Case 2:12-cv-08333-ODW-JC Document 69-2 Filed 03/06/13 Page1of104 Page ID #:1593

EXHIBIT B

2:12-cv-08333-ODW-JC Document 69-2 Filed 03/06/13 Page 2of104 Page ID

Ca / ) #:1594

f

Nicholas Ranallo, Attorney at Law #275016

: 371 Dogwood Way 2 || Boulder Creek, CA 95006 Telephone No.: (831) 703 - 4011 3 || Pax No.: (831) 533-5073 4 || Email: nick@ranallolawoffice.com Attorney for Defendant Joe Navasca 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 AF HOLDINGS, LLC., Case No. 3:12-cv-02396-EMC 11 Plaintiff, 12 NOTICE OF DEPOSITION OF AF v. HOLDINGS, LLC 13 JOE NAVASCA Date: February 19, 2013 14 Time: 10:00 a.m. 15 Defendants. Location: 223 Bush Street 16 16° Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 17 18 19 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(b)(6), Defendant Joe

20 || Navasca shall take the deposition upon oral examination of AF Holdings, LLC., at the Premier

21 || Business Center, Standard Oil Building, 225 Bush Street, 16" Floor, in San Francisco, California, 22 || 94104, commencing at 10:00 a.m. on February 19, 2013. The deposition shall continue from day 23 || to day thereafter until completed. The deposition will be conducted under oath and transcribed by 24 || stenographic means. AF Holdings will be examined upon the topics described in Section A,

25 |} below, ahd is required to designate and produce one or more officers, directors, managing agents, 26 || or other persons to testify on its behalf.

27 Notice is further given that, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(b)(2) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 34, the

Notice of Deposition

Cage 2:12-cv-08333-ODW-JC Document 69-2 Filed 03/06/13 Page 3of104 Page ID

Oo co SN DB WN & WY NO eH

10

#:1595

deponent is required to produce at said deposition the documents and tangible things identified in

Section B herein.

Section A. Subjects of Examination

AF Holdings will be examined upon each of the following subjects, for each of which AF

Holdings is required to designate and produce one or more officers, directors, managing agents or

other persons to testify on its behalf.

1)

2)

3)

4)

5)

Circumstances surrounding the execution of the assignment agreement attached hereto as Exhibit A and attached as an Exhibit to the Amended Complaint in this matter (“the assignment”), including the identities and locations of the document’s signatories, details of execution, and the identity of other individuals with personal knowledge regarding its signatories and execution;

Whether “Alan Cooper,” the individual whose name appears on the assignment attached hereto as Exhibit A, is the same individual as the Minnesota Alan Cooper, represented by Paul Godfread, who was formerly employed by John Steele and filed the documents annexed hereto as Exhibit B in court proceedings in Minnesota, including 0:12-cv-02687 in the District of Minnesota.

All license and assignment agreements, and any other grants of rights, however titled, relating to the work that forms the basis of the instant suit (“Popular Demand”, hereinafter “the work’) including grants to AF Holdings from third parties, and from AF Holdings or Heartbreaker Productions to any non-parties, including any licenses, assignments, or other agreements with Heartbreaker Productions regarding the work.

All license and assignment agreements, and any other grants of rights, however titled, from Heartbreaker Productions to any third parties relating to the work.

AF Holdings corporate policies regarding business records, (including destruction or retention of such records), including financial records and all records associated with

acquisition, distribution, licensing, or sale of its works.

Z

Notice of Deposition

Cage 2:12-cv-08333-ODW-JC Document 69-2 Filed 03/06/13 Page 4of104 Page ID #:1596

%

0 Oo YI DA NW BR WH bw Be

NH NHN NO NH NHN HN DY NO DR Rw Om ey ee ee ee Oo “SN HA FP WY HO —&§& CO DO CO HS DB HA Bh W HO FY C

6) AF Holdings corporate structure, including past and present officers, directors, members, managers, and all other beneficial owners or other individuals with a pecuniary interest in the outcome of AF Holdings BitTorrent litigation campaign;

7

—

Identity and terms of employment for any and all AF Holdings employees and independent

contractors utilized by AF Holdings.

8) Creation and operation of AF Holdings, including principal business activities, identities of initial members and managers, initial capitalization, insurance, and day to day business operation;

9) AF Holdings’ revenues derived from the authorized licensing and distribution of the work, including distribution of such revenues by AF Holdings and the identities of the recipients;

10) AF Holdings revenues derived from BitTorrent copyright litigation related to the work, including the distribution of said revenues by AF Holdings and the identities of the recipients;

11) Financial and contractual relationship between AF Holdings and 6881 Forensics, including the identity of any members, managers, officers, directors, or employees with an interest in both entities .

12) Financial and contractual relationships between AF Holdings and Heartbreaker Productions, including the identity of any members, managers, officers, directors, or employees with any interest in both entities.

13) AF Holdings knowledge regarding its BitTorrent copyright infringement campaign, including the reliability of IP address identification and the process by which it identifies infringers based on ISP subscriber information;

14) Process by which AF Holdings determines which IP addresses, and subsequently individuals, to sue, including how Joe Navasca was chosen as the defendant in the instant action;

15) The facts upon which AF Holdings has based its identification of Joe Navasca as the

infringer of its copyright in the instant suit, and the identity and location of any individuals

3

Notice of Deposition

Cage 2:12-cv-08333-ODW-JC Document 69-2 Filed 03/06/13 Page 5of104 Page ID #:1597

4

Oo 6 SD A HBP WH PO Ke

NY MB NY NY NY NY YB NY RRR ee ee ee ee oOo ND MH HBR W NY FF DBD WO BO I DW NA HR WH NO KK C|

or documents supporting such identification;

16) Identity of all persons or entities with a pecuniary interest in the outcome of the instant suit and their relationship to AF Holdings;

17) Identity of all individuals with decision-making and settlement authority related to AF Holdings’ BitTorrent copyright infringement litigation, and all individuals at AF who authorized the settlements presented, if any;

18) Role of Mark Lutz (former paralegal for Prenda Law) in AF Holdings, including responsibilities, date and terms of employment and source of Mr. Lutz knowledge regarding the assignment in the instant action, as well as the present physical location of Mr. Lutz;

19) Identity of persons at AF Holdings who authorized the hiring of counsel to pursue infringement claims and who oversee the prosecution of such claims;

20) Information related to AF Holdings insurance policies and indemnification agreements, both past and present, that may impact the parties in this litigation or otherwise relate to

AF Holdings financial liability for adverse judgments.

Section B — Request for Production of Documents and Tangible Things

1. All agreements between AF Holdings and Heartbreaker Productions regarding the work at issue in the instant suit, including all licenses, assignments, or other agreements, however, named, that affect the right of either signatory to exploit the work in any manner.

2. All agreements between AF Holdings and any third party regarding the work at issue in the instant suit, including all licenses, assignments or other agreements, however named, that affect the right of any third party to exploit the work.

3. All correspondence between AF Holdings and Heartbreaker Productions regarding the work at issue in this suit, the purported grant of rights that forms the basis for AF Holdings claims of standing, or the rights of either party to exploit the work that forms the basis of

this suit and other works created by Heartbreaker Productions.

4

Notice of Deposition

Cage 2:12-cv-08333-ODW-JC Document 69-2 Filed 03/06/13 Page 6of104 Page ID #:1598

13

] 4. All documents supporting AF Holdings’ claim that Joe Navasca has infringed upon its

Z copyrights, as described in the complaint in this matter;

3 5. All documents related to AF Holdings decision to sue Joe Navasca as the infringer of the

4 work, .

3 6. All documents related to any “valuable consideration” obtained by Heartbreaker

6 Productions in consideration of the purported assignment that forms the basis for AF

7 Holdings claims of standing/copyright ownership in this matter, including any cancelled

8 checks or other proof of payment;

9 7. AF Holdings’ Articles of Incorporation or Organization, however named, as well as any 10 membership agreements or other operating agreements describing the management and 11 control of AF Holdings.

12 8. AF Holdings’ operating agreement, and any other agreement(s) governing the rights and 13 liabilities of AF Holdings’ members or managers with respect to the company or each 14 other. 15 9. All documents related to Mark Lutz employment at AF Holdings, including but not limited 16 to employment agreements. 17 10. Identity of all AF Holdings employees and independent contractors utilized by AF 18 Holdings. 19 11. All documents related to or concerning the topics identified in section A. 20 12. A copy of the work at issue, as transmitted to the copyright office. 21 Ze 3 NICHOLAS RANALLO, ATTORNEY AT LAW DATED: January 18, 2013 24 25 By: /s/ Nicholas Ranallo 26 as 28 =]

Notice of Deposition

Cage 2:12-cv-08333-ODW-JC Document 69-2 Filed 03/06/13 Page 7 of 104 Page ID #:1599

“f

oO eo ND A FP W HN KY

nN N NO NY bh No WN NO N ae a ee _ a oo SDN UN FPF W NY K|§ DBD OO OHO ID DB WA BP WH YP FY OC

Nicholas Ranallo (Cal Bar # 275016) Attorney for Joe Navasca

371 Dogwood Way

Boulder Creek, CA 95006

(831) 703-4011

Fax: (831) 533-5073 nick@ranallolawoffice.com

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY CERTIFIES that on this 18" day of January, 2013, a copy of the foregoing deposition notice was served via email on Brett Gibbs, counsel for AF Holdings, at blgibbs@wefightpiracy.com, in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 5(b)(2)(E), in accordance with prior agreement of the parties’ counsel. A courtesy copy shall be delivered via regular mail to:

Brett Gibbs 38 Miller Avenue, #263 Mill Valley, CA 94941

/s/ Nicholas R. Ranallo Nicholas Ranallo, Attorney at Law

6

Notice of Deposition

Case 2:12-cv-08333-ODW-JC Document 69-2 Filed 03/06/13 Page 8 of104 Page ID #:1600

;

Exhibit A

Case 21CaseS Ber t2vod Ee Hae eA 3 alerieaNG/361PaPage dP4 Page ID

COPYRIGHT ASSHSNMENT AGREEMENT

This Cupyright Assigament Agreement is dated effective as of December 20, 2011. by and among Heartbreaker Digital LLC (*Assignor’) and AF Holdings. LLC, a Nevis limited liability company (“Assignee

For good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknow ledeud. the parties agree as follows:

L. Assignment. Assignor hereby irrevocably assigns, conveys ind otherwise Wansluis to Assignee, and its respective successors, licensees. and assigns, all rights. title and interest worldwide in and to that certain work GUed “Popular Demand” and associated sith copyright registration number PAUVOQOL 754383 (collectively the “Work") and all proprietary Tights therein. including. without Himilation, all copyrights, trademarks. design patents, trade secret rights, moral rights, and all contract and Heensing rights, and all claims and cuuses of action of respect to any of the foregoing, whether now known or hereafter to become known. In the event Assignor has uny right in the Work which cannot be ussigned. Assignor agrees tw waive eaforcement worldwide of such right against Assignee. its distributors. and customers or, i] necessary. exclusively license such right worldwide to Assignee, These rights may be assigned by Asstunee.

2, Representitions und Warranties. Assignor represents and warrants that: Git) the Work was created solely by Assignor, Assignor’s full-time employees during the course of their employment. or independent contractors who assigned all right. tide and interest in their work to Agsignor: (b) Assigaor is the owner of all rights. ide and interest in the tangible forms of the Work und all intellectual property rights protecting then: (cj the Work and Uie intellectual property rights protecting them are free and clear of all encumbrances. including, without limitation, security tnlerests, licenses, liens. charges or other restrictions: (d} the use. reproduction. distribution. or modification of the Work dves not and will not violate the rights of any third parues in the Work inchuling. but nut limited tu. trade secrets, publicity. privacy. copyrights. and patents: (ve) the Work is notin the public domain: und (f} Assignor has full power and authority to make and enter into this Agreement. Assignor agrees tu defend, indemnify. und hold harmless Assignee. its officers. directors and employees tor any claims. suits or proceedings alleging breach of these warranties.

3. Entue Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement beueeen Assignor and Assignee with respect to the subject miter herein and supersedes any prior or contemporaneous agreements, writen or oral,

+. Madilicotiuns. This Agreement may be niedified only by a written agreement signed by both Assignor and Assignee. 5. Governing Luw, This Agreement shull be governed by and enforced in uccordance with the State of California and the Ninth Circuit. without giving effect to any conflicts uf laws principles.

Case 2:1 CaseGBES EN OTRSORCE NID CUNEO GENEL 3A eF AIMNOING IBA TeaYe VF Ot Page ID

f. Severability. If one or more provisians of this Agreément are held to be illegal or unenforceable under applicable law, such iHegal or unenforceable portion’s) shall be limited ur excluded Irom this Agreement to the niinimum extent required so that this Agreement shall otherwise remmiun im full force and effect and enforceable in accordance with its terns.

is Asignament Assignee may assign or otherwise transfer this Agreement withuut coMsent or netic’.

8, Perfecuon. Assignors agree at the request and expense of Assignee to execute any documents or perform any actions which Assignee may request to perfect this assignment or otherwise implement this Agreement. Assignor agrees that this assignment may be submiued by Assignee tu the United Stites Copyright Office to reflect the assignment.

Y, Contidentiality. Neither party shall reveal the terms of this Agreement to any third party unless ordered to do so by a court of conrpetent jurisdiction.

1. Jaixdiction. Each party agrees to submit to the exclusive personal jurisdiction and Venue of the coturts af the Island af Nevis with respect ta any disputes arising hereunder.

Agreed and Accepted as of the tirst date written above.

Rayimoud Rogers. an behalt of Alan Cooper. on behalf of:

Assignor Assignee Heurtbreaker Digital LLC AF Holdings, LLC

Case 2:12-cv-08333-ODW-JC Document 69-2 Filed 03/06/13 Page11o0f104 PageID #:1603

Exhibit B

Case GASEUABARACDERY HK ORRO MBVe fhe Hed FRAY APohaNer aye! LOf 2Page ID ' GODFREAD LAW FIRM, PC.

100 South Fifth Street, Suite 1900, Minneapolis, MN 55402

November 29, 2012

Via ECF

The Honorable Richard H. Kyle 772 Federal Building

316 N. Robert Street

St. Paul, MN 55101

The Honorable Joan N. Erickson 12W U.S. Courthouse

300 South Fourth Street Minneapolis, MN 55415

Re: Alan Cooper - AF Holdings, LLC and Ingenuity13, LLC Dear Judge Kyle and Judge Erickson:

I represent Alan Cooper who is concerned that his name or identity is being used without his consent as the CEO of AF Holdings, LLC, a plaintiff in several cases pending in the District of Minnesota. His name appears in attachments to the pleadings in these cases. Perhaps, the CEO of AF Holdings has the same name as my client, we have substantial information that would indicate that this is not a mere coincidence. I would like to be certain my client is not at risk of liability for the outcome of these cases and others like it and that he is not being made a front for the litigation activities of plaintiffs. I have attempted to contact counsel for AF Holdings and their reaction has not been reassuring,

My client had for several years acted as a caretaker for a Minnesota property owned by an attorney by the name of John Steele. When visiting his property, Steele had on numerous occasions bragged to my client about a plan involving massive copyright litigation in multiple jurisdictions, He also specifically instructed my client to contact him if anyone asked about various corporations, that Cooper was to call him. When Cooper confronted Steele about that, Steele told him not to worry about it. Needless to say, my client was suspicious, but did not know what to make of this situation. Upon learning about the many lawsuits filed by AF Holdings and learning that AF Holdings has a CEO with an identical name he began to investigate further, eventually prompting him to retain counsel.

Steele has filed numerous lawsuits across the country similar to the ones before this court involving copyright infringement over Bittorrent and may be heavily involved in the cases filed here by AF Holdings. Steele has appeared on behalf of AF Holdings in at least one case (see Ex. A). Steele also shares an office address (161 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60601) with the office listed on the website of plaintiff’s counsel (www.wefightpiracy.com) (see Ex. B and C). Steele’s former law firm, Steele Hansmeier, appears to be the predecessor firm to Prenda Law and used the same domain name (see Ex. D - a screenshot of a cached copy of Steele’s law firm Steele Hansmeier at www.wefightpiracy.com in February 2011) Steele Hansmeier has also represented Ingenuity 13, which also appears to have a similar case pending here (0:12-cv-02686-RHK-JJG) which apparently also has a manager named Alan Cooper. (See Ex. E, page 8). From these exhibits, it is also clear that attorney Dugas shares a phone number with attorney Gibbs of Steele Hansmeier (415-325-5900).

paul@godfreadiaw.com phone 612-284-7325 www.godireadiaw.com fax 612-465-3609

Case ENSECY:OBARACDBRY- FRET MBREAA sled UDALL ohiasen aye! AGH Page ID

f

Hon. Richard H. Kyle and Hon. Joan N. Ericksen November 29, 2012 Page Two

When investigating this matter and calling the number listed on the wefightpiracy.com website, I confirmed that Steele is currently “of counsel” with Prenda Law. I called and emailed local counsel, Michael Dugas to give notice of representation and to find out if there was in fact a different Alan Cooper with AF Holdings. Within an hour after giving notice to Prenda Law and local counsel of my representation, Steele himself called my client several times in a row and asked if he had been talking to attorneys in Minnesota. Because I had not yet heard from attorneys Dugas or Steele, I looked for an alternative phone number for attorney Dugas and found a different number than the one that appears on the pleading (312-880-9160, See Ex. F). This number appears as attorney Steele’s number in Exhibit A as well. Calling that number, I heard a voicemail message which said “Prenda Law.” I again left a message, but have received no response. Because I have received no response from Dugas or Steele, and because Steele has contacted my client, my suspicions are now increased.

‘Today, I received an email from another attorney from Prenda Law, Paul Duffy, suggesting that their client, AF Holdings, probably would not volunteer information. J reasserted my request to confirm that there was another Alan Cooper at AF Holdings. Shortly before sending this letter, Duffy emailed me again and said that I should not contact his office again.

