Case 2:12-cv-08333-ODW-JC Document 54-1 Filed 02/20/13 Page 1lof9 Page ID #:970 EXHIBIT 1 to the Declaration of Bart Huffman Exhibit 1 Exhibits to the Declaration of Bart Huffman Page 1 Case 2:12-cv-08333-ODW-JC Document 54-1 CT Corporation Filed 02/20/13 Page 20f9 Page ID #:971 Service of Process Transmittal 07/12/2012 CT Log Number 520846725 TO: Jit M Calatiore - Rm 3A233G ATET Corp. One ATRT Way- Bedminster, NJ 07921- RE: Process Served in Hingis FOR: SBC Internet Services, Inc. (Domestic State: CA) ENGLOSED ARE COPIES GF LEGAL PROCESS REGEIVED BY THE STATUTORY AGENT OF THE ABOVE COMPANY AS FOLLOWS: TITLE OF ACTION: BOCUMENT(S) SERVED: COURT/AGENCY: NATURE OF ACTION: ON WHOM PROCESS WAS SERVED: DATE AND HOUR OF SERVICE: JURISDICTION SERVED: APPEARANCE OR ANSWER DUE: ATTORNEY(S) / SENDER(S): ACTION ITEMS: SIGHED: PER: ARRBRESS: TELEPHONE: AF Holdings LLC, Pitf. vs. John Doe, Dft. // To: SBC Internet Services, inc., etc. Letter, Order, Subpoena, Attachment(s) Northern District of (linois - U.S. District Court - Eastern Division, JL Case # 212CV05725J PWJEM Subpoena - Business records - Pertaining to the IP Address: 75,.38.25.176 (2042-03-27 17:38:08) C T Corporation System, Chicage, IL By Process Server on 07/12/2012 at 11:30 lGinois 08/15/2015 at 10:00 a.m. Paut Duffy Prenda Law, inc. 161 .N. Ciark St. Suite 3200 Chicago, IL 60601 418-325-5900 CT has retained the current log, Retain Date: 07/12/2012, Expected Purge Date: 97/17/2012 Image SOP Emaii Notification, Jili M Calafiore - Rm 3A233G jcalafiore@att.cam C T Corporation System Thad DiBartela 208 South LaSalle Street Suite 814 Chicago, IL 60604 312-345-4336 Page tof 1/ JA Information displayed cn this transmittal is for CT Corporation's record keeping purposes only and is provided © the recipient for quick reference, This Information does sot constitute a legal epinion as to the nature of action, the arnount of damages, the answer date, or any information contained in the documents themselves. Recipient is responsible for inlerpreting said documents and for taking appropriate action, Signatures on certified mail receipts confirm receipt af package anly, not contents. Exhibit 1 Exhibits to the Declaration of Bart Huffman Page 2 Case 2:12-cv-08333-ODW-JC Document 54-1 Filed 02/20/13 Page 30f9 Page ID #:972 ‘ enda Law.. Protecting Inrellecrual Property July 12, 2012 Via Hand Delivery Re: AF Holdings LLC v. John Doe 2:12-cv-05725-JEW-JEM Dear Custodian of Records: Enclosed, please find a subpoena and attachment issued in the above-referenced matter, which is currently pending in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Specifically, our client is requesting identifying information with respect to subscriber(s) who were associated with IP addresses controlled by your organization at a given date and time. In our subpoena, we have included the IP address, Time, and Time Zone in our search requests. We regularly receive requests from Internet Service Providers for electronic copies of the enclosed documents, which we are pleased to fulfill. To receive these documents please e-mail your request to our office at the following e-mail address: subpoena@wefightpiracy.com If you have any other questions or concerns regarding this request please direct them to the above e-mail address or feel free to call our offices directly at (415) 325-5900. We will do everything in our power to minimize the burden imposed on your organization associated with our request. Sincerely, Preada Law Due, Subpoena “eam Fax: 312.893.5677 161 N Clark St., Suite 3200, Chicago, IL 60601 Tel: 312.880.9160 www.wefightpiracy.com Exhibit 1 Exhibits to the Declaration of Bart Huffman Page 3 Case 2:12-cv-08333-ODW-JC Document 54-1 Filed 02/20/13 Page 4of9 Page ID #:973 Cage 2:12-cv-05725-JFW-JEM Document7 Filed 07/11/12 Page 1of3 Page ID #:97 et Brett L. Gibbs, Esq. (SBN 251000) Of Counsel to Prenda Law Inc. 2 1138 Miller Avenue, #263 Mill Valley, CA 94941 3 11415-325-5900 blgibbs@wefightpiracy.com 4 Attorney for Plaintiff 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 8 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 4 AF HOLDINGS LLC, Case No. 2:12-cv-05725-JFW-JEM D Plaintiff, Vv. [por oers ORDER GRANTING ie LAINTIFF’S EX PARTE JOHN DOE, APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO i" TAKE EXPEDITED DISCOVERY Defendant. 