in this case, as in all California cases, as he asserted in the declaration he filed in Florida which is attached to

Hansmeier’s Response to Order to Show Cause.

DATED: April 18, 2013 BAKER, KEENER & NAHRA, LLP

By /S/ PHILLIP A. BAKER PHILLIP A. BAKER DANIEL P. LEONARD

P ae ee S. oe

ecia earing for PAUL HANSMEI

2

JOINDER TO PAUL DUFFY, ANGELA VAN DEN HEMEL, AND PRENDA LAW,

INC’S RESPONSE TO PUTATIVE JOHN DOE’S REPLY BRIEF