My client would like certainty that his identity is not being used without his knowledge and against his will as the would be CEO of AF Holdings, LLC or as a manager of Ingenuity13, LLC. Because both are Nevis based companies, discovering the true officers or directors is at best difficult. I have attempted to contact plaintiffs’ attorneys, but have not received a response that would allow me to advise my client that he should not be concerned.

I respectfully request leave to file a motion to intervene and to seek discovery

regarding the true identity of AF Holdings, LLC’s CEO and Ingenuity 13, LLC’s manager, Alan Cooper.

Portas...

Paul Godfread

Exhibits

cc: John Steele, Esq. (via email) Paul Duffy, Esq. (via email) Michael Dugas (via ECF)

paul@godfreadlaw.com phone 612-284-7325 www godfreadlaw.com fax 612-465-3609

Case GASE0:42303 22 69¥- Rh Kp bk meacementHikd Hiedgi 942 eRagefa of 2Page ID Case 1:12-cv-00048-BAH Document 32 Filed 04/20/12 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AF HOLDINGS LLC, ) Plaintiff, v. Case : 1:12-cv-00048 DOES 1 — 1058, Judge : Hon. Beryl A. Howell Defendants. ee Se ee |

MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION OF JOHN L. STEELE I, Paul A. Duffy, hereby move pursuant to Local Civil Rule 83.2(d) for the pro hac vice admission of John L. Steele to the bar of this Court to act as co-counsel in this action. Mr. Steele is of counsel with the firm of Prenda Law, Inc., and is a member in good standing of the bar of the State of Illinois and the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. On the basis of the foregoing, it is respectfully requested that this Court admit Mr. Steele pro hac vice for the purpose of appearing and participating as co-counsel on behalf of Plaintiff, AF Holdings, Inc., in

this action.

Dated: April 20, 2012 Respectfully submitted,

By: ___/s/ Paul A. Duffy

Paul A. Duffy (D.C. Bar # IL0014 ) Prenda Law Inc.

161 N. Clark Street, Suite3200 Chicago, IL 60601

Telephone: (312) 880-9160 Facsimile: (312) 893-5677 Attorneys for Plaintiff,

AF Holdings LLC

Exhibit _A_ Pg. \ of 3S

Case CASE 0.02338 @269V-RH Kable mBocéfPentHiled PitdGl 17 9PeR)eHagef 4 OF 2Page ID #:1607 Case 1:12-cv-00048-BAH Document32 Filed 04/2012 Page 2of5

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned attorney hereby certifies that on April 20, 2012, 1 caused a true and correct copy of the foregoing Motion For Pro Hac Vice Admission to be electronically filed with the Clerk of the District Court using the CM/ECF system, which sent notification of such filing

to all counsel of record.

Dated: April 20, 2012

Is/_ Paul A. Duffy Paul A. Duffy

Exhibit _/\ Pg_2 of _S

Case GAS 0:d283e8-G269/-RH Kable mBachkhentFitkd PikdGl 1 IP eRagelS Of 2 age ID Case 1:12-cv-00048-BAH Docuiiant 32 Filed 04/20/12 Page 3 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AF HOLDINGS LLC, ) Plaintiff, v. Case : 1:12-cv-00048 DOES 1 — 1058, : Judge : Hon. Beryl A. Howell Defendants. Sp ed)

DECLARATION OF JOHN L. STEELE

I, John Steele, declare pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1746 and Local Civil Rule 83.2(d):

L, 1 am of counsel with the law firm of Prenda Law, Inc., counsel for Plaintiff, AF Holdings, LLC in the above-captioned action. I submit this declaration in support of Paul A. Duffy’s Motion pursuant to Local Civil Rule 83.2(d) for the pro hac vice admission of John Steele to the bar of this Court.

2. My full name is John L. Steele.

3. My office address is 161 N, Clark Street, Suite 3200, Chicago, Illinois 60601. My office telephone number is (312) 880-9160.

4, I have also been admitted to practice before, and am a member in good standing of, the bars of the United States Court District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, and the State of Illinois.

3: I have not been disciplined by any bar.

6. Ihave been admitted pro hac vice to this Court in one case (1:12-mc-00150-

ESH-AK) in the previous two years.

Exhibit Pg_ 3 of 5

Case CASE 0:02332@2B8V-RH ere awe RACY A&P oPiaw eRagefl df 27 age ID Case 1:12-cv-00048-BAH Document 32 Filed 04/2012 Page 4o0f5

7. 1 do not engage in the practice of law from an office located in the District of Columbia. J am not a member of the District of Columbia bar, nor do I have an application

for membership pending.

I hereby declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of

America that the foregoing is true and correct.

Dated: April 20, 2012

/s/ John Steele

John Steele

Prenda Law Inc.

161 N. Clark St., Suite 3200 Chicago, IL 60601 Telephone: (312) 880-9160 Facsimile: (312) 893-5677

Exhibit A Pg_+|_ of A __

ee eee re eee onal ae PORAG/1B 9AageAayel AGF 24 age ID Case 1:12-cv-00048-BAH Document 32 Filed 04/20/12 Page 5 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AF HOLDINGS LLC, ) Plaintiff, v. Case : 1:12-cv-00048 DOES 1 — 1058, Judge : Hon. Beryl A. Howell Defendants. ae ae

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Upon consideration of the Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of John L. Steele, it is

hereby

ORDERED that John L. Steele be specially admitted to appear and participate in the

above-captioned matter as counsel for Plaintiff AF Holdings, LLC.

Dated: April 20, 2012 Hon, Beryl A. Howell United States District Court Judge

Exhibit A Pg 5 of 2

, Child Support Attorney, Child Cust

OY-RHK IG MBER ATENt WE OM ed Yt 9/199 Page! set 25

ody Lawyers, Family Law Attorneys - Ste... 1 ay — recs

44:

1-800-DIVORCE

CN NORTHERN ILLINOIS)

MAKE A FRESH START TURN OVER A NEW LLAI

Steele Low Home Attorney Profile

Stevie Law Firm Overview Practice Areas Divorce and Family Law Resources Contact Us

poweerer ee oR Oe se ne ere tee cree ee eee ne, PRE Ne 9 ERMA ee eee one merge:

Divarce And Family Lave Chitd Custorty

Chitd Supjzort

Modificatian & Enforcement

Collaborative Divorce % Mediation

Prenuptial & Postnuntiat Agreements

Snousal Support / Maintenance

Domestic Violonce & Orders of Protection

Aduption

Bairkruptcy

STEELE LAW FIRM, LLC

hone. 34 3-5858 ‘Lo'l-Free fin

1-8

Office Locations:

Dovintown Chicago

tGg Bh Cark St. Sume 2200

Napervilie 2U34 Ce

Pts at

www. steele-law.com

WELCOME TO THE STEELE LAW FIRM, LLC with Offices in Chicago, IL,

Family Law e Bankruptcy e Divorce © Child Custody Child Support » Prenuptial Agreements

If you are going through a divorce, or if your financial troubles are leading you to consider bankruptcy, you now have the opportunity to take a situation that isn't warking out and make it better.

All of our clients have unique persanal aroblems that they need help with. We are in the business of solving thos problems, whether they be related to family Jaw matters, such as divorce, child custody or child support, or consumer bankruptcymatters. Contacting a tawyer can be the first step toward taking hold of your future and bullding a better lfc.

If you are looklag for an attorney who willdo what It takes to get you relief fram your [egal concerns, contact us te schedule o free Initial consultation about your case,

Quality Legal Assistance in [Hinois

The Stecle Law Fiem Is one of Chicagoland’s premier family Jaw and consumer bankruptcy law firms. Our attorneys and staff are committed to providing high quality, accessible, compassianate service to our dllents. We give each cient and case the individual attention they deserve, and do everything in our power to reach our clients overall needs and goals.

Our main office is located in the Loop in downtown Chicago, and we also have an office location in the Chicago suburb of Naperville, We represent cients with matters in Cook County, DuPage County, Kane County, Lake County, and Will County family courts, and. 4 the Northem, Souther and Central Distnets of Hlinois federat bankruptcy courts. Boe : Sia

Whether you are looking for an advocate In a divorce proceeding, need help enforcing a : child support order, want to know whether Chapter 7 or Chapter 13 bankruptcy ts better ‘ : ~ for you, you need the advice and assistance of a skilled, experienced Iinois attomey to Pa a help you protect all of yaur tegat rights.

Give us a call today at (312) 893-5886 or 1-800-DIVORCE (in Northem Ilinols) or contact us to leam mare about how we can help you or to set up a FREE consultation.

Rate Information:

Fixed Hourly Rates Fixed Flat Fees Avaltable

ERRE Consultation

We Accept Mafor Credit Cards « Visa

* MasterCard

« American Express

« Discover

We Can Assist You With:

» Matrimonial Law

+ Family Law

« Olvorce

+ Domestic Relations

= Dissolution of Marriage and Legal Separation © Litigation tn Trial Courts

* Negotiated Settlemeats

« Alternative Dispute Resolution, such as Cotlaborative Law and Mediation ¢ Appeals to Reviewing Courts

* Financial Discovery and Analysts

* Praperty Division

+ Retirement Benefits

* Quatified Domestic Relations Orders (QDROs) «= Paternity

* Adoption Exhibit 8 Pg_| of 4

1/2

Case GASH 0482982 REUT-HH PES MEScenent Ed PROCS PoP age Rael d OF of age ID

11/27/12 Chicago Divorce Lawyer, Child Support Attorney, Child Custody Lawyers, Family Law Attorneys - Ste... \

www. steele—-law.com

* Chifd Custody, inciuding Josnt Custody and Sole Custody * Child Visitation

« Child Support

= Chitd Abductions

« Maintenance, formerly known as Alimony

« Spousal Support

¢ Marital Setthement Agreements

+ Premarital Agreements

* Postnuatial Agreements

« Annulments

« Domestic Vanience

Post-Decrue and Post-Judgmeni Issues and Moarftcatians = Restraining Orders

« Separation Agreements

We are a debt relief agency.

Exhibit Q Pg . of 2

2/2

Casetat 0 DEER SOSIH-RAK BOEISSE fiz THERM A Bo MBI PAbOnENG Bare

LU27f12 Prenda Law INC. [

Aboutithe fim Firm Resources Attorneys SEER ee y Practice Areas Giving Case Samples

DISCLAIMER

The information provided on Prenda Law, Inc.'s website is not intended to be legal advice, but merely conveys general information related lo legal issues commonly encountered. This information is nol intended to create any legal relatianship between Prenda Law, Inc. Intellectual Property Atlorneys or any attorney and the user. Neither the transmission nor receipt of these website materials will create an attorney-client telalionship between sender and receiver.

The information is not guaranteed to be correct, complete, or current. We make no warranty, expressed or implied, about the accuracy or reliability of the information at this website or at any ather website to which this site is linked.

Please note that recovery results vary per client. The recovery amounts in each case reflect the specific facts of thal case. Further, recovery amounts in past cases are not a guarantee of future results.

There are no photos of clients on this website, Photos used on Ihis website have been purchased from stack photography companies,

This website is not inlended to create and daes nol create an attorney-client relationship beiween the user and Prenda Law, Inc. Inteltectual Property Attorneys. An attorney-client relationship with us cannot be formed by reading the information at this website. The only way to become our client ls through a mutual agreement in a formal letter. This website is not soliciting clients and does not propose any type of transaclion. You should not act or rely on any information at this website withoul seeking the advice of an atlorney. The determination of whether you need legal services and your choice of a awyer are very important matters that should nol be based.on websites or

’ adveriisements.

THIS SITE IS PROVIDED ON AN "AS IS", “AS AVAILABLE” BASIS AND PRENDA LAW INC, EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, INCLUDING THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, AND NONINFRINGEMENT,

PRENDA LAW DISCLAIMS ALL RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY LOSS, INJURY, CLAIM, LIABILITY, OR DAMAGE OF ANY KIND RESULTING FROM, ARISING OUT OF OR ANY WAY RELATED TO (A) ANY ERRORS IN OR OMISSIONS FROM THIS SITE AND ITS. CONTENT, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO TECHNICAL INACCURACIES AND TYPOGRAPHICAL ERRORS, (B) ANY THIRD PARTY WEBSITES OR CONTENT THEREIN DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY ACCESSED THROUGH LINKS IN THIS SITE, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY ERRORS IN OR OMISSIONS THEREFROM, (C) THE UNAVAILABILITY OF THIS SITE OR ANY PORTION THEREOF, (D) YOUR USE OF THIS SITE, OR (E) YOUR USE OF ANY EQUIPMENT OR SOFTWARE IN CONNECTION WITH THIS SITE.

PERSONAL INFORMATION SUBMITTED TO THE WEBSITE

Any information that yau send us in an email message might nol be confidential or privileged. Prenda Law, Inc. makes effort to protect personal information submitied by users of the website, including through the use of firewalls and other security measures on our servers. However, no server is 10D percenl secure, and you should take this into account when submitting personal or canfidential data about yourself on any website, including this one.

Additionally, while the website does not gather your name, email address or similar information about you without your knowledge or consent, the website does permit you to voluntarily submit data about yourself so thal we can provide you with requested services, The information gathered will be incorporated into our mailing database and will not be sald to third parties for marketing purposes. At your request, we wilt Temove your personal! information from our files.

I you are interested in having us represent you, you should call us so we can determine whether the matter is one for which we are willing or able to accept professional responsibility. We will nol make this determination by amail communication. .

The telephone numbers for our office are listed in this website. We reserve the right to decline any representation. We may be required to decline representation if it would create a conflict of interest with our other clients.

PRACTICE JURISDICTIONS

Prenda Law, Inc. is an illincis law firm. Always directly confirm with the individual attorney whom you contact whether he or she practices the type of law with which you need assistance in your jurisdiction.

wefightpiracy.com/terms-of-service.php Exhibit C

Pg_ | of 4

D

1/3

CASCASE ULB ey- 0288" RAK BIE! OE rent TH HEP P12 9/1 39 Page 14°G 2599° 'P

11/27/12 ; Prenda Law INC.

TERMS OF USE MAY BE MODIFIED BY THE FIRM

Pranda Law, Inc. periodically changes, adds, or updates the material in this website without nolice. Prenda Law, inc. assumes no liability or responsibility for any errors or omissions in the contents of this website. Your use of this website is at your own risk. Under no circumstances shall Prenda Law, Inc, or any other party involved in.the creation, production or delivery of this website be liable to you or any other person for any indirect, special, incidental, or consequential damages of any kind arising from your access to. or use of, this website.

THIRD-PARTY WEBSITES

This website may occasionally contain links te third party websites for the convenience of our users. Prenda Law, inc. does not endorse any of these third party sites and does not intent to imply any association beiween the firm and the party(ies} involved. Furthermore, Prenda Law, inc, does not contro) these third party websites and cannol represent that thelr policies and practices will be consistent with these Terms of Use. If you use any links to websites not maintained by Prenda Law, Inc., you do so at your own risk. Prenda Law, Inc. is not rasponsible for the contents or availability of any linked sites. These links are provided only as a convenience to the recipient.

LEGAL AND ETHICAL REQUIREMENTS

Prenda Law, inc. has tried to comply with all egal and ethical requirements in compiling this website, We do not want to represent clients based on their review of any portion of this website that ot comply with tegal-or ethical requirements.

To the extent that the professional responsibility nites of any jurisdiction require us to designate a priftipal Ps ice or an attorney responsible for

this website, Prenda Law, Inc. designates its office in 161 N Clark St., Suite 3200, Chicago, IL 60601 and its telephone number as (312) 880-

91 - ————-—__- ce, —_

STATE ADVERTISING DISCLAIMERS oe ce

Alabama: No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

Colorado: Colorado does not certify attorneys as specialists in any field.

Florida: The hiring of a lawyer is an important decision thal should not be based solely upon advertisements. Before you decide, ask us to send you free written information about our qualifications and experience.

ilincis: Unless otherwise stated, our attorneys claiming certification in an area of law are not certified by the Illinois Board of Legal Specialization.

lowa: The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based sololy upon advertisements or self-practaimed expertise. This disclosure is raquired by rule of the Supreme Court of lowa.

NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC; Memberships and offices in legal fralernilies and legal societies, technical and professional licenses, and memberships in scientific, technical and professional associations and societies of law or field of practice do not mean thal a lawyer is a specialist or expart in a field of law, nor do they mean that such a lawyer is necessarily any more expert or competent than any other lawyer. All potential cliants are urged to make their own independent investigation and evaluation of any lawyer being considered. This nolice is required by rule of the Supreme Court of lowa. . : , ‘

Kentucky and Oregon: THIS IS AN ADVERTISEMENT.

Mississippl: The Mississippi Supreme Court advises that a decision on legal services is important and should not be based solely on adverlisements.

Missouri: Neither the Supreme Court of Missouri nor the Missouri Bar reviews or approves certifying organizations or specialist designations. Nevada: The State Bar of Nevada does not certify any lawyer as a specialist or expert. New Mexico: LAWYER ADVERTISEMENT,

Tennessee: None of the attorneys in this firm are certified as a Civil Trial, Criminal Trial, Business Bankruptcy, Consumer Bankruptcy, Creditor's Rights, Medicat Malpractice, Legal Malpractice, Accounting Malpractice, Estate Planning or Elder Law specialist by the Tennessee Commission on Continuing Legal Education and Specialization. Certification as a specialist in all other listed areas is not currently available in Tennessee.

Wyoming: The Wyoming State Bar does not certify any lawyer as a specialist or expert. Anyone considering a lawyer should independently investigate the lawyer's credentials and ability, and not rely upon advertisaments or self-proclaimed expertise.

LAWYER'S LISTINGS

The information in the directory of lawyers is provided by the listees. Prenda Law, inc. does not warrant the validity of the information, nor does it guarantee the qualily of the work product,

The determination of the need for tegal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. Prenda Law. Inc. does not review the contents of the listings, which are provided by the listees or any finks; Prenda Law, inc. is not responsible for any material or information contained in the linked sites or provided by listees.