15 16 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR LEAVE 17 TO TAKE EXPEDITED DISCOVERY 18 : : : sa: Bice The Court has reviewed the Complaint with attached Exhibits, Plaintiff's Ex 19 se Parte Application for Leave to Take Expedited Discovery and all the papers filed in 1 connection with the motion, and relevant case law. Accordingly, it is hereby 22 ORDERED that Plaintiff's Ex Parte Application for Leave to Take Discovery is 23 || GRANTED;; it is further 24 ORDERED that Plaintiff may immediately serve Rule 45 subpoena(s) to 7 identify John Doe associated with Internet Protocol (“IP”) address listed in the ‘ Complaint, limited to the following categories of entities and information: 28 Exhibit 1 Exhibits to the Declaration of Bart Huffman Page 4 Case 2:12-cv-08333-ODW-JC Document 54-1 Filed 02/20/13 Page5of9 Page ID #:974 Cate 2:12-cv-05725-JFW-JEM Document7 Filed 07/11/12 Page 2o0f3 Page ID #:98 i From Internet Service Provider (ISP) identified in Plaintiffs Ex Parte : Application for Leave to Take Expedited Discovery and any other entity : identified as a provider of Internet services to John Doe in response to a subpoena or as a result of ongoing BitTorrent activity monitoring: 6 information sufficient to identify John Doe associated with IP address ., listed in the Complaint, including name, current (and permanent) address, 8 telephone number, e-mail address, and Media Access Control address; it is further “ ORDERED any information disclosed to the Plaintiff in response to a Rule 45 , subpoena may be used by the Plaintiff solely for the purpose of protecting Plaintiff's 13 rights as set forth in its Complaint; it is further 14 ORDERED that Plaintiff and any entity which receives a subpoena shall confer, 15 \lif necessary, with respect to the issue of payment for the information requested in the subpoena or for resolution of IP addresses which are not controlled by such entity, duplicate IP addresses that resolve to the same individual, other IP addresses that do not provide the name and other information requested of a unique individual, or for 20 the entity’s internal costs to notify its customers; it is further 24 ORDERED that any entity which receives a subpoena and elects to charge for 22 ||the costs of production shall provide a billing summary and any cost reports that serve 23 |las a basis for such billing summary and any costs claimed by such entity; it is further . ORDERED that Plaintiff shall serve a copy of this Order along with any a5 subpoenas issued pursuant to this Order; it is further 28 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR EXPEDITED DISCOVERY No. 2:12-cv-05725-JFW-JEM Exhibit 1 Exhibits to the Declaration of Bart Huffman Page 5 Case 2:12-cv-08333-ODW-JC Document 54-1 Filed 02/20/13 Page 6of9 Page ID #:975 Cake 2:12-cv-05725-JFW-JEM Document7 Filed 07/11/12 Page 30f3 Page ID #:99 I ORDERED that if any entity subpoenaed pursuant to this Order wishes to move * Ito quash the subpoena, it must do so before the return date of the subpoena, which 3 shall be 30 days from the date of service; 4 Finally, it is ORDERED that the subpoenaed entity shall preserve any 6 || Subpoenaed information pending the resolution of any timely-filed motion to quash; 9 = 10 DATED: July 11, 2012 ‘ : Wdenc \ ited States Magistrate Judge 3 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR EXPEDITED DISCOVERY __ No. 2:12-cv-05725-JF W-JEM Exhibit 1 Exhibits to the Declaration of Bart Huffman Page 6 Case 2:12-cv-08333-ODW-JC Document 54-1 Filed 02/20/13 Page 7 of 9 Page ID #:976 AO 88B (Rev. 06/09) Subpocna to Produce Documents, Information, or Objects or to Permit Inspection of Premises in a Civil Action UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the Northern District of Hlinois AF HOLDINGS LLC ) Plaintiff ) Vv. ) Civil Action No, 2:12-cv-05725-JFW-JEM JOHN DOE ) a a ) (if the action is pending in another district, state where: Defendant ) Central District of California ) SUBPOENA TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS, INFORMATION, OR OBJECTS OR TO PERMIT INSPECTION OF PREMISES IN A CIVIL ACTION To: Subpoena Compliance/Custodian of Records: SBC Internet Services, Inc. d/b/a AT&T Internet Services c/o C T Corporation System; 208 S. LaSalle St. Ste. 814, Chicago, iL 60604-1101. & Production: YOU ARE COMMANDED to produce at the time, date, and place set forth below the following documents, electronically