A description or indication of limitation of practice by a lawyer does not mean Ihat any agency or board has certified such lawyer as a specialist or expert in any indicated field of law practice, nor doas it mean that such lawyer is necessarily any more expert or competent than any other lawyer,

All potential clients are urged to make their own independent investigation and evaluation of any lawyer being considered.

OWNERSHIP, LICENSE & RESTRICTIONS ON USE

As between Pranda Law, Inc. and you, all right, title and interest (including all copyrights, trademarks and other intellectuat property rights) In this website belongs to Prenda Law, Inc., its licensors, or fistees. In addition, the names, images, pictures, logos and icons identifying Prenda Law, inc. products and services in many countries are proprietary marks of Pranda Law, Inc. and/or its subsidiaries or affiliates. Except as expressly provided below, nothing contained herein shall be construed as conferring any license or right, by implication, estoppel or otherwise, under copyright or other intellectual property rights.

wefightpiracy.com/terms-of-service.php 2 Exhibit C 2/3

Pg_o. of 3

CASECABE UPR DER RAK BIE! BOL ee T° He V3 9139 PAGE 12 or JeA9* |

11/27/12

Prenda Law INC.

You are hereby granled a nonexclusive, nontransferable, limited license to view and use information retrieved from this website provided solely for your persanai, informational, non-cammerciat purposes, and provided you do not remove or obscure the copyright notice or ather notices. Except as expressly provided above, no part of this website, including but not limited to materials retrieved there from and the underlying code, may be reproduced, republished. copied, transmitted. or distributed in any form or by any means. In no event shail materials from this website be stored in any information storage and retrieval system without prior written permission from Prenda Law, Inc. Intellectual Property Attorneys.

Use, duplication, or disclosure by or for the United States Government is subject to the restrictions set forth in DFARS 252,227-7013 {e}4) (ii) and FAR 52.227-19.

LIMITATION OF LIABILITY

A covered party (as defined below) shalt not be liable for any direct, indirect. incidental, special, or consequential damages of any kind whatsoever (including, without limitation, attorneys’ fees and tost profits or savings) in any way due to, resulting from, or arising in connection wilh this site, including its content, regardless of any negligence of any covered parly. "Covered party" means Prenda Law, inc.. its affiliates, its listees, and any officer, director, emplayee, subcontractor, agent, successor, or assign Prenda Law. Inc., its affiliates, and its listees.

GOVERNING LAWS IN CASE OF DISPUTE; JURISDICTION

These Terms of Use shali be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of llfincis, USA, as they apply to agreements made and solely performed therein. Dispules arising hereunder shall be exclusively subject to the jurisdiction of the federal courts of the United States of America and/or the state courts of illinais and jurisdiction therefore shalt rest solely in Ilknois, USA.

ENTIRE AGREEMENT; SEVERABILITY

These Terms of Use incorporate by reference any notices contained on this Site and constitute the entire agreement with respect lo your access to and use of this Site. If any provision of these Terms and Conditions is unlawful, void or unenforceable, then that provision shall be deemed severable from the remaining provisions and shall not affect their validity and enforceability.

Material available in Prenda Law, Inc. website is protected by copyright taw.

“You may reproduce matesab avaiable at thi site tor youronn personel use and tor non-commercial distribution. AX copies roust inchde the above copytight notice.

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING DISCLAIMER. The contents of this webske shoudl nol be construed af egal advice on any Upsctic fact of cecumstance. tts content wes prepared by Prenda Lawine, {an Werrots Lew Tim organized as 2 banked habdicy company wih As princosl offies at 167 North Clark Strest, Suxe 3200. Chicuyo, IBnois B0601, Ph 1200-380-0840) for general information Purposes only. Your recelpt of such information dors fot Crate an attomoy-<csent retatonthig wih Prentia Law Inc. ot any of Rs lawyers, You shou not act array on any of the Informatian contained here wihaul seeting professional legal acvion. Prrat tesults roferrad to in these matetats do nol guarantee or supgesi @ ckmtar result in olher matters, Prendas Law ines tawyers art dconsad iq nol and a knked numero! other judodaions. They and the iar ae fas iri ed in Bi stalea wthout assoteating locaky Roensed nitomays andor bacoming adma&ted in that

kon fora Kknked pumose. Prenda Law inc, lawyer responsable for the contents of this wabsao ts Paul Duty.

wefightpiracy.com/terms-of-service.php Exhibit C

3/3

ro)

Of 25

Dp

wo

age'L

7,

LL

4

iL

WPT? 9/1

=)

\

uAent TH!

ri

Boe

Steele | Hansmeier PLLC

iK+J9G

ry

TX

d

DER

rel oi

Jaa,

mi * wY

—

at = i @ pt ot OY A

CA,

5

11/28/12

PSDRECMREABTUKKHOSSSLAS Bt pinivisbeisi-int-dt-1 z RECGHRIOSSGHGOGBKRAGRASHAAATD a iiaesr remaster (11 LRORY

QPOMRIATEEPOOMEDDERALOEA NB Gh A 62 2b ad ie 30 a OD RA gb: EOLGOALRR AERA DHEAREEUME LH ~HOM ee O2bS wep CHPSSOSHOS MARBURG ARANDA 7Oga+ 226 eovcann * COOUGRATORBSEKNDARBOBHH = <4 grercverRe VOSCPUGOAGSHEMADHOCOESH -GA.o wy & ra Me ROAUERAGHAHUREGUESCOOM «Deas i" en SLAPCHAEESROUOBUBRUDESE -ORHa 4 ; is CPT ESABEHROBOOSHMRRKBOSEZ ~ 4 ELBE VGIOOHOSOHBAGAEEWSEe Hhe~ HPEREOPOASDAOKEUADEES NOCH OSCASOLEAREFOCRRLED PEERORESALSSOHG SOB HOnREALG DEERE SPREDPDSCHAEBAR RORY 3 LAID AD yS SRO CBAHDEDA LSE OASECALUSHA KEEP AMEME HAMAD ALS heh esecEasaragaasgn 7 SEEIGVED HEBBEN ADHESAOSdEn oe Po ROSPOASHUSAVSTHOLENALA —BEHes Lec sweHane roids : RRELACORSMADRHERVRGTSO ~Gheess~ecesnoary WEEDS ALACROMPAARSGOSAR CWS - GCHBHnoehadnagoga p rte EPCALFOOMPOLEREGOHGSA - HDOerusasacw iT: ‘4 SERSRESAADEEBHRE ODS -HOLs + oo Se GuaEnEh heat tetre ttre petty De acndedidsierteahedehabedbetntet sea ni ARDOSESEPACSAAS OVE SRUAGTEE ARM cee tSseaGesaEaE CVLHECOSHRARDARBABHULHSSE ~-APWs cages ¢ pty irpie = 4 Capeacposeenasangccs ABRRenn w UST 5} HLHOBHROSEORAGZID «UHGew, uw WHET b CPERGRG LARS EH eAGABEES «

Belt t+ CHEE

MAR Icloce

. We represent prominent content

ucs posed by Internet-based piracy, where

ik [> t RHASCARALGHES AOS HH sIRG ir I». Ss sogantnerntocaegonuace s ROSE DACHORAIISOsas rah RVGLOSAHYD LHS eMHD ES z PUCEISERESS SERN GAD < = : SAAESERAAEELHGILE + “ 3 3 R SEILRACAESEAERLS me «Boma da Snes ws -_ BEEVGSAGSESOUARS 1 H4G~~ Ome Bee c se AVARGHAROAKOABECOR «+ Ean coac Bibewmire - * 2 & SOSLICRSIUEORSATe -SYRLCE RAGES Mere TER Ee a) ROGEQGHKESSHGURE - HEwe oe MEEEMS, .. = SEPHRE RB ESOG ONS Fl kt hdeet: Pi g 8 SeborsvebSebscan e fe t- por M4 s LHSIVERAADG RM + pbett - ~ o APEELAOLLALALEGRAGOHO » GB e = FRBLRGEPRSLCRBORERE COR + § c : - he ds SB hn 01 08 PES vee = a ~ Ae nas deuce s m4 eT er Tr ae, i a + peers tits s ri oe HCKRAADAR BE 3 St . reeaetteytec yy . + 2 == = lgkanagaas CORRES 5 % ARE a4 z rs -- Yi 2? 4 co hen] = 2 z By 3 3! g 3 4 e 23! : 2 oa iy al 5 3 nig - z 5 b Aes ease = J E'S i é =a By nb ag FS) os s > Sten atwemnnn rer a] 3 i : } nae htenmanrne ce ons - 5 5 be t--14r ee

st SERBOAGIVA FHOHSEBH SERS REPGSAGPOKA DOREY HS Gaerne Sp phaseesescs é SdONW EES & EHRHLGODA SOY *VSRtH ORAS gogene

FCORE POTS PEBEEE MERA FYTEPYSH GOD HES ORR BiH

ind

<3- ION against

me

+ to a

Or + e

St St id

i

Ptrgegvosse FTORHO HE SH Fabe SA aaeed BLOKEEISESO eS PHLOSALY & PPTCBANE ENR ess tpengvave PRLAGICOOS are Re. PROB ORGHDe Pe eOI Abe RhaD Fe PHH MOR OAS

ee ee $

SEP ES

ne ae

3

+

a

ihttp://wefightpiracy.com/

MEIER

S48 soe ae

] captures

TIF

BE

3 T6433

RIV AFT FE TEA EPTADTIG

v

3

PUPAL DIETS WOPS TRAP ETO Ee 4 PERE STEVE OS ORE Rw FORON PRE Re a meckedd b CER IDDd OLE vtodnogtery HETOKR SEHD VAG FORINT ERG OD PPACMER OR NE

SP PBS: vo eh pegt

ond

¥

HiT Attar toc else Te eHUrTsEeesseptens

e Preserving the Creative Arts Jun 19, 2010 We

ee ah o) SOHNE Ge By

qos

TAH EM OSHLE Veen sans+e eteeetatece

Oe ts

Zi] ye Pay

the vast majority of infringement occurs under ch Sgn

producers and commence legal act

Baybgeb ache seis

INTERSFT AECHIVE ® Steele | Hansmeier Jun 19, 2010 Steele | Hansmeier PLLC is a law firm dedicated to eradicating digit

= Ahn ] if Ie, @ Services

STEELE | HANS

1

ital

cr cd

H left unchecked, d

generations,

arts for future

ive

¢ creat e world

ing th

as preserv’ around th

Ss

ew our mission ssianal

com/

tracy.

atts profe:

vi ative /{wefightp

piracy represents an existential threat to cre;

web,archive.org/web/20110207181155/http

#: 11/28/12 Steele | Hansmeier PLLC

PRE ome

i

"34 oe

® Preserving the Creative Arts

Cantact Us

About Us

Steele | Hansmeier PLLC isa Chicago-based law firm that provides legal services to content producers and creative professionals. Our foctis is purusing individuals and businesses who infringe on the copyrights associated with our clients’ creative works, Our practice includes addressing che unique legal issues posed by Interner-based piracy, where the yast majority of infringement occurs under the cover of Interner Protocol (“IP”) addresses.

We view our mission asa small part of the overall effort ta preserve the creative arts for future generations. In our view, the ease with which digiral content is pirated represents an existential threat to the future of professional content producers. Our clients understand all too well the problems posed

by the unauthorized redistribution of their copyrighted works, particularly given the capital investment associated with producing and marketing professional works.

Services

The legal services offered by Steele | Hansmeier PLLC reflect the lifecycle of a creative work. Such services include:

Due diligence efforts to determine whether 2 proposed creative work lacks originality or infringes on another creative work; Developing a plan for protecting and enforcing U.S. and international copyrights;

Securing U.S, copyrights and coordinating with third parties to secure international copytights in both Berne and non-Berne Convention countries; and

Enforcing U.S. copyrights and coordinating with third parties to enforce international copyrights.

Many of our services involve coordinating with third party attorneys (e.g. international copyright werk) and third parcy technology providers (e.g

i. copytighr enforcement). Our consistent focus is to provide our clients with strong returns on the capital they invest in our time and that of our rhird party service providers.

fon Due Diligence

Before investing substantial capital into the production and/or distribution of a creative work, a creative artist may wish to conduer a basic level of due

web.archive.org/web/20110207181155/http:/ /wefightpiracy.cam/ Exhibit 7. 2/4

Pg_2 of +

CaSeCCASE O:TBB0D26H-RAK BIGINOEMTE FHeEHaM GB ofragpagehbogr agage ID 11/28/12 Steele | Hansmeier

diligence into determining the degree to which their work resembles other copyrighted creative works. The methods for conducting this sort of due diligence vary based on the medium, through most forms of creative work lend themselves to digital due diligence. For example, an audio file can be digitally fingerprinted based on a variety of characteristics (e.g. rhythm, length, melody, etc.). This fingerprint can be compared to those of other audio files. Similar results would then be reviewed to determine whether a copyright issue exists. If such an issue exists, then the creative artist can attempt to obtain 2 license from the copyright holder of the original work. A creative artist's bargaining power is much stronger before they invest millions of dollar into marketing and distributing a creative work.

In 2008, Joe Satriani filed a copyright infringement lawsuit against the Grammy Award-winning band, Coldplay. Satriani’s suit alleged that Coldplay's hit song, Vida la Vida, contained substantial portions of Satriani’s, If | Could Fly. The parties eventually reached an out-of-court monetary settlement for an undisclosed financial sum.

In addition to avoiding infringement lawsuits, it is important to know whether a given creative work will even be afforded the protection of the copyright laws of the jurisdictions in which the artist intends to market the creative work. Steele | Hansmeier PLLC offers services to assist creative artists in conducting the forms of due diligence described in this section.

Protection Planning

Another category of services offered by Steele | Hansmeier PLLC is assisting creative artists plan their copyright strategy in advance of the creation and/or publication of their creative works, Despite the existence of international treaties, such as the Berne Convention, the world as a whole essentially remains a patchwork of copyright laws with varying degrees of enforcement. By way of example, a creative artist's approach to copyright protection in the United States should look much different than the artists approach to copyright protection in China. We offer to assist creative artists in developing copyright protection strategies worldwide.

Securing Copyrights

Once a creative work has been produced and/or published, it is generally important to register a copyright in every country where the copyright holder may wish to assert their rights. We offer to assist creative artists by coordinating the registration of their copyrights around the world, as required.

In the United States it is particularly important to register one’s copyrights. As a general rule, copyright registration is a prerequisite to filing a copyright infringement lawsuit in U.S. federal court and a timely filing will preserve remedies that may be lost indefinitely if one does not timely register his or her copyright.

Enforcing Copyrights Copyright enforcement is a rapidly evolving field. Recent advances in communications technology have dramatically lowered the cost and increased the profitability of masspiracy. As piracy evolves, so too must copyright enforcement strategies, Steele | Hansmeier PLLC offers services on the cutting edge

of copyright enforcement, including: t) DMCA enforcement services; 2) pirate pursuit services; and 3) advising on comprehensive paradigm shifts in copyright enforcement.

Disclaimer

Our website is intended to provide only an overview of Stecle | Hansmeier PLLC. Nothing on this website is meant to be or should be relied on as legal advice. Commentary on this website is not necessarily up to date, This website is not intended to be an offer to represent you, nor is it intended to establish an attorney clienc privilege.

Links

web.archive.org/web/20110207181155/http://wefightpiracy.com/ Exhibit 3i4

Pg_% of _4

CASTASE OLECVD2EIERAK BIG DOE LMHEHL HletHePoi3o/pagp|ageht GU 2bage ID

11/28/12 Steele | Hansmeier PLLC Latest News

Google fights piracy

tz: ? wy

According to an article published on Digital Trends, Google is taking steps to implement several anti-piracy measures, which will ideally make ir more difficult for searchers to located pirated material. First, Google is increasing its responsiveness to takedown requests of so-called “reliable copyright holders.” Second, its autocomplete function will filter our greater amounts of infringing results. [...}

According to a recently published article in the Salt Lake Tribune, Ed Catmull, president of Pixar Studios, linked international copyright pratection to Pixar's ability to continue investing in the cutting-edge technology chat's brought us such movies as Wall-E, Monster's, Inc., and Up - all of which are presumably registered trademarks of Pixar Animation Studios. At |...}

Ridley Scott's Robin Hood, starring Russell Crowe and Cate Blanchect, is not only popular in the cheaters, but also among the BitTorrent crowd. According to BitTorrent news site, Torrentlreak, Robin Hoad, despite its relatively lower IMDB rating, beat our both Iron Man 2 and the Expendables for the the rop spot on the piracy chart [...}

fon

web.archive.org/web/20110207181155 /http:/ /wefightpiracy.com/ Exhibit i

Case rae ey P8aI DRM RAK II! MBSE THE PREP PH 9/PB9 AHL 17 GF 25298 'P

Case 2:11-mc-00084-JAM-DAD Document 1 Filed 10/28/11 Page 1 of 8

—

Brett L. Gibbs, Esq. (SBN 251000) Steele Hansmeier PLLC.

38 Miller Avenue, #263

Mill Valley, CA 94941 415-325-5900 blgibbs@wefightpiracy.com

Attorney for Petitioner

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

oO CO SI DH A BR WY WH

In the Matter Of a Petition By INGENUITY 13 LLC,

— oS

No.

— —

Judge:

VERIFIED PETITION TO PERPETUATE TESTIMONY

— wee me ke W NW

|

1. Petitioner Ingenuity13 LLC by and through its undersigned attorney, hereby

bs nN

petitions this Court for an order pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 27 authorizing the

pms ~l

issuance of subpoenas duces tecum to the Internet Service Providers (“ISPs”) listed on Exhibit A to

_ oO

this petition.

— ‘oO

2, Petitioner is limited liability company organized and existing under the laws

to fone)

of the Federation of Saint Kitts and Nevis. Petitioner produces aduit entertainment content and this

N —

content is being unlawfully reproduced and distributed over the Internet via the BitTorrent file

NO te

transfer protocol. An individual or individuals wrongfully reproduced and distributed Petitioner’s

id Ww

copyrighted works via the BitTorrent protocol in violation of Petitioner’s exclusive rights under

Ww bb

United States Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. §§ 101, ef seg. Petitioner anticipates bringing a civil action

No wn

against the person or persons engaging in such unlawful activity. This action would be cognizable in

wv ro)

a United States court as United States courts have exclusive jurisdiction over copyright actions.

N ~]

Without knowing the identity or identities of the anonymous infringers, Petitioner has no means to

N 00

Exhibit la Pg_| of

Caste ORE DRBMAAK BIG ISSE HAE THEEARPSHZ9/PBIRARO% 40H 2Bave ID

Case 2:11-mc-00084-JAM-DAD Document i Filed 10/28/11 Page 2 of 8

1 || name and serve the individual or individuals in an action with summons and complaint. The purpose 2 || of this petition is to ascertain these identity or identities. | 3. Petitioner seeks the name, address, telephone number, e-mail address and 4 || Media Control Access number of each account holder associated with the Internet Protocol (“IP”) 5 |} addresses listed on Exhibit B to this petition. Each of the IP addresses was identified by Petitioner’s 6 ||agents as being associated with infringing activity on the corresponding dates and times listed on 7 || Exhibit B. The reasons to perpetuate the testimony are multiple. First, without this information 8 || Petitioner has no means to name and serve a complaint on the infringing parties. Second, on 9 |} information and belief, this information is destroyed in the regular course of business and will be 10 || unavailable to Petitioner after it is destroyed. An example of an ISP’s data retention policy is shown 1] || as Exhibit C. Finally, under the Cable Communications Policy Act, 47 U.S.C. § 551(c)(2)(B), a court 12 || order is necessary to discover an account holder’s identity. 13 4. The names and addresses of the person or persons whom Petitioner expects to 14 || be adverse parties are unknown to Petitioner. The individual or individuals responsible for infringing 15 |jPetitioner’s works are known to Petitioner only by an IP address—a number that is assigned to 16 || devices, such as computers, that are connected to the Internet. Petitioner used geolocation to trace 17 |}the IP addresses of the expected adverse party or parties to a point of origin within the State of 18 || California. 19 5, The name and address of each responding party is set forth on Exhibit A to 20 || this petition. Petitioner is seeking the name, address, telephone number, e-mail address and Media 21 || Control Access number of each account holder associated with the Intemet Protocol (“IP”) addresses 22 || listed on Exhibit B to this petition. 23 FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS 24 6. Petitioner is the owner of the copyright for the motion picture set forth in 25 || Exhibit D to this petition. 26 7. As set forth below, Petitioner has actionable claims for direct and contributory 27 || copyright infringement and a claim for civil conspiracy against the individual or individuals who 28

2 VERIFIED PETION TO PERPETUATE TESTIMONY

Exhibit E Pg_D of $_

CasechBh OREN AMAA BOS BSE AER THOM SMBo/RBIRARONE ABage ID

oe Fe 4A DH DH fh WD WH we

= Oo

Case 2:11-mc-00084-JAM-DAD Document1 Filed 10/28/11 Page 3 of 8

engaged in infringing activities via the IP addresses set forth on Exhibit B hereto based on the parties’ use of the BitTorrent protocol to illegally reproduce and distribute Petitioner’s work(s). A. The Unknown Infringers used BitTorrent to Infringe Petitioner’s Copyrights

8. BitTorrent is a modern file sharing method (“protocol”) used for distributing data via the Internet. BitTorrent protocol is a decentralized method of distributing data. Instead of relying on a central server to distribute data directly to individual users, the BitTorrent protocol allows individual users to distribute data among themselves by exchanging pieces of the file with each other to eventually obtain a whole copy of the file. When using the BitTorrent protocol, every user simultaneously receives information from and transfers information to one another.

9. The BitTorrent protocol is an extremely popular method for transferring data. A group of individuals transferring data among one another (the “swarm”) will commonly include peers from many, if not every, state in the United States and several countries around the world. And every peer in the swarm participates in distributing the file to dozens, hundreds, or even thousands of other peers.

10. The BitTorrent protocol is also an extremely popular method for unlawfully copying, reproducing, and distributing files in violation of the copyright laws of the United States. A broad range of copyrighted albums, audiovisual files, photographs, software, and other forms of media are available for illegal reproduction and distribution via the BitTorrent protocol.

11. Efforts at combating BitTorrent-based copyright infringement have been stymied by BitTorrent’s decentralized nature. Because there are no central servers to enjoin from unlawfully distributing copyrighted content, there is no primary target on which to focus anti-piracy efforts. Indeed, the same decentralization that makes the BitTorrent protocol an extremely robust and efficient means of transferring enormous quantities of data also acts to insulate it from anti-piracy measures.

12.‘ The infringing parties in this action were all observed using the BitTorrent protocol to unlawfully reproduce and distribute Plaintiff's copyrighted work by exchanging pieces

with one another either directly or via a chain of data distribution.

3 VERIFIED PETION TO PERPETUATE TESTIMONY

Case RSet OPBEIDABY RAK BI" HL fy, HOI GHBo RAIDER OEY aBave 1D

Case 2:11-mc-00084-JAM-DAD Document1 Filed 10/28/11 Page 4 of 8

—

B. Each infringer installed a BitTorrent Client on his or her computer 13. The individual or individuals associated with the infringing activity installed a BitTorrent Client onto his or her computer(s). Normal commercial computers do not come pre- loaded with BitTorrent software. Each infringer must have separately installed on their respective computers special software that allows peer-to-peer sharing of files by way of the Intemet. The infringers use software known as BitTorrent clients. Among the most popular BitTorrent clients are Vuze (formerly Azureus), Torrent, Transmission and BitTorrent 7, although many others are used

as well.

oO Oo SN DN UH Hh W PD

14, Once installed on a computer, the BitTorrent “Client” serves as the user’s

— fame)

interface during the process of uploading and downloading data using the BitTorrent protocol.

1] C. The Initial Seed, Torrent and Tracker

12 15. A BitTorrent user who wants to upload a new file, known as an “Initial 13 || Seeder,” starts by creating a “torrent” descriptor file using the client he or she installed onto his or 14 {| her computer. The Client takes the target computer file, the “initial seed,” in this case, one of the 15 || copyrighted Works, and divides it into identically sized groups of bits known as “pieces.” The Client 16 }|then gives each one of the computer file’s pieces, in this case, pieces of one of the copyrighted 17 jj works, a random and unique alphanumeric identifier known as a “hash” and records these hash 18 || identifiers in the torrent file.

19 16. | When another peer later receives a particular piece, the hash identifier for that 20 || piece is compared to the hash identifier recorded in the torrent file for that piece to test whether the 21 || piece is free of errors. In this way, the hash identifier works like an electronic fingerprint to identify 22 || the source and origin of the piece and ensure that the piece is authentic and uncorrupted.

23 17, Torrents files also have an “announce” section, which specifies the Uniform 24 || Resource Locator (“URL”) of a “tracker” and an “info” section, containing (suggested) names for 25 ||the files, their lengths, the piece length used, and the hash identifier for each piece, all of which are 26 |; used by the Client on peer computers to verify the integrity of the data they receive. The “tracker”’ is

27 ||a computer or set of computers that a torrent file specifies and to which the torrent file provides 28 4 VERIFIED PETION TO PERPETUATE TESTIMONY Exhibit E Pg ut of 2

CasABe OPRAH RAK BIE" BRRiREty, Fe LASPHH 9 PIOHERLHAY aBage 1D

Case 2:11-mc-00084-JAM-DAD Document 1 Filed 10/28/11 Page 5 of 8

~

peers with the URL address(es). The tracker computer or computers direct a peer user’s computer to

2 || another peer user’s computer that have particular pieces of the file, in this case, one of the copyright 3 || Works on them, and facilitates the exchange of data among the computers. Depending on the 4 || BitTorrent Client, a tracker can either be a dedicated computer (centralized tracking) or each peer 5 || can act as a tracker (decentralized tracking). 6 D. Torrent Sites 7 18. “Torrent Sites” are websites that index torrent files that are currently being 8 || made available for copying and distribution by the people using the BitTorrent protocol. There are 9 {| numerous torrent websites, such as www.torrentz.eu or thepiratebay.org. 10 19. Upon information and belief, each infringer went to a torrent site to upload 11 |} and download one of the Petitioner’s copyrighted Works. 12 E. Uploading and Downloading a Work Through a BitTorrent Swarm 13 20. Once the initial seeder has created a torrent and uploaded it onto one or more 14 |} torrent sites, then other peers begin to download and upload the computer file to which the torrent is 15 || linked (here, one of the copyright Works) using the BitTorrent Client that the peers installed on their 16 || computers. 17 21. The BitTorrent protocol causes the initial seed’s computer to send different 18 || pieces of the computer file, here, one of the copyrighted Works, to the peers who are seeking to 19 || download the computer file. Once a peer receives a piece of the computer file, it starts transmitting 20 || that piece to other peers. In this way, all of the peers and seeders are working together in what is 21 }| called a “swarm.” 22 22. Here, each infringing peer member participated in a swarm through digital 23 || handshakes, the passing along of computer instructions, uploading and downloading, and by other 24 || types of transmissions. 25 23. In this way, and by way of example only, one initial seeder can create a 26 || torrent that breaks a movie up into hundreds of piece saved in the form of a computer file, like the 27 || Works here, upload the torrent file onto a torrent site, and deliver a different piece of the computer 28

5 VERIFIED PETION TO PERPETUATE TESTIMONY

Exhibit _{ Pg 5 of 9 |

Case SAY DB 9D SRY- AK IO SOL Az Fle HANG Bo RBI AB OLIG sBaae 1D

)

Case 2:11-mc-00084-JAM-DAD Document 1 Filed 10/28/11 Page 6 of 8

file to each of the peers. The receiving peers then automatically begin delivering the piece they just received to the other peers in the same swarm.

24, Once a peer, here an infringer, has downloaded the full file, the BitTorrent | Client reassembles the piece and the peer is able to view the video. Also, once a peer has downloaded a full file, that peer becomes known as “an additional seed” because it continues to distribute the torrent file which, in this case, was one of the copyrighted Works.

F. Petitioner’s Computer Investigators Identified Each Infringer’s IP Address as an Infringer of Petitioner’s Copyright Works

25. Petitioner retained 6881 Forensics, LLC (“6881”) to identify the IP addresses used by the individual or sdividiisls that were misusing the BitTorrent protocol to unlawfully distribute Petitioner’s copyrighted Work.

26. 6881 used forensic software, “BitTorrent Auditor” to audit a swarm for the presence of infringing transactions.

27. 6881 extracted the resulting data gathered from the investigation, reviewed the evidence logs, and isolated the transactions and the IP addresses associated with the copyrighted work listed on Exhibit D hereto.

28. The IP addresses and hit dates contained on Exhibits B accurately reflects what is contained in the evidence logs and show that:

(A) _ Each infringer copied a piece of one of Petitioners copyrighted work; and (B) Each infringer was part of a BitTorrent swarm.

29. 6881's technician analyzed each BitTorrent “piece” distributed by the IP addresses listed on Exhibit B and verified that each piece consisted of part of the copyrighted work.

30. In order for petitioner to be able to take appropriate action to protect its copyrighted work under 17 U.S.C. §§ 101, ef seq, petitioner must be authorized issuance of subpoenas duces tecum to the ISPs listed on Exhibit A to this petition.

31. No prior application has been made for the relief sought herein.

6 VERIFIED PETION TO PERPETUATE TESTIMONY

Exhibit £

Pg_G of _{

Case bt GE PRET RW RAK BIE SUL Reza THET-AEP AS RIBRE OLIN -Bage ID

Case 2:11-mc-00084-JAM-DAD Document1 Filed 10/28/11 Page 7 of 8

—

WHEREFORE, petitioner requests that an order be made and entered directing that petitioner

2 |;may compel the production of documents to the extent of determining the name, current (and 3 || permanent) addresses, telephone numbers, e-mail addresses and Media Access Control addresses of 4 || the person or persons whose IP addresses are listed in Exhibit B from the ISPs listed on Exhibit A 5 || for the purposes of determining the true identity of unknown infringers, To further support its 6 || Petition, Petitioner attaches as Exhibit F its Memorandum of Law in Support of Petitioner’s Verified 7 }| Petition to Perpetuate Testimony. 8 9 10 || Respectfully Submitted, 11 Ingenuity13 LLC, 12 || DATED: October 28, 2011 . By: /s/ Brett L. Gibbs, Esq. i Brett L. Gibbs, Esq. (SBN 251000) 15 Steele Hansmeier PLLC. 38 Miller Avenue, #263 16 Mill Valley, CA 94941 415-325-5900 17 blgibbs@wefightpiracy.com Attorney for Plaintiff 18 19 20 21 Ze 23 24 25 26 27 28

7 VERIFIED PETION TO PERPETUATE TESTIMONY

Exhibit a

Pg _“) of _Q

4

_

— Qo

ie) oO ~~] nN tr ff wieN

Case@arieny P8232 96Hy-RAKRIE MSBERTENt Filed 9394/4 9REIq3H, tA geage ID

Case 2:11-mc-00084-JAM-DAD Document1 Filed 10/28/11 Page 8 of 8

NOTARIZED VERIFICATION

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing information contained in this Verified Petition is, to the best of my knowledge, true and

correct.

DATED: October 28, 2611 /S/ Alan Cooper Alan Cooper, Manager of aTE 13 LLC

I, Brett L. Gibbs, Esq., hereby confirm per Eastern District of California Local Rule 131(f)

that counsel for Plaintiff has a signed original notarized version of the above Verified Petition.

DATED: October 28, 2011

By: /s/_ Brett L. Gibbs, Esq.

Brett L. Gibbs, Esq. (SBN 251000) Steele Hansmeier PLLC.

38 Miller Avenue, #263

Mill Valley, CA 94941 415-325-5900

bigibbs@wefightpiracy.com Attorney for Plaintiff

8 VERIFIED PETION TO PERPETUATE TESTIMONY

Exhibit Ee

Pgo_f of S

1/29/12

Skip fo idan Content Logout My Account Search Menu New Civil Search Refine Search Back

CaseckB 0a aa. Cin ROUSE FG EISBN HB ABO PARLHN aBave 1D

Location . All MNCIS Sites - Case Search Help

REGISTER OF ACTIONS Case No. 27-CV-12-17079

Guava LLC vs CenturyLink Inc

C09 C03 LOIEGI LOD

Civi) Other/Misc. 08/10/2012 « Hennepin Civil

Case Type: Date Filed: Location: Judicial Officer:

Party INFORMATION

Steenson DuFresne, Mary E.

Defendant

Plaintiff

08/10/2012

CenturyLink inc

Guava LLC

Events & Orvers oF THE Court

OTHER EVENTS AND HEARINGS Motion

Lead Attomeys

DAVID EARLE CAMAROTTO Retained

612-333-3000(W)

Retained 312-880-9160;

08/20/2012) Notice of Case Assignment (Judicial Officer: Steenson DuFresne, Mary E. )

09/24/2012 09/24/2012 09/24/2012 09/24/2012 09/24/2012 09/27/2012 09/27/2012 09/27/2012 09/27/2012 09/28/2012 09/28/2012

Proposed Document Certificate of Representation Memorandum Affidavit-Other Affidavit of Service Notice of Appearance Notice of Appearance Motion

Responsive Motion Order-Other

Notice of Appearance

10/01/2012) Motion Hearing (9:15 AM) (Judicial Officer Steenson DuFresne, Mary E.)

Result: Held

10/01/2012) Taken Under Advisement (Judicial Officer; Steenson DuFresne, Mary E. )

10/12/2012 10/15/2012

Correspondence Correspondence

10/29/2012| Telephone Motion Hearing (8:30 AM) (Judicial Officer Steenson DuFresne, Mary E.)

10/29/2012| Order Granting Motion (Judicial Officer: Steenson DuFresne, Mary E.

09/25/2012 09/25/2012 09/25/2012 09/25/2012

08/20/2012 08/21/2012 09/27/2012 09/27/2012 09/28/2012 09/28/2012

Resutt: Held

FINaNciau INFORMATION

SL Pr yy,

Defendant CenturyLink Inc Total Financial Assessment Total Payments and Credits Balance Due as of 11/29/2012

Transaction Assessment E-File Electronic Payment Receipt # EP27C-2012-12417 Transaction Assessment E-File Electronic Payment Receipt # EP27C-2012-12420

Plaintiff Guava LLC

Total Financial Assessment Total Payments and Credits Balance Due as of 11/29/2012

Transaction Assessment Mail Payment Transaction Assessment E-File Electronic Payment Receipt # EP27C-2012-12743 Transaction Assessment

E-File Electronic Payment Receipt # EP27C-2012-12816

Receipt # 1227-2012-19301

la.courts_state.mn_irs /Casanerail acny?CacelNh=1ATSSSARA7

~ CenturyLink inc

CenturyLink Inc

Prenda Law Inc Guava LLC Guava LLC

MICHAEL KEVIN DUGAS

422.00 422.00 0.00

322.00 (322.00) 100.00 (100.00)

622.00 622.00 0.60

422.00 (422,00) 100.00 (100.00) 100.00 (100.00)

af

Case 2:12-cv-08333-ODW-JC Document 69-2 Filed 03/06/13 Page 37 of 104 Page ID Case3:12-cv-02396-EMC Doguhéaas FiledO7/20/12 Pagel of 1

—_—

Brett L. Gibbs, Esq. (SBN 251000) Of Counsel to Prenda Law Inc.