stored information, or objects, and permit their inspection, copying, testing, or sampling of the material: In accordance with the conditions in the attached order, provide the name, current (and permanent) addresses, telephone numbers, e-mail addresses and Media Access Control addresses of all persons whose IP addresses are listed in the attached spreadsheet. We will be pleased to provide data to you in the most effective format if you let us know what your preferred format is. Place: Brande Law inc. Date and Time: 161 N Clark St. Suite 3200 : Chicago, IL 60601 08/15/2012 10:00 am GO Inspection of Premises: YOU ARE COMMANDED to permit entry onto the designated premises, land, or other property possessed or controlled by you at the time, date, and location set forth below, so that the requesting party may inspect, measure, survey, photograph, test, or sample the property or any designated object or operation on it. Place: ~~ [Date and Time: The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(c), relating to your protection as a person subject to a subpoena, and Rule 45 (d) and (e), relating to your duty to respond to this subpoena and the potential consequences of not doing so, are attached. Date: 07/12/2012 __ CLERK OF COURT fl GY Mp, OR Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk Attorney's signature The name, address, e-mail, and telephone number of the attorney representing (name of party) AF Holdings, LLC , who issues or requests this subpoena, are: Paul Duffy, Prenda Law, Inc.; 161 N. Clark St. Suite 3200, Chicago IL 60601; paduffy@wefightpiracy.com; (415) 325-5900 Exhibit 1 Exhibits to the Declaration of Bart Huffman Page 7 Case 2:12-cv-08333-ODW-JC Document 54-1 Filed 02/20/13 Page SUBPOENA ATTACHMENT The times listed below are in Coordinated Universal Time (UTC) Date/Time (UTC) 2012-03-27 17:38:08 IP Address 75.38.25.176 8o0f9 Page ID #:977 Exhibit 1 Exhibits to the Declaration of Bart Huffman Page 8 Case 2:12-cv-08333-ODW-JC Document 54-1 Filed 02/20/13 Page 9of9 Page ID #:978 a . AO 88B (Rev. 06/09) Subpoena to Produce Documents, Information, or Objects or to Permit Inspection of Premises in a Civil Action(Page 3) Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45 (c), (d), and (e) (Effective 12/1/07) (c) Protecting a Person Subject to a Subpoena. (1) Avoiding Undue Burden or Expense; Sanctions. A party or attorney responsible for issuing and serving a subpoena mus\ take reasonable steps to avoid imposing undue burden or expense on a person subject to the subpoena. The issuing court must enforce this duty and impose an appropriate sanction -—— which may include lost earnings and reasonable attorney’s fecs — on a party or attorney who fails to comply. (2) Command to Produce Materials or Permit Inspection. (A) Appearance Not Required. A person commanded to produce documents, electronically stored information, or tangible things, or to permit the inspection of premises, need not appear in person at the place of production or inspection unless also commanded to appear for a deposition, hearing, or trial. (B) Objections. A person commanded to produce documents or tangible things or to permit inspection may serve on the party or attorney designated in the subpoena a written objection to inspecting, copying. testing or sampling any or all of the materials or {o inspecting the premises — or to producing electronically stored information in the form or forms requested. The objection must be served before the earlier of the time specified for compliance or 14 days after the subpoena is served. If an objection is made, the following rules apply: (i) At any time, on notice to the commanded person, the serving party may move the issuing court for an order compelling production or inspection. (ii) These acts may be required only as directed in the order, and the order must protect a person who is neither a party nor a party’s officer from significant expense resulting from compliance. (3) Quashing or Modifying a Subpoena. (A) When Required. On timely motion, the issuing court must quash or modify a subpoena that: (i) fails to allow a reasonable time to comply; (ii) requires a person who is neither a party nor a party’s officer to travel more than 100 miles from where that person resides, is employed, or regularly transacts business in person — except that, subject to Rule 