2 |}38 Miller Avenue, #263 Mill Valley, CA 94941 3 || 415-325-5900 blgibbs@wefightpiracy.com 4 Attorney for Plaintiff 5 6 : IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE g NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 10 11 AF HOLDINGS LLC, ) No. 3:12-cv-02396 EMC 12 ) Plaintiff, ) ADR CERTIFICATION BY PARTIES 13 Vv ) AND COUNSEL ) 14 || JOHN DOE, ) ) 15 Defendant. ) )

\7 ADR CERTIFICATION BY PARTIES AND COUNSEL

18 Ig Pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8(b) and ADR L.R. 3-5(b), each of the undersigned certifies that he 20 || or she has: a (1) Read the handbook entitled “Dispute Resolution Procedures in the Northern District of 22 California’ on the Court’s ADR Internet site www.adr.cand.uscourts.gov (Limited

printed copies are available from the clerk’s office for parties in cases not subject to the 23 court's Electronic Case Filing program (ECF) under General Order 45);

(2) Discussed the available dispute options provided by the Court and private entities; and 24 (3) Considered whether this case might benefit from any available dispute resolution options. a5 6 Dated: July 20, 2012 /s/ Salt Marsh, AF Holdings Owner PARTY

27 22 Dated: July 20, 2012 /s/ Brett L. Gibbs, Esq., Trial Counsel

COUNSEL

Case 2:12-cv-08333-ODW-JC Document 69-2 Filed 03/06/13 Page 38 of 104 Page ID Case3:11-cv-03335-JSC Doctith€R&7 Filed09/29/11 Pagel of 1

1 || Brett L. Gibbs, Esq. (SBN 251000) Steele Hansmeier PLLC.

2 }|38 Miller Avenue, #263 Mill Valley, CA 94941

3 || 415-325-5900

blgibbs@wefightpiracy.com

4 Attorney for Plaintiff 5 6 ; IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 3 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 10 ia AF HOLDINGS LLC, ) No. C-11-03335 JSC 12 ) Plaintiff, ) ADR CERTIFICATION BY PARTIES 13 ve ) AND COUNSEL ) 14 || DOES 1-96, ) ) 15 Defendants. ) ) 16 eee ee 7 ADR CERTIFICATION BY PARTIES AND COUNSEL 18 19 Pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8(b) and ADR L.R. 3-5(b), each of the undersigned certifies that he

20 or she has:

4 (1) Read the handbook entitled “Dispute Resolution Procedures in the Northern District o 22 California” on the Court’s ADR Internet site www.adr.cand.uscourts.gov (Limited

printed copies are available from the clerk's office for parties in cases not subject to the 23 court's Electronic Case Filing program (ECF) under General Order 45);

(2) Discussed the available dispute options provided by the Court and private entities; and 24 (3) Considered whether this case might benefit from any available dispute resolution options. 25 26 || Dated: September 29, 2011 /s/ Salt Marsh, AF Holdings Owner___ PARTY

27 2g || Dated: September 29, 2011 __/s/ Brett L. Gibbs, Esg., Trial Counsel

COUNSEL

Casg@}{2:12-cv-08333-ODW-JC Document 69-2 Filed 03/06/13 Page 39 of 104 Page ID Case3:12-cv-04221-SC Dociitriéi22 FiledO1/30/13 Pagel of 4

1 || Brett L. Gibbs, Esq. (SBN 251000) 38 Miller Avenue, #263

2 |) Milf Valley, CA 94941

3 415-325-5900 blgibbs@wefightpiracy.com

4

Withdrawing Attorney for Plaintiff

Paul Duffy (Bar No. 224159) 6 Anti-Piracy Law Group 7 161 N. Clark St., Suite 3200 Chicago, IL 60601 8 || Phone: (800) 380-0840 ; E-mail: paduffy@antipiracylawgroup.com

Incoming Attorney for Plaintiff

10 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 12 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 14 |] AF HOLDINGS LLC, ) No. 3:12-cv-04221-SC ) 15 Plaintiff, ) MOTION FOR WITHDRAWAL AND v. ) SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL 16 ) ANDREW MAGSUMBOL, ) 17 ) Defendant. ) 18 ) ) 19 5 MOTION FOR WITHDRAWAL AND SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL 4 Brett L. Gibbs, counsel for Plaintiff AF Holdings LLC (“Plaintiff”), hereby moves the Court

22 || pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rule (“L.R.”) 182(g), for an order permitting him to 23 || withdraw as counsel of record for Plaintiff in this action. Concurrently, attorney Paul Duffy hereby 24 || moves the Court for permission to be substituted in place of Brett L. Gibbs as attorney for Plaintiff. As grounds for this Motion: l. Brett L. Gibbs has been counsel for Plaintiff since the commencement of the action.

2. ‘Brett L. Gibbs wishes to withdraw as counsel for Plaintiff.

Cas@|2:12-cv-08333-ODW-JC Document 69-2 Filed 03/06/13 Page 40 of 104 Page ID

oOo FOF SN DW WN

Case3:12-cv-04221-SC Docufrkh#22 Filed01/30/13 Page2 of 4

3. Brett L. Gibbs has provided written notice of his withdrawal to Plaintiff. The client understands and accepts the withdrawal of Brett L. Gibbs.

4, Brett L. Gibbs has provided written notice of his withdrawal to all other parties who have appeared in this case, and there were no objections.

Di Paul Duffy is licensed to practice in the Eastern District of California, and requests that he be designated Counsel of Record on behalf of Plaintiff.

6. Brett L. Gibbs, Paul Duffy, and Plaintiff are all in agreement that this withdrawal and substitution are necessary to allow this case to proceed.

WHEREFORE, the Court should grant Brett L. Gibbs’ and Paul Duffy’s Motion for Withdrawal! and Substitution of Counsel.

DATED: January 30, 2013.

Respectfully Submitted, Respectfully Submitted, By: /s/ Brett L. Gibbs, Esq. By: /s/ Paul Duff Brett L. Gibbs, Esq. (SBN 251000) Paul Duffy (Bar No. 224159) 38 Miller Avenue, #263 Anti-Piracy Law Group Mill Valley, CA 9494] 16] N. Clark St., Suite 3200 bigibbs@wefightpiracy.com Chicago, IL 60601 © 415-325-5900 Phone: (800) 380-0840

E-mail: paduffy@antipiracylawgroup.com

Withdrawing Attorney for Plaintiff Incoming Attorney for Plaintiff

By: /s/ Brett L. Gibbs, Esq.

Brett L. Gibbs, Esq. In-House Counsel, AF Holdings LLC

2 MOTION FOR WITHDRAWAL AND SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL

Cas6|2:12-cv-08333-ODW-JC Document 69-2 Filed 03/06/13 Page 41 of 104 Page ID Case3:12-cv-04221-SC Docwit#7#32 Filed01/30/13 Page of 4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

-& Ww NN

Dated: United States District Judge

3 MOTION FOR WITHDRAWAL AND SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL

Cas

—

co OH Ss DO A FP WH NY

10

2:12-cv-08333-ODW-JC Document 69-2 Filed 03/06/13 Page 42 of 104 Page ID Case3:12-cv-04221-SC DocuméhtZ2 Filed01/30/13 Paged of 4

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certify that on January 30, 2013, all individuals of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic service are being served a true and correct copy of the foregoing document, and all attachments and related documents, using the Court’s ECF system.

/s/ Brett L. Gibbs /s/ Paul Duffy Brett L. Gibbs, Esq. Paul Duffy 4

MOTION FOR WITHDRAWAL AND SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL

Case 2:12-cv-08333-ODW-JC i ihe 69- 2 Filed 03/06/13 Page 43 of 104 Page ID 1635 Case: 1:11-cv-02860 Document #: 23 Filed: 09/23/11 Page 1 of 3 PagelD #:115

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

HEARTBREAKER PRODUCTIONS, INC. )

) CASE NO.: 1:11-cv-02860 Plaintiff, ) ) Judge: Hon. Robert W. Gettleman v. ) ) Magistrate: Hon. Young B. Kim DOES 1-71 ya ) Defendants. ) . ) ee a eee PLAINTIFFE’S NOTICE OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE OF REMAINING.

DOE DEFENDANTS - Plaintiff, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, hereby dismisses without prejudice all causes of action in the complaint against the remaining Doe Defendants in this action. Plaintiff has completed its initial discovery in this matter and intends to engage in settlement efforts or, if necessary, separate actions against the remaining Does. The respective Does have filed neither an answer to the complaint nor a motion for summary judgment with

respect to the same. Dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1) is therefore appropriate.

{intentionally left blank]

Case 2:12-cv-08333-ODW-JC ithe 69- 2 Filed 03/06/13 Page 44 of 104 Page ID 1636 Case: 1:11-cv-02860 Document #: 23 "Fed: van) Page 2 of 3 PagelD #:116

Respectfully submitted, Heartbreaker Productions, Inc. DATED: September 23, 2011

By: /s/ John Steele John Steele (Bar No. 6292158) Steele Hansmeier PLLC 1111 Lincoln Road, Suite 400 Miami Beach, FL 33139 Tel: (305) 748-2102 jlsteele @ wefightpiracy.com Attorney for Plaintiff

Case 2:12-cv-08333-ODW-JC Document 69-2 Filed 03/06/13 Page 45 o0f104 Page ID : #:1637 Case: 1:11-cv-02860 Document #: 23 Filed: 09/23/11 Page 3 of 3 PagelD #:117

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that on September 23, 2011, all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic service are being served a true and correct copy of the foregoing document using the Court’s CM/ECF system, in compliance with Local Rule 5.2(a).

/s/ John Steele JOHN STEELE

A.

AVN akaik DissilpewsAce Mepobreakeu Midms 60 Rosteited 03/06/13 Page 46 of 104 Peeageots #:1638

Located in: Home > Business > Video News > Exile Distribution Adds Heartbreaker Films to Roster

Exile Distribution Adds Heartbreaker Films to Roster

Please select a category Posted Jan 25th, 201 | 06.54 PM Byrne ee 7g, ne

Uke 2 Tweet 44

CHATSWORTH, Calif,—New distribution company Exile Distribution has inked an exclusive deal with Nina Mercedez’s and Raymond Balboa’s Heartbreaker Films for exciusive DVD distribution and sales representation.

SEXY JUST GOT YOU A LITTLE

AdambveCash.com ; “Heartbreaker Films is exactly what we are looking for—

ultra high end sex packed content that will blow everyone ce BARN-OP TO away,” Exile head of sales Howard Levine said. “| would compare Heartbreaker with the top studios out 4 0; ON ALL 5 ALE there today. There's always room for excellence.” 3 0 y ANE SITE CREAT od

$5 WEBMASTER SIGN UPS 5% TIERED COMMISSION: “5% ON NON-DIRECT REBUYS

FREE TRAINING ;

Exile Distribution’s roster now is comprised of Penthouse, Peter Girls, Exile Celebrity and Heartbreaker AdamEveCash.cor t contact: affillote@adameva.cam Films.

“| have known Howard for over 10 years,” Mercedez said. “He is without a doubt the best salesperson in

the business, with 25 years of relationships and his vast knowledge of the product. We know we will get

the personal attention that only he can deliver. We know Howard is a fong-term person and we were

looking for a long-term deal. We are beyond excited.” is

Heartbreaker Films is coming out of the gate in a big way with its first release featuring Sophia Santi’s first boy/girl scene in Sexual Obsession. Mercedez’s first double-penetration also is slated.

The company brings numerous A-list stars to the table in future releases such as Gianna Lynn, Slenna West, Shyla Stylez, Nyomi Banx, Puma Swede, Santi and Mercedez.

Like 2, Tweet “44 E-mail Comments Previous article Next article ssii.com, Screaming O Bring Buzz and Smile to Oscar Nominees Presenters Retailers Spotlighted ALAVN Awards

Related Content:

Companies Hearlbreaker Films

Exile Distribution Profiles

hia Sanu Nina Mercedez

Comments

Please log in to comment. Don't have a free account? Become a member!

By participating you agree to our Privacy Policy & the AVN “Be Kind Policy” and represent thal you are not under the age of 18.

http://business.avn.com/articles/video/Exile-Distribution-Adds-Heartbreaker-Films-to-Rost... 2/18/2013

‘Ning Mercedez. Popyles Demand jEoming irom Bxdte 2 XBISCOB/06/13 Page 47 of 104 Prege of3 #:1639

iD) % Z #R

HBIZ| 100% B ON ALL

¢ Home > News > 'Nina Mercedez: Popular Demand‘ Coming from Exile *Bookmark » Newsletters + Register [Search a:

. 3 aterun Ry OR RONS

ss

Monday, Feb 18, 2013 NEWS STORY HOME

vews _¢ ‘Nina Mercedez: Popular Demand’

Web i Tech . . Vid eo Coming from Exile

Novelty Pp

Retatl XBIZ NEWS REPORT

Gay By John Sanford

Thursday, Jul 21,2041 Teatsize. #1 ~

Europe

Mobile Tweet Recommend i * atte g Fe

Apparel AspanRae wviaNe Loxxi Star

Legal LAS VEGAS — Nina Mercedez performs the e OliviaNaked oe

canis 2, {st double-penetration scene of her career in chat Fenun Chat Papua Ghat ee FEATURES _2 the new Heartbreaker Films movie "Nina Eeshls Menu Se ee

Business Mercedez: Popular Demand” that will ba

Opinions available July 27 from Exile Distribution. 4

Educational Mercedez, who has not performed in a boy/girl |

Profites movie in more than a year, said thisnewmovia = ¥B!2™_, pate :

Legal is all about fulfitiing requests from her fans who Wolters iFevelpok: Emit: -\Heblte

Quick Bites F have been asking for a d.p. scene and more. XBIZ Research shinetion ay Bellarrenc BLOGS S “lamso happy to be releasing this DVD, | did Will 3D printing revolutionize sex

DIRECTORY these scenes just for my fans, They have been toys similar 10 VHS' Impact on adult Click here to see why MyFreeCams “onaon asking me to do a double penetration for years movies? = tal ~BOARD now," she said, "I finally did it and it was Yos is the largest adult webcam site!

VIDEO INDEX = @ incredible!” 3 36.58% :

Rremipro Releases Mercedez is joined in the movie by fellow A- No ee

Editors Choice listers Sophia Santi, Gina Lynn, Audrey Bitoni Waees a0 Bue?

Studios and Eva Angelina. ae m ge

Discussions Blogs Opportunities More »

GALENDAR To see a trailer, click here.

SERVICES s iy eniae eet teary pean vale subamted ne $ 1% Vall nner =z. Mercedez, meanwhile, is in the running for Aduk | *Y (umtets OL ARIZ nat soci nensor Lets start networking SFO/ Silicon Valley

PR Blaster Film Entertainer of the Year at the 14th annual Ugerntb

Newslatters Adult Nightclub & Exotic Dancer Awards on i A Mtam(?

Mobiie News Aug. 23 in Las Vegas. 0 Is going to Mian

paul markham paso News Fans must register to vote here, RSS } Syndication Do you have a separate FB account for Mercedez's official website is NinaMercedezrxxx.com. business?

Popular RSS Feeds: FratMale

EE sn iveses -Rusurat’ iPaings ‘i : Se BIT

Gh yes & tock ca: Tweet Recommend {PP Blogthis, —GFPine Tema SMS/ Mobile Billing

a Busitess News ATK Matt

9 Feuture Artwies SEW

RY ‘, + . ‘ce Enedia's Episod media in a nutshell :) 2 all current art in» i SXBIZ NEWSWIRE See all current articles in > adult industry news

_ffews far The Meo Related Articles Forbidden Fruits Films Strikes Chord With ‘Taboo Erotica’ Fab 14, 2013 Center for Sexual Pieasure and Health to Screen New Shibari Film Nov 13, 2012 Exile, Monarchy Ship ‘Kelly Shidari Is Overloaded’ Sep 19, 2012 Nina Mercedez Stars in Five New Scenes in 'Sexual !con' Apr 17, 2012 Exile Taking Preorders for ‘Revenge of the Petites’ Apr 12. 2012 Exile inks Distribution Deal with DVSX, X-Cartel Apr 11, 2012 Exile Prepares New Valumes of Pomstar Empire Series Apr 10, 2012

More ways to get XBIZ News; & RSS Feeds | E-Newsletlers | Desktop Widget | Mobile

XBIZ Newswire > Adutt induslry news sence for the snedia ABIZ World > Aduit industry magazine for the digitlal media market XBIZ Premiere > Aduil industry magazine for the retal markel

Looking for pom star news and behind-the-scene videos? Check out XFANZcom | More

+ More 2 More

http://www.xbiz.com/news/136501 2/18/2013

Cas4|2:12-cv-08333-ODW-JC Document 69-2 Filed 03/06/13 Page 48 of 104 Page ID

So COS sa DH NH FF WD PO Ke

Nw MO NY NY KN BH YD DB RO ew] Oe ee i a a ei “ao Nt DN UN PF WD NY KF DOD OO Be HD NHR HO BR ULL DDDLUmrECUCOD

Case3:12-cv-02396-EMC Dociin@84 Filedi2/21/12 Page1 of 13

Brett L. Gibbs, Esq. (SBN 251000) Of Counsel for Prenda Law Inc.

38 Miller Avenue, #263

Mill Valley, CA 94941 415-325-5900 blgibbs@wefightpiracy.com

Attorney for Plaintiff

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

AF HOLDINGS LLC, ) No. 3:12-CV-02396-EMC ) Plaintiff, ) PLAINTIFF AF HOLDINGS LLC’S v. ) RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT JOE ) NAVASCA’S MOTION TO POST JOE NAVASCA, ) UNDERTAKING ) Defendant. ) ) oe INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff AF Holdings LLC (“Plaintiff”), by and through its undersigned counsel, hereby files this Response to Defendant Joe Navsca’s (“Defendant”) Motion to Post Undertaking. (ECF No. 22.) For the reasons contained herein, Defendant’s Motion should be denied.

I. OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S FACTUAL CONTENTIONS

Before addressing Defendant’s arguments, Plaintiff responds to the factual contentions made by Defendant in the instant Motion. (ECF No. 22 at 5-9.) Defendant asserts that “despite Plaintiffs claims about the strength of its case, it has refused to post the undertaking required in [AF Holdings v. Trinh].” Ud. at 5.) The inference Defendant clearly wishes to draw is that, if Plaintiff truly believed in the strength of its case, the undertaking would already have been posted. Such an inference would be incorrect; rather, it is the case that Plaintiff simply cannot afford to post the

$48,000 required by the Trinh Court to pursue its claims. The Trinh Court was in

Casd[2:12-cv-08333-ODW-JC Document 69-2 Filed 03/06/13 Page 49 of 104 Page ID

oO Oo ND OD eR W NY

Be NM KN BD NO RD NR RD RD mm eae a a aes ao KN ND HM FF BW NY KF& OD CO WO HD DR AR Rh Ul LULUhDDDLULUMmwPEH CCD

Case3:12-cv-02396-EMC Doctintéts4 Filed12/21/12 Page2 of 13

determining that Defendant had a reasonable probability of success in that case; for the reasons described herein, it would be similarly erroneous to determine that Defendant in the instant action has a reasonable probability of success.

Defendant asserts that “this case is the latest installment in the ‘nationwide blizzard of civil actions brought by purveyors of pornographic films alleging copyright infringement by individuals.” (Id.) This particular excerpt of the holding from In Re: BitTorrent Adult Film Copyright Infringement Cases is frequently cited by defendants in online copyright infringement cases. But what gets lost in this particular soundbyte is the other side of the story: there is a “nationwide blizzard” of such civil actions only because there is a corresponding, nationwide blizzard of individuals illegally downloading copyrighted material via BitTorrent; literally millions of the latter with only a fraction involved in lawsuits. There is also a “nationwide blizzard” of personal injury cases and breach of contract cases, because when an individual or entity has been harmed, the individual or entity will often seek to remedy the harm via the legal system—and rightfully so. Plaintiff in the instant action, and similarly situated entities, should not be denied the opportunity to assert its rights simply because the harm in question involved pomography. Pornography is legal, pornography is copyrightable, and pornography is very, very popular; what the aforementioned soundbyte fails to recognize is that the owners of such copyrighted works are as entitled to compensation for its unauthorized use as the NFL, or Warner Brothers, or Stephen King. Our society is founded on a tradition of protecting the rights of all, even if those rights may be unpopular; the judge who decided Jn Re: BitTorrent appears to have forgotten that tradition.

Defendant asserts that “the fundamental flaw of these suits has likewise remained through each incarnation — an IP address is simply not sufficient to identify the individual that infringed on a Plaintiff's copyright.” (/d. at 6) (Emphasis omitted.) Taking Defendant’s assertion to be true, Plaintiff is left with three—and only three—options upon discovering online infringement of its

2 RESPONSE TO MOTION TO POST UNDERTAKING No. 3:12-CV-02396-EMC

Cas@} 2:12-cv-08333-ODW-JC Document 69-2 Filed 03/06/13 Page 50 o0f104 Page ID

Case3:12-cv-02396-EMC Docuimkit34 Filed12/21/12 Page? of 13

copyrighted works: (1) sue the subscriber for the IP address found to have infringed upon Plaintiff's copyright; (2) sue another individual who resides in the subscriber’s household; (3) do nothing. Plaintiff understands that communicating with the subscriber is often helpful in narrowing down which option is best, and that is why Plaintiff always reaches out to the subscriber. In this case, however, as both the subscriber of the infringing IP address, Jovino Navasca, and the Defendant, Joe Navasca, both admit (See ECF No. 24, ECF No. 25), neither of them ever responded to Plaintiff's attempts to initiate contact. Let’s revisit Plaintiffs three options: (1) sue the subscriber; (2) sue another individual who resides in the subscriber’s household; (3) do nothing. Those who feel pornography companies should have no right to enforce their copyright might assert that Plaintiff should do nothing. But why? Why should the Navascas be rewarded for ignoring Plaintiff's legitimate claim? This point cannot be emphasized enough: Defendant is asserting that he should not have been sued because neither he, nor his father, responded to Plaintiff. Plaintiff obviously did not decide to sue subscriber Jovino Navasca in this case, going with his son Joe Navasca. Defendant’s Motion and its attached declarations repeatedly demonstrate wonder at how Joe Navasca was chosen as the alleged infringer. As it turns out, when the subscriber of an infringing IP address remains silent upon Plaintiff's attempts to reach out, Plaintiff must conduct an investigation and make factual soplusions and some common-sense assumptions to allege that Defendant, who shared Jovino’s domicile, was the most likely candidate to have infringed upon Plaintiff's copyright. Research turns out evidence, evidence leads to conclusions, conclusions leads copyright holders— i.e. Plaintiff—to name and serve someone these lawsuits. Once again, the alternative would be to reward the Navascas for their silence. If such silence were sufficient to defeat a claim of online copyright infringement, then no copyright holder could ever sue for online infringement of its copyright; any copyright infringer would simply remain silent, and online infringement would go unpunished, undeterred, and uncompensated, the abuses would literally be ignored. That is not the

3 RESPONSE TO MOTION TO POST UNDERTAKING No. 3:12-CV-02396-EMC

Casdj2:12-cv-08333-ODW-JC Document 69-2 Filed 03/06/13 Page 51 o0f104 Page ID

Oo Oo SN HN tA

10 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Case3:12-cv-02396-EMC Doctimét84 Filedi2/21/12 Paged of 13

sort of world AF Holdings wishes to occupy; as such, Plaintiff made common-sense assumptions to arrive at the conclusion that Joe Navasca was the likely infringer. What do we know? Suffice it to say that Plaintiff's content attracts a specific demographic, and Joe Navasca was the member of the household who best fit that demographic. Perhaps if the Navascas had not ignored Plaintiff’s correspondence, Plaintiff could have made its allegation on the basis of better information. But suffice it to say that there is no legal, ethical, or moral justification for Defendant’s implied assertion that Plaintiff simply should not have sued anyone in this case. Jovino Navasca’s IP address was used to illegally download Plaintiff's copyrighted work, and Joe Navasca was found to be the most likely infringer; neither individual chose to correspond with Plaintiff, and that is not Plaintiff's fault. The situation is rather reminiscent (though certainly distinct from) of Summers v. Tice’, the classic staple of tort law textbooks wherein three different hunters may have shot the Plaintiff, but the Court leaves it up to the possible suspects to sort out who caused the harm. Plaintiff has narrowed the scope of inquiry, but the Navascas’ refusal to communicate with Plaintiff, once again, left Plaintiff deciding between pursuing its reasonable theory that the infringer was Joe Navasca or doing absolutely nothing. The Navascas should not be rewarded for their having willfully ignored this issue, and Plaintiff should not face the fundamental bar to pursuing the instant action that imposition of the astronomical security moved for by Defendant would pose. Rather, this case should proceed through the discovery process, and Plaintiff and Defendant should be permitted to uncover information to establish their respective factual and legal positions.

Defendant asserts that “a wireless internet signal extends far beyond the walls of a single home, and could be accessed by neighbors, guests, or unauthorized interlopers.” (ECF No 22 at 9.) These are defenses. The fact that Defendant has defenses does not equate to his having a reasonable probability of success. Indeed, in many situations where there is ambiguity, a case may begin with

* Summers v. Tice, 33 Cal.2d 80 (Cal. Sup. Ct. 1948). 4

RESPONSE TO MOTION TO POST UNDERTAKING No. 3:12-CV-02396-EMC

Casd|2:12-cv-08333-ODW-JC Document 69-2 Filed 03/06/13 Page 52 of 104 Page ID

Case3:12-cv-02396-EMC DociiméA34 Filed12/21/12 PageS of 13

|| the appearance that Defendant has a reasonable probability of success. However, that is why pre-trial

mechanisms such as discovery exist—to allow the parties to have sufficient information to evaluate their respective claims and defenses, and to buttress those claims and defenses. At this point, Defendant’s contention that “unauthorized interlopers” could have used Defendant’s network is nothing more than an alleged defense; it is not, as Defendant asserts, a foundation for determining at the outset that Defendant has a reasonable probability of success.

Defendant asserts that “Plaintiff has put forth no evidence that Joe Navasca actually is the individual that shared the work that forms the basis of the action.” (ECF No. 22 at 9.) Curiously, Defendant has not cited to the portion of federal pleading standards, or any other legal authority, that suggests that Plaintiff is required to prove its case in its Complaint or face astronomical security requirements. Once again, discovery is how Plaintiff plans to buttress and evaluate its common- sense-based reasonable allegation that Joe Navasca was the infringer.

Defendant asserts that “importantly, Joe Navasca is not, in fact, the infringer of the work that forms the basis for this suit. In the declaration attached hereto, Mr. Navasca specifically denies that he has ever uploaded, downloaded, or otherwise shared the work.” (ECF No. 22 at 9.) Defendant’s suggestion that he has a reasonable probability of winning because he declares that he did not act as alleged is laughable. If such declarations served as sufficient evidence, then defending a civil lawsuit would be as easy as signing a sworn declaration of one’s innocence; some might argue that that is how our justice system should work, but it obviously is not how it works now. And to pretend that lying in a federal court is unheard of is preposterous.

Defendant asserts that “Mr. Navasca’s declaration goes on to explain that, at the time of the alleged infringement, he was likely in bed with his wife, who works early each morning.” (/d.) Given the way BitTorrent works, however, the uploading and downloading of Plaintiffs copyrighted work at the observed date and time could take place even while Mr. Navasca was soundly asleep;

5 RESPONSE TO MOTION TO POST UNDERTAKING No. 3:12-CV-02396-EMC

Casq|2:12-cv-08333-ODW-JC Document 69-2 Filed 03/06/13 Page 53 0f 104 Page ID

oO Oo YN DH OH BP WY NY Fe

NO NHN RO HO NO DO KN DRO DR mw ea ea ea eit oo St DN A BR WY NY KH DOD OBO Oo IT HR NH BP WO PO KF OO

Case3:12-cv-02396-EMC Doctimé4t84 Filedi2/21/12 Page6 of 13

BitTorrent can upload and download even without the user being at the computer, or awake.” Once again, this is a potential defense, and, furthermore, it is a potential defense that is easily controverted. This is not a basis for concluding that Defendant has a reasonable probability of winning this case.

ARGUMENT

I. DEFENDANT DOES NOT HAVE A REASONABLE PROBABILITY OF OBTAINING JUDGMENT IN THIS ACTION

A. PLAINTIFF’S CURRENT EVIDENCE OF INFRINGEMENT IS SUFFICIENT 1. THE SUFFICIENCY OF AN IP ADDRESS It is apparently undisputed between the parties that the IP address for which Jovino Navasca

was the subscriber was found to be infringing upon Plaintiff's copyright. Defendant provides a variety of alternate explanations that amount to a list of other individuals who may have used Jovino Navasca’s IP address to commit copyright infringement, asserting that “Joe Navasca is one of several individuals with access [to] IP address 69.109.216.238 (along with his five other house- mates, and countless unidentified potential interlopers).” (ECF No. 22 at 11.) However, it is extremely unlikely that an “unidentified potential interloper” committed the infringement: Neither of the Navascas, in their respective declarations, have indicated that the household Internet connection was unsecured. Thus, an “unidentified potential interloper” would have had to crack into a password-protected network to commit the illegal download. The list of people in the world who possess the expertise to do so is fairly small, and anyone who did possess that expertise would have also had the expertise to not have their actions detected by Plaintiff's investigators, by, for example, using a Tor node—an extremely simple, extremely ubiquitous technique by which one can conceal his IP address. Also working against the Navascas is the fact that they live in a house. As

such, anyone who was able to crack into the Navascas home network would find that their

. http://computer.howstuffworks.conybittorrent2.htm (last checked December 21, 2012) 6 RESPONSE TO MOTION TO POST UNDERTAKING No. 3:12-CV-02396-EMC

Casq|2:12-cv-08333-ODW-JC Document 69-2 Filed 03/06/13 Page 54 of 104 Page ID

oO Oo HN DH A BP WY LHe

Nw NY KR BH NO NYY RD DR Rm me i ee ao 4a DO OH F&F W NY KF GDS OO eo HD DB AT FPF WD NH Kw OC

Case3:12-cv-02396-EMC Dociimét$4 Filed12/21/12 Page7 of 13

pornography was downloading at extremely slow speeds: it is common knowledge that, the farther away someone is from the source of an Internet connection, and the thicker the material through which the signal must pass, the weaker, and thus slower, the resulting Internet connection is. Thus someone who possessed the sophisticated knowledge necessary to crack into a secured wireless network would certainly be able to come up with a more efficient way to illegally download pornography. Defendant may be reading this particular passage, thinking that these assertions may not be correct. Defendant’s assertions—that another housemate or an unidentified interloper used the Internet connection to commit copyright infringement—may also be incorrect. Complaints are based on inferences; trial, and pre-trial mechanisms such as discovery, are in place precisely for this reason: these mechanisms allow the parties to buttress and evaluate their claims and inferences, and subsequently assess how to proceed. Defendant’s assertions amount to the proposition that Plaintiff should be forced to offer up over $80,000 before proceeding with the case because it has not proven its case yet, but that is simply not how our system of justice works.

Defendant makes much ado about supposed inconsistencies in the manner in which Plaintiff's counsel has litigated BitTorrent cases. (ECF No. 22 at 12-13.) Looking past the surface, there is no inconsistency at all. As Defendant asserts, the undersigned has asserted that discovery is necessary to figure out who the true infringer is. But when subscriber Jovino Navasca did not respond to Plaintiff's attempts to correspond, and most-likely-infringer-in-the-houschold Joe Navasca did not respond to Plaintiff's attempts to correspond, how, exactly, was Plaintiff supposed to engage in that discovery without initiating litigation against the most likely infringer in the household? There is no possible answer to this question; if there were, the undersigned would be employing such an answer to litigate its cases. It is unfortunate that Joe Navasca must litigate this case if, in fact, he did not act as alleged. But the fact that there are possible alternative explanations does not amount to a reasonable probability of his success; it amounts to a list of potential defenses,

7 RESPONSE TO MOTION TO POST UNDERTAKING No. 3:12-CV-02396-EMC

Cas

2:12-cv-08333-ODW-JC Document 69-2 Filed 03/06/13 Page 55o0f104 Page ID Case3:12-cv-02396-EMC Doctim&t$4 Filed12/21/12 Pages of 13

and given that he cannot yet prove any of them’, his probability of success at the present time is, at best, no greater than Plaintiff’s—and, at worst, much less than Plaintiffs.

Defendant argues that “AF Holdings has not explained how they have arrived at the conclusion that Joe Navasca, one of six individuals living at the defendant’s address, is the infringer in the instant case.” (ECF No. 22 at 13.) As described above, Plaintiff has done so through the use of factual findings and investigation, a ubiquitous practice in the field of law. Plaintiff had no obligation under federal pleading standards to explicitly state every single one of these facts, and does so in the instant Response simply to demonstrate the fallaciousness of Defendant’s assertions of his reasonable probability of success in the instant action.

2. THERE IS NO ALTERNATIVE PROCESS BY WHICH TO IDENTIFY INFRINGERS AND ACHIEVE JUSTICE

Defendant next makes a series of assertions which amount to the conclusion that Plaintiff's methodology in identifying infringers is faulty. (ECF No. 22 at 14-17) Defendant is incorrect. Copyright holders are entitled to pursue claims for infringement committed online under the United States Copyright Act. Infringement committed online necessarily involves the parsing of an imperfect relationship between the IP address and the infringer, but imperfect does not mean non- existent. The individual who infringed upon Plaintiff's copyrighted work is someone who was able to access to Jovino Navasca’s Internet account. It is a virtual certainty that the individual who used Jovino Navasca’s Internet account to download Plaintiff's copyrighted work was a member of Jovino Navasca’s household: neither of the Navascas has asserted that the household wireless network is unlocked; if the network was secured, only someone with a highly sophisticated

knowledge of Internet technology could have accessed the wireless network without knowing the

3 As described above, Defendant’s bare assertion of innocence is simply insufficient; if it were regarded as sufficient, one could imagine that every defendant in civil cases would simply assert the same. As described above, the alibi Defendant provided of being asleep at the date and time of the infringement is irrelevant; BitTorrent can be left running, and can autonomously upload and download files without the user being present at the computer. 8 RESPONSE TO MOTION TO POST UNDERTAKING No. 3:12-CV-02396-EMC

Casq|2:12-cv-08333-ODW-JC Document 69-2 Filed 03/06/13 Page 56 of 104 Page ID

oO oOo HN WBN OH BP WO YH ke

yw N NH NH NH YY NR RO ee ee ee ee ea eee oO ST DH DH B&R WY NY KF DB OO OW WD DH WA BF W WH KF OC

Case3:12-cv-02396-EMC_ DociilGtt84 Filed12/21/12 Page9 of 13

password; someone with highly sophisticated knowledge of Internet technology would have used the readily available and easily utilized methods of avoiding detection of IP addresses, such as a Tor node; additionally, someone with highly sophisticated knowledge of Internet technology would not have used a wireless network located in a home, as the connection will be extremely slow for anyone outside of the home, virtually useless for downloading the large files of which movies are necessarily constituted. In the alternative, if the home wireless network was, in fact, unsecured (as Defendant will perhaps assert by declaration in his forthcoming Reply to the instant Response), the fact remains that a wireless network in a household would provide painfully slow speeds for downloading of Plaintiff's content (or, really, any content). A home is simply not an apartment; whereas the wireless signal in an apartment need only pass through thin walls to be usurped by another, the wireless signal in a home must pass through—to state the obvious—the outer walls of the home, which are much thicker than the walls of an apartment. As such, the wireless signal in the Navascas’ home would likely be quite useless to anyone outside the home, particularly for the bandwidth-intensive task of downloading Plaintiff's copyrighted work. These are, as yet, but potential theories, and yet they are no less plausible than the explanations put forth by Defendant— frankly, they are much more plausible; to deem otherwise would be to trust Defendant’s unsupported assertions ex ante, and there is absolutely no justification for doing so. B. THE ASSIGNMENT AGREEMENT JIS VALID

Defendant offers various conspiracy theories that, in sum, argue the proposition that the assignment agreement by which Plaintiff obtained the underlying copyright at issue in this case is invalid. (ECF No. 22 at 17-21.) Defendant’s serious allegations regarding supposed misconduct by Plaintiff, in addition to being wholly unsubstantiated, are also irrelevant to whether the assignment agreement is valid. The law of copyright requires only that the assignment be signed by the assignor and not the assignee; as such, any supposed inconsistency (or, more appropriately, any conspiracy

9 RESPONSE TO MOTION TO POST UNDERTAKING No. 3:12-CV-02396-EMC

Casd|2:12-cv-08333-ODW-JC Document 69-2 Filed 03/06/13 Page 57 of 104 Page ID

oO Oo SN DH A FP WD YP eK

bo bo NO iw) iw) nN bo dN nN —" —_ — et _ ry —_ i" — oo SN BD NH F&F Ww NY KF DT DO WO I HD WAT FBP Ww HH &*- OO

Case3:12-cv-02396-EMC Docutneit$4 Filed12/21/12 Page10 of 13

theory) is wholly irrelevant to a prima facie showing of copyright ownership. See 17 U.S.C. 204; Effects Associates, Inc. v. Cohen, 908 F.2d 555, 557 (9th Cir. 1990). As the Ninth Circuit asserted in Effects Associates, Inc. v. Cohen, “The rule is really quite simple: If the copyright holder agrees to transfer ownership to another party, that party must get the copyright holder to sign a piece of paper saying so. It doesn't have to be the Magna Charta; a one-line pro forma statement will do.” Jd. Exhibit B to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint demonstrates that the assignor signed the assignment agreement (See ECF No. 13 at Exhibit B) Defendant’s contentions based on conspiracy theories of Alan Cooper’s involvement are thus meritless, and should be dismissed as such.