45(c)(3)(B)(iii), the person may be commanded to attend a trial by traveling from any such place within the state where the trial is held; (iii) requires disclosure of privileged or other protected matter, if no exception or waiver applies; or (iv) subjects a person to undue burden, (B) When Permitted. To protect a person subject to or affected by a subpoena, the issuing court may, on motion, quash or modify the subpoena if it requires: (i) disclosing a trade secret or other confidential research, development, or commercial information: (ii) disclosing an unretained expert’s opinion or information that does not describe specific occurrences in dispute and results from the expert’s study that was not requested by a party; or (iii) a person who is neither a party nor a party’s officer to incur substantial expense to travel more than 100 miles to attend trial. (C) Specifving Conditions as an Alternative. In the circumstances described in Rule 45(c)(3)(B), the court may, instead of quashing or modifying a subpoena, order appearance or production under specified conditions if the serving party: (i) shows a substantial need for the testimony or material that cannot be otherwise met without undue hardship; and (ii) ensures that the subpoenaed person will be reasonably compensated. (d) Duties in Responding to a Subpoena. (1) Producing Documents or Electronically Stored Information. These procedures apply to producing documents or electronically stored information: {A) Documents. A person responding to a subpoena to produce documents must produce them as they are kept in the ordinary course of business or must organize and label them to correspond to the categories in the demand. (B) Form for Producing Electronically Stored Information Not Specified. If a subpoena does not specify a form for producing electronically stored information, the person responding must produce it in a form or forms in which it is ordinarily maintained or in a reasonably usable form or forms. (C) Electronically Stored Information Produced in Only One Form. The person responding need not produce the same electronically stored information in more than one form. (D) Inaccessible Electronically Stored Information. The person responding need not provide discovery of electronically stored information from sources that the person identifies as not reasonably accessible because of undue burden or cost. On motion to compel discovery or for a protective order, the person responding must show that the information is not reasonably accessible because of undue burden or cost. If that showing is made, the court may nonetheless order discovery from such sources if the requesting party shows good cause, considering the limitations of Rule 26(b)(2)(C). The court may specify conditions for the discovery. (2) Claiming Privilege or Protection. (A) Information Withheld. A person withholding subpoenaed information under a claim that it is privileged or subject to protection as trial-preparation material must: (i) expressly make the claim; and (ii) describe the nature of the withheld documents, communications, or tangible things in a manner that, without revealing information itself privileged or protected, will enable the parties to assess the claim. (B) Information Produced. \f information produced in response to a subpoena is subject to a claim of privilege or of protection as trial- preparation material, the person making the claim may notify any party that received the information of the claim and the basis for it. After being notified, a party must promptly retum, sequester, or destroy the specified information and any copies it has; must not use or disclose the information until the claim is resolved; must take reasonable steps to retrieve the information if the party disclosed it before being notified; and may promptly present the information to the court under seal for a determination of the claim. The person who produced the information must preserve the information until the claim is resolved. (e) Contempt. The issuing court may hold in contempt a person who, having been served, fails without adequate excuse to obey the subpoena. A nonparty’s failure to obey must be excused if the subpoena purports to require the nonparty to attend or produce at a place outside the limits of Rule 45(c)(3){A)(ii). Exhibit 1 Exhibits to the Declaration of Bart Huffman Page 9