C. DEFENDANT’S BARE ASSERTION THAT HE HAS NOT COMMITTED COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT JIS IRRELEVANT

As Defendant is currently defending himself in a copyright infringement lawsuit, it would be rather surprising if Defendant were to assert that he did commit copyright infringement. Though defendant states that he “unequivocally denies, under penalty of perjury, that he has ever uploaded, downloaded, or otherwise shared the work that forms the basis of the instant suit,” (ECF No. 22 at 21), we can imagine at least a few instances in the practice of law in which individuals have lied about their innocence to avoid liability. This argument amounts to “I am innocent because J say I am innocent,” and such an argument cannot support the proposition that Defendant has a reasonable probability of winning the case. As previously noted, Defendant’s assertion that “he and his wife are generally in bed long before. ..the time of the alleged infringement” (ECF No. 22 at 21) is irrelevant to whether he committed copyright infringement at that time, as that time is when the uploading and downloading were observed to be taking place; given the way BitTorrent operates, Defendant need not have been at his computer at the moment that the infringement was observed. (See supra at n.1.) Though Defendant “fully expects he will ultimately be exonerated in the instant matter,” he has provided no concrete reason for why the Court should share his expectation. At this time, Defendant has offered mere theories of why he could be found innocent, and Plaintiff, throughout this Motion,

10 RESPONSE TO MOTION TO POST UNDERTAKING No. 3:12-CV-02396-EMC

Casq¢}2:12-cv-08333-ODW-JC Document 69-2 Filed 03/06/13 Page 58 of 104 Page ID

o 1H SN WDB A FPR WY NO =

i) bho No N- nN No bd bo nN — a _ pend it — ~~ —_ — _ Oo ~] ON Ww ae W bho —_ fom] ‘© Oo ~ an wal -& WwW i) —_ [mr]

Case3:12-cv-02396-EMC Docuin&RPA Filed12/21/12 Page11 of 13

has offered counter-theories as to why his theories of innocence are flawed. That is why we have trial, and pre-trial mechanisms such as discovery—to buttress and test these theories. But if the Court accepts Defendant’s bare assertions and imposes the astronomical security demanded by Defendant, Plaintiff will not be able to afford the security, and consequently, will not be able to have its day in Court. That is not justice.

Il. ANY AMOUNT OF SECURITY WOULD BE UNREASONABLE

First, in reality, requiring a security, as the Court understands, is only in extreme cases; cases that are essentially “slam dunks.” To obtain an order for security, a party must demonstrate a reasonable probability of winning the case. As described above, all of the bases upon which Defendant reasons that he has such reasonable probability are flawed; indeed, some are wholly irrelevant to the inquiry of whether he has a reasonable probability of winning the case. Defendant argues that “not a single one of the cases [filed by Plaintiff's counsel] has been decided on the merits.” (ECF NO. 22 at 24.) The percentage of cases in the American legal system that even go to trial is widely reported as being around 2%, In addition, the set of cases mentioned by Defendant are relatively new; it is well known that even getting to the trial stage takes a fair amount of time. This argument by Defendant does not point out anything that is unique to Plaintiff, and thus does not support the proposition that security is reasonable in the instant action.

Defendant argues that “AF Holdings has refused to post security in the only matter where it has thus far been required, casting further doubt on the merit of their claims and their intention of standing behind those claims when challenged.” (ECF No. 22 at 24.) While Defendant’s explanation is convenient for Defendant, there is actually a much simpler explanation: as described above, Plaintiff simply cannot afford to post the security requested in the case mentioned by Defendant. Defendant mentions that AF Holdings is based in St. Kitts and Nevis, but has not pointed out a single negative aspect of the company, other than the fact that it actually tries to enforce its rights

11 RESPONSE TO MOTION TO POST UNDERTAKING No. 3:12-CV-02396-EMC

Cas@|2:12-cv-08333-ODW-JC Document 69-2 Filed 03/06/13 Page 59 of 104 Page ID

Case3:12-cv-02396-EMC Documerts4 Filed12/21/12 Page12 of 13

under the Copyright Act, a fact which certainly should not be used against Plaintiff. Defendant has not carried his burden of proving that he has a reasonable probability of winning the case; as such, any imposition, at all, of security would be unreasonable in the instant action. CONCLUSION Defendant has moved the Court to impose an insurmountable obstacle to Plaintiff's litigation

of its case. Granting security in this case would not only defeat the instant case, but would also encourage all copyright infringers to simply not correspond with copyright owners attempting to fight online infringement of their copyrights—after all, even if they ignore the copyright owners, all they have to do is move for security when they get sued and deny that they infringed the copyright. Plaintiff's methods are concededly not perfect, but there is no perfect method for identifying individuals who commit harms over the Internet. Plaintiff contends that it takes reasonable measures to identify the individual that is most likely to have infringed upon its copyright, and, furthermore, that Defendant has not demonstrated why there is a reasonable probability that he did not infringe upon Plaintiff's copyright—that is, after all, the burden that Defendant must carry for the instant motion, and it is well known that it is hard to prove a negative.

Respectfully Submitted,

AF HOLDINGS, LLC, DATED: December 21, 2012

By: /s/ Brett L. Gibbs, Esq.

Brett L. Gibbs, Esq. (SBN 251000) Of Counsel to Prenda Law Inc.

38 Miller Avenue, #263

Mill Valley, CA 94941 415-325-5900 blgibbs@wefightpiracy.com Attorney for Plaintiff

12 RESPONSE TO MOTION TG POST UNDERTAKING No, 3:12-CV-02396-EMC

Cas

So CO ST DN AHR Ee DR De

NH NHN NH NH KB ND DQ NRO Rm me ea ig gs aon DN UO FF Ww YN KFKF§ DGD OBO CO SD HR Rh BR WH PH KF CO

2:12-cv-08333-ODW-JC Document 69-2 Filed 03/06/13 Page 60 o0f104 Page ID Case3:12-cv-02396-EMC DocuimeAPH Filed12/21/12 Page13 of 13

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that on December 21, 2012, all individuals of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic service are being served a true and correct copy of the foregoing document, and all attachments and related documents, using the Court’s ECF system, in compliance with Local Rule 5-6 and General Order 45.

/s/ Brett L. Gibbs Brett L. Gibbs, Esq.

13 RESPONSE TO MOTION TO POST UNDERTAKING No. 3:12-CV-02396-EMC

Case 2:12-cv-08333-ODW-JC Document 69-2 Filed 03/06/13 Page 61o0f104 Page ID #:1653

_ Capital Reporting Company

REPORTING CoMPANY® We Never Take Your Business For Granted! Order Form - Case Name: Witness(es):

Job Date: Reporter Name:

Appea rance Information (Please feel free to attach your business card here.) Contact Name:

Firm Name:

Address:

City: State: Zip: Phone: Fax: Email:

Order Information [INITIAL TO THE LEFT OF EACH REQUESTED ORDER ITEM] Format (all format options are included in the per page rate.)

___ STANDARD: includes Regular, Minuscript, Mini CD, and E- ___COMBINATION: Select any combination of the following Transcript Email. options (all formats include a Keyword Index):

___ TRANSCRIPT ONLY: includes .PDF, .TXT, and .VDF files. ——Regular (ix page) = ___Mini CD w/ASCII, PDF & .VDF Files *No shipping charge plus receive a $5.00 'Go Green‘ discount! —_Minuscript (4x page) +_E-Transcript Email

Additional Services (additional costs, above the per page rate, will apply. Please contact the office for rates.) ( —

SERVICES: ___Rough ASCI} __Realtime | __.PTXFile

EXHIBITS: ___Paper (B&W) —_Paper (Color) __Scanned(.PDF) __Bundle (Paper + .PDF) Hyperlinked (select format): __ LeF _—_.viG

VIDEO: _.DVD__VHS __FlashDrive W—.mpeg? __.mpeg4 Sync: __ w/Text ——w/.LEF (Text + Exhibits)

Turnaround Time (additional costs, above the Regular per page rate, will apply for expedited delivery. Please contact the office for rates.) ___ REGULAR (8-10 business days) ;

___5.business days ___4 business days

___ EXPEDITE (select one): ___7 business days __'ébusinesé ‘days , ——3 business days _ 2 business days ——Next business day __ Same business day P. aymen t Information (if you would like to pay by credit card, you may enter the information below.)

Acknowledgement

I and/or my firm hereby accept responsibility for payment of invoice(s) for services requested by me related to the above-referenced matter. I understand that Capital does not accept assignment, and that payment of my invoices is not contingent upon the outcome of the case or on the financial status of my client. I understand that payment, in full, is due within thirty (30) days of the date of the invoice and that finance charges will accrue at the rate of 1.5% per month after 30 days. In the event that Capital engages an attorney to collect any overdue balance, I and/or my firm will be responsible for attorney's fees and, in the event suit is filed, all court costs. I and/or my firm hereby consent to jurisdiction and venue in the Superior Courts of the District of Columbia.

Signature Date

www.CapitalReportingCompany.com (T) 415-499-3376 (F) 415-491-4635

Case 2:12-cv-08333-ODW-JC Document 08-2 i “Fited 0 06/13" Page 63 of U4 Page (5 #:1

JOIOUISUBL Weleg

‘NW ‘sHodveuuryy ut ‘(0g ‘¢ AB, UO painsexy Jaewsuey [neg

"NIN ‘syodreunty] Ul ‘OLOT ‘Z Jaquiides UO Palloexy

[ JO [ o8eg

Case 2:12-cv-08333-ODW-JC Document 69-2 Filed g

#:1656

0} UsALs gsamppe (udi.,) [090]01g JouraqUy ue Aq Ajajos souOANEY 0} UMOUY ae saog ‘ANUOp!

0} Sess uoyNad JB SoOcy st} 0} Saofases yous] sapraoid yeu (,,4Sj,,) 1eplAgIy BOAIIG WU We sT (,JSBOWMOD,,) TT ‘suopzorumunnor aqep isvoufoD juapuiodsay ‘y

STOUT ‘AlunoD.WE[D Ig Gf aJqussaase surajs4s reyNdUI0s SEipnjoUT ‘sunajsAs teqnduros peiaroid sarwredo rey Avediwos Aipiqey pay ¥ st isuonNag ‘¢

SULAVd GL

"Wo IsUrEdE Supraduey Jaindeuco pue osnqe pre

paelz Jonduoo Joy uorjow ue apy Avo rauoNNey Wy! Os (,,830C],,) SOC] WYOL polyttuepran Ayqueapt 8} PZZ FNY wnoey siuadng siouqy o) qwensmd uoynad siyt ssutiq toloniag %

NOLLOYV FAL AO MILYN

iSMO}[O} 68 solNS 'Foarayy Loddns g pur ‘orex9y poyseny vy IqIYUXE wo paysiy sogsaippe

(ud) [9901GLg JeWIAI TT Ip YIM Parelaosse sraquiosqns 9y} jO UCReULagUl dupApNUap: ay) opracid

O} (,JSERHOD,,) DT] stontonmMuog 21487) JseoUIO7 SuLmbs: wapig ue jo Aijws soy umo7 SM. suoyned Aqarey ‘fewons psudisispun sit ySaonp “777 saeay ‘somone sf

SHLLLENY ONY SNOS8ad

: fs =) 2) Es ey = fe 5 i-=) S B fe & z = ; cy

“yWapuodsay

‘OTT ‘SNOILVOINNWINODS TIA¥D LSVOWOO

"A

‘rauonnsg

Lf AY Use] on

PO ON NN I, A LO om,

‘OTT ¥AVND

NOISTAIC MV'1 SIONITTI ‘ALNNOD ALV'ID “LS TIG9UWD TVIDIGOL KLANG FL JO LAAOD LIQUID SELL NI

Case 2:12-cv-08333-ODW-JC Document 69-2 Filed 03/06/13 Page 65 o0f104 Page ID #:1657

fagk3 Aq Apusca ,payesre] useq savy gueq OE se AuBU S[P],, yes Turureydxe) g ywaluxY

Se OyaOY PsyseHe “Z10Z ‘p OO ‘LSOd LVAIRL THY, ‘SYWOG wwouauy uo sysoY WLIW 302

-a8i07 40f ssayspuyog duuinsey Supd sutaosagny ‘osouy pryouA 2ag ‘sureysXs sajndulcs pajsgjord Jo ayeaud HayureuRw suoAue a) Jeoxrg) soles F aWODSG sey Bunjoepy “g

GNROWD HOV A

(, HOS 1NDTIA sy VO UONsIpsENf Jonear-oalqns SMyuOo pUe TBLOLMUNSUOGD St ZZ BMY.) (166T

4D ‘day TI) £26 ‘0Z6 PLAN PRS ‘421HOY ‘a SaInYS OszD Bas tyZZ “A PT ‘IM HET ‘6 § IA “UV

“SU02} “TT “MOD UNIT dy) Jo votloipsun! INTO sArsn[oOXs out UIYIK S[pey AreAoostp yNs~eId JOT conned @ OSNVJOg ISIE Sip IAG wonorpsiof JaneW yoaiqns SBI PINOT SIE, ‘L

“STOUT ‘AITNOD MBI IS Ul ssalirsng syoRsuAN jseaWwOD ‘ayURY “stout ‘A1wnEg

FIL) ‘IS Ul SopIsal syuupuiayagy aoq] ay JO aud IScay Je asneoag sedosd st onUsA ,, "Spies WwSHOs

$1 AAONSIP (ot{m Woz, Sanus JO suosiod ay] Jo salou JO GUO YOTYAA UT JO WYBNo1q 9q IYSIUE

Tuipessord 30 VoTAY i YsTyas GE AQUNGD ayy jo VINES yManD aig ue UORMAd paris BJO Sul at Aq parent aq eqs Araaoosyp oJ woNos oU[3],, p27 “UPT TL vet Oiiuensmg = “9

AONBA ANY NOLLOIGSRIAL

‘AUNUOPL 31L] SAOC] Sif) OF Ssaippe

dt .S90c] oth yuny ua ey Agua Apoo om st JswouloD “suNT] ST} Je JavOTINS OF a[quiERAR Jou

ae pPuE syQnd Jou are sploosl assy) ‘FOAsMOPY “Taquosqns at) Jo sessoarppy [TeUl-e alow FO suo

pue ‘slaquinu suardezs) SOW! JO UO ‘sassaippe s1OWs JO GUO ‘suTeE at apntour AypeordAy yoiym

SPIOJal UTEIMTEU OSTE JSEOUIOD “JUSWUSISSe dip Jo prodes B QUIN Jo pond v JOY STO} Wl surejurELE PUL JaqiOsgns @ 0} ssarppe gy] Ue SUTINSE I PRIN DJEP PUe OBIT] OU] SPIOTaT IseDLO7} '¢

"ALENY PUG OEP UDAIS B Ie

AS] Ue Ag srosa yourayyy 0} pousisse sp ey Jsquinu anbrutt w st ssouppe gy Wy ‘WwEIWIOD Aq ssoqq

atl

Case 2:12-cv-08333-ODW-JC Document 69-2 Filed 03/06/13 Page 66 of 104 Page ID #:1658

Sed oj soyzed-pimp gautnber Aq anusaar sayesausd zyquieyg “sya XQ paumo yus}UOS Samqiasrp WY UE TOReS OMpes ay[joyes e axl] st yynumM[g ‘AForeue zo Aem Ag ‘JuaIOS qusuIMELAjus ynpe Aped-psmpB anqrnsip yu} suraysks sayndwioo saywiedo pur sumo YnuMg ‘Lh asnqdy pry pneiy iayndaog -v SNOLLVYOSTIY TWOALIVE ‘Ce UNas 09 syOd—no pajoadsns Suoye; sorueduaros yy ‘sjuoy pedey wo 3ysNoZ 9g OsTe siayoRNe JOgho,, ey Iursodord SSOYL JFL JOPUNOY JH WORT pe .,"UOMONNSIp sseu yo uodeam w RY JOQIO ‘ppm pazffiato B 88 SOB] OA\ IWAN) JUBOYIETIS PSO 94) St YORPE yOMTAL londuOo UIOLE Wang sy BAdtT9q 7,, 1eUL SuiurBldxe Asusp, UMeysy foro yun ews 33949 tay s9uts0]) A RGYXy se OaIoy payoryy ‘ZIGZ ‘og Aing ‘ssaud HAN NYOIMAWTY ‘aruaGC ayi uo 08 of sa8in ssapuafeg sagkD ‘uecadeyy) auapyy 9a$ “SURO SY} OI Jorjel 3paes 0] pedemoous em Zupjoey Aq pewey semedaog ‘OT “(. paqaey Ao sendurod Tq Ge woop pourwigo,, azoa Jey) sqy soraep addy uopyrur E, Patigeiqo dno soyoey & yy Surneydxa) q NGIXA sv oysry poyowe ‘zZIOZ *p Ides ‘aap ‘doxdey fq worgy uajors Gpadeyy sQy aaisaq ajddy uoypipy [ asoajay Srayouyy ‘Iayoz wry ae¢ ‘spoRe Supjoey wosy suNWUTT JOU are SstUaTe [eyUsWIUTEAOS puv suoNBIOdIOD VdIEy YoAy ‘6 ‘(,AdS UBUINY 2 UL puars OF aaey uel) LauyeL ‘ames eurUO OE Uy ALedozd penqool[alUy Yeas 0} JO — YURG B OWN H[BM 0} SALT UBtR TAYE YUnoooe YUNG Guo We WuOIy ASLIOMT JeO}s O] [BUTULLO & Joy JayBs puv Jarsea s.y[t],, ey Suns WOU Way Anoas Jo 1901450 AjoMOes JoruD ‘zueA\MOS SIPpy) D NaLYXY se OYOY payoue

‘TLOZ ‘OE AME ‘AVAO.L YSN. ‘syoounsagh> of mSis ur umopmory oN ‘opityooy uokEg {(-teyorY

Case 2:12-cv-08333-ODW-JC Document 69-2 Filed 03/06/13 Page 67 of 104 Page ID #:1659

“YW MQIYXy WE YOY 188 SI LOPeLUOFUT sry, “suTsysAs JoIndm0S $ JUNO HEY possesoe Alpoganjun Ao) Sour] pue soywep sip se [jaa se sasseippe gy iow Aq poyuepT ae sanrayoe TRYne[uN sayy Sunyimoo spenprarpur syy “suraysAs soynduoo ssouognag uo Qranoe Suueys promssed pie ‘ssosoe pozyotpneun ‘duryowy sip payogjap azeayos sayndwiog ayy ‘sutasds sayndinos sy Jo seqoesiq pozLowyNEuN ey j99;spP 0} JONOTINAG PEMO|[e WeIp seKQJos Ja;ndwOS ysnony sisyoey ayy WIM poyeloosse sassamppe qT] oy? poyTuep! Fouoeg ‘c] ‘sossaippe g] ayy Aq paynuapt oq Ajuo ued sang ‘sessorppe (wuts 10 Siaquinu auoydazay ‘gassaIppe ‘sete ony May $e Yous ‘uogeuuojui euasied Sutkyquepi Aut opiAdrd 0, pannber rou sue Aap ‘promesed payouy e YFRONy] oIsqom sy) posseooe saoq] aoufg “py “SOHSQOM S,JJHUIBIG Ssada" 0} SpuoMsSsed awecunsay UrBIqo pay Joy Aed oy ssom) sae ‘serEd pimp oO} ssaoae OAKS BOAe 100 Soop puy syiond Fuel Wey} UOHEUUOFNT JeyjO pus ‘nonEArOyET ALmags pur FurwergoId sondwoo HOnEUNION ake ‘BONEUOFUL FUNOIOR ‘SIRUIOINS § jJHUJ{ JO sonnuep: oy) gorpresoz woreUosuy Stipnfout ‘uoneuoyur seayd of Aad sureoog seoqT 2g] ‘Stoquiaw Surhed aan Aoup Ysnayy se surayshs eindU0a F,jINUIPY Sss29E O} QIQR sien 820q BU ET “aurs SUI Op 01 sIeINo pPowusied foyr ‘suaysh$ Joynduios paayoid § synurpig 0] ssgoor pazuioyjngun peutes Lay) aouG “suraysks Jayndios paysejoid § UME oF ssogoe pozHoyjnEoN ules Oo} splomssed pus Saureutasn usjO}$ aif pIsa ssoq] SUL ‘Jeyjone auo |sduowe spromesed pue saurEMissn Ua]OIS Ape] Oo} sJaquIEUT SIt SMO WIL sisqam EB Woy splomssed pux soulBuIasn poulEige saoq Syl = “ZT "UTaISAS UCYNQUISIP IY) $59098 O01 Jopso

Ur plomssed ple ‘oweLasn & poudisse aE Suaquis;A “suta{sM5 SUOHNGUISIP sit Salssdooe JO] day &

Case 2:12-cv-08333-ODW-JC Document 69-2 Filed 03/06/13 Page 68 of 104 Page ID #:1660

“(BOEOI $°O'S'A. 81 29ptIN oY ay JopUN sISIx0 BoNSR Jo TYBLE BEAR Y ,

- JO Sossalppe J] at TulApuop! pues saqoeaiq pazuoymeun ap Junosep UMA pasetoosse sysoa (| JO W1Os 2y} UI ssoT B parayme sey TonoNned ‘O00'OS7$ Jo ssaoxa ul susazsfs 1oyNdwWOd $ JsUONNEg jo genedur peznomnena SeOC] JY} OF SNP ssof & palayms sey sotloynog ‘zz “‘stequrats duyAed a1am Aoys Ysnoyy Se saoyzes pure BlEp peureigo ‘aUOHReg jo VoHEZOWNNE

oy} Moin pur ‘Ajdormouy Aolp *ssaode pazuoyMedn peuyes saoq AQ UQ “1Zz “SulajsA$ Jayndiwo> § Jauonnag

pessaooe JOUOTINeT JO VOHEZNOWINE oY2 INO pus “AysitjaouX sooq WL = ‘OZ : “UrosOLE OS yas ATny

Ff se poSayje-or Aqaiay ome sydussesed Suypaoesd omy ut poureynos suonesaye out, = “64

Sorroduasy, soyndura> “gq

{DEOL § “O'S. 81 2apun soc] om 19UIBTE

youoNneg Aq asnge pues pred Andwos Jo ustelo & woddns sioxy paSaye onoge ayy, “BT ‘anlses Jo wondaLaay Of onp paxLmoul $]s09 pire anueaer js0[ (¢ pak ‘saysearq amnng Sugusaerd pue swaisks Jondutcs sty jo youolg ai 0} Jond uoNIpuos May 0} swayshs Joindico sit TuLOIsal wy poyepoosse sysoa (z ‘paywrosse SSOU} JO SA8saIppe gy oY] FUAFNUSPT pus soyoeosg pozwoymeun ay) Fugoayap wr pareoosse $3809 (] JO WO} DI} UT ssOT B PAIOFNs sey JUWONTEd YOO'OSZS$ JO Sseoxe ur staysfs sods

$ Jouonneg Jo asnqe pie prey Ssoq olf 01 enp sso] ¥ palazns sey ToUONTeg £1 “ISROWOD JO SIaquosqns He ae uonued sig ysnony AyQuapt O] SHass IUOTINS S9Ocy AY], ‘Ssaippe gd] sip panssr dS} 1eUA SUTWAAIEp 03 JoWIeTUT aq} UO sasRqaIep dryxoo]-ssiaaar s[qepeae Ajorjqnd pasn souoNNHSg

‘peliieyioose s3am Sseoo PRJMBUN JO SUN pue ajvp pu ssoIPpE g[ IA sUQ “91

Case 2:12-cv-08333-ODW-JC Document 69-2 Filed 03/06/13 Page 69 of 104 Page ID #:1661

£

Aavonnag 40f kawiouy

SEI9-CSE-ZIE

70909 “TE ‘oSearyD

JOO}y WE

Joos aTESey "NZ 7

(96b0129 “ON Jeg) ‘bsq ‘Ang “Y Neg

407

OTI VAVOS

Ag

ZLOZ "OT LQUISAON :CALV ‘parnuans Aqguyjoadsay

“redoid pue isnf smssp un0| sip se joyariaypiny souonneg Supe (g) ‘SBAIPPY JONUGD SSPdOY VIPIAI « pus issoIppy [eUI-q e equinyy suoydeysy, » ‘S8OIPPY « OUR BULL » ois Fay payoeye “w MQMEXY UO pozst] sossaippe gy] IP MIM poleloassy siaquosqns oy jo disatlond SuAjQUspr SuPAoTO}. ay Fao WM) oO) Jsvawoy Suumber sopig ue Buvauq (¥) uewWdpHfl e FaqUe LNOD syLIwI? sisanbay KJmywodses suns Y ‘AYOATAARM “Ae | Je SUOKDE payedionur § Jauoniag 0} [eUaeU! St IYSNos AraAOISIP BY, ‘OE “syuepussap oq IMA oy ‘sao amp jsutese uOnOe ue Fup revONfeg 01 juspacerd ucpIpuos B st yorum

‘sdoq] TMouyUn oft Apyuapt O7 Japio ut yYSoOs Jarjor oy] O} TYBII B sey JOUONAG «—-*6Z

——————Case 2:12-cv-08333-ODW-JC Document 69-2 Filed 03/06/13 Page 70 of 104 Page ID #:1662

auONHed 10g Aetony 07200-S€z ($19)

9279 Ty PIASTIOG

JONG UBL SSM, TITS

‘vy { ‘tosduiogy

a Tomrsoy ‘ose ‘axoog 93996 19# ‘IsMIOOH *[, WAay

WA Wp] AG

mf;

Case 2:12-cv-08333-ODW-JC Document 69-2 Filed 03/06/13 Page 71 0f104 Page ID

#:1663

— saee ee Pen

a

\ ul + x

” We

HAY TAN Repo: wwe

GL NBOMS PES GSISTIO SR eS

“oe <a we 4 ee ‘ rd ” oi wa a” pal DY SUBS SUTAA STS Agu ey IBIS IPT peed iCLA PF Ss ME EE Safi PEIVSIBOT, wip Seu

\

BIS OF $2 TRS $9119] PED UORENUOPUY Uv 32 Of POHAT UIQLOY Suarient wy ve Meena Velo per

SOU FUE RUTTER TSE 2 IY GAOT IAs SpUBMTOMIS sap mee SOSUdA PHITTUApUN af ApsoOd 14427 $0 APOR ep $9 4Q)-7 Bowes es wmASNd wT <4 pativcid su Uinbed jo sanquunc spy NOTLY OIINIAA &

whee na ceeeeeenent ete

+

Case 2:12-cv-08333-ODW-JC Document 69-2 Filed 03/06/13 Page 72 0f 104 Page ID #:1664

V LIYtTH Xd

Case 2:12-cv-08333-ODW-JC Document 69-2 Filed 03/06/13 Page 73 of 104 Page ID #:1665

CE-OS-0C GLOITLOZ| OL BRI'ST be GSOS10 HO IT-CIOZ] LET BOL'ST'¥Z

OF ¥:LT 60-11-20

:

1O-LS°€Z €1-60-2107 Gv9TTZ OT-OL-ZL0Z OO-B1Z2 TE-O1-7I0%

™

SP:OP-ET 6260-210 GY-20°EZ NZ-80-TL0 Z| _SS'OELPT've IPEZ:E1 OLOI-Z10 22°¥1-bl 60-B0-210 OVOULE €1-60-210 OVOS:S1 31-60-10 OE:SE-OT ST-E0-ZI0Z €0:62:81 $T-80-Z10: ShES-10 1T-BOEZLO

m iJ

fo

SS-ChZ EOE TIO BESLE VI pz

Caml — o = we a Ww = | ms el Q NAAT S ALN

isn}

1S:Z€:00 TO-0T-Z10 LOLZZ LO-TT-ZE0 RECLE EVES O€06:Z1 S2-OT-Z10e LUSTGO SI-ET-Z102 LE60:2% OL-OF-C102 OS'S OVO] «EBD EC Pz] TUSEEZ 90-80-7210 6UIZET LO-O1-210Z

AUNTS

O€:92:P0 10-TT-Z10 EEGOZE 6C-DI-Z10 LeSZST OO F210 TZZULI 91-80°Z10 ZHGATS CULE TIO’ BOSEZO SO-TI-ZI0

QUN

m

:

EG EGIL TT-OU-Z10 BO201:Z0 PI-RO-ZIOZ EZ-87:50 EO-RO-Z10Z ObSZEZ CI-OF-ZL07 OF:EC60 SI-11-ZI0%

MS

POG L-0% OL-01-ZE0Z, x4 8874 QL'90:F0 80-01-2107 ELe'SLT Ve

an

LOSTS:1% S1-O1-Z10% ESHVITOL-BOTIO™] —sEP LOT T'#7) GLBSEL St-3 (2107 ¥B3'LP'ST EZ (O71 SO-OI-C10Z| — GHTESTOEL

(D.L.0) aunlayeq, SS2IPPY JI

mn

~

Case 2:12-cv-08333-ODW-JC Document 69-2 Filed 03/06/13 Page 74 0f104 Page ID #:1666

6C-EYO LT-OT 90:15:00 9L-OL-Z10 ELSIE POTTCOc] Eb’ GESTLD) BS:10:10 £2-66-710)

Lf 2s : a sd

N

bP 8b°90 TO-8O-Z1 0 SLOL'EOTLS LOSE OT EO-01-Z16' SP'EO'EST LO OETE-PO 9C-60°Z10; 66°P'E9°L9

Essa

HhO-HT OE-OT-Z10

i 6E:SEBT 0Z-80-ZT0z PESTEL LE-GOCTOZ

_—

Q

8 Blot 7

wa

o

n

a

ran NINN

N

61:90:10 80-01-210 LEIS‘EC BO-OI-ZIO ES:E:20 9Z-G0-Z10 OF:8OZI GO-O1-Z10 SESTG2 €0-O1-T10Z EEBE2O 6O1-ZTOZ| EST SZ TPT’ OS) OTISEO SOOL-Z0e] ELL be LPLOS £S:Sp:00 0€-60-Z10

OQ

65-9581 OE-GNCLOS| OFZ ELL TH1'08' PLZE EO SO-OL-SIOC] = PLU SLUGPT ‘0S

OSE CLESEECIGT Fee EST OPT OS SEZO10 1Z-60-Z10Z] OFZ SOT OFT'OS bO-67:6T 9C-OI-210 LS TEV Orr Os

™

BLPE0S POO “C10 ZE'76' 6210S

TE-Se- TL GLO C10i TPl'69°6Z1 0S

96:00: E 62-60-C10

a

OL:82:10 8260-710 pOZE0 9 1-01-C107 COFERDT 20-1 I-ZL07 pOPS:61 91-60-2107 026-50 OE-6O-Z107 LIULOVL 42 TOSS:LT LO-GI-ZL0Z PS TTLOSTOUTIOZ} BE PETS T'42 SP:0S:10 9O-E 1-210 66:66-0% ZI-IL-Z10z

/

GHLESOROILZIOe] ——-SE'S7e'st've 00:8P'91, 60°OL-Z102 LE'PEVST PZ

98-£5:40 GOT I-71

Case 2:12-cv-08333-ODW-JC Document 69-2 Filed 03/06/13 Page 75 0f104 Page ID #:1667

pO

4 ic . , id {4

NO ISO | SO

Ob-Sh:1Z 81-80-10 78'89°8S"3! BEES GCOTLLOT] «EST SST 89°89 TETS:S0 PL-OL-Z10S SB CET LSS

oO fo

SO9SLT SO-OT-ZIOZ ZS9LTZO SIUT-Z10 LEBEZO PO-IT-ZIO

SO [SS LO PNO fo

is! oo

OBL

91:1Zb0 Ol-f E-ZLOT EPZLO [Z-60-Z10% SOT2:S1 SILT ZO? S1-B¥:EZ 01-80-Z10Z 80'8S:2% BO-ET-Z107 9T0C-0C 8T-O1-E10E PEPEBE GO-IT-CLOG] — ZSEST'ILT'L)

LUETIED bE-60-ZIOT SC-OP:LO LO-EL-Zi0Z PL62:91 EZ-OT-Z1OZ SELL TI FZ10Z ES°61:02 22-60-7102

ZEZOST LO-L ZO LPESLEL ZOLTL0 LI-OI-TIGt] SEVSZTSLELY $S:91:26 $I-L1-Z107 ESRO%L1 60-11-2107 PUIG 1€-01-Z10 67LS:E7 OL-OL 9£:90°20 €2-60-C10 OLZEEL 9Z-OF-ZI0 ECLPLT 80-80-ZI0

XN

~é~ ni vt Te w o~t fac] ° p<] oS 775 nd be o|S SIRIRIN NX

nN

IZ:0€:10 91-80-21 F OUOT-P1 MO-OI-ZL0Z} ELL BELLO] OPP TS ET" ELVES Pl SZ-60- 710 €3°25°00 60-01-70

ca 4 N 3 wm id Qo a] be ca Set Red at aR SIRIRES

iN

Case 2:12-cv-08333-ODW-JC Document 69-2 Filed 03/06/13 Page 76 of 104 Page ID #:1668

tr

‘SRL STC D POT'SSe9T'9 SERCO SL GVEIT9r9 2UES BI GOLeIOe| ee ORT OT UST oe SOT L22'0ST'SE CET LODI-ZLO] «SL ZOLSI LSVEGLS'T OS br LS'I

; 0% 102

OEE LST LUELST Sb'06'6E7'1 THIS GEC T Z6'SS'6E2'T ESe'bY'GEZT LEP EET O81 LZGETT Gre ES7'6EZT LO'LET'6EC

TEDE-OL PT-RO-ZLOZ] «IST'S LEST O2'6tl GET I BS'SL6Ce I OST EL zz ; jz : r4

m4

re

~

SYEC BEET SITES S27 LET RET aeizal t9°g9'tOe'T LITES LOTT Pee RP 1Oe T SEOESI EI-Ol-C1Ot| OL OFZ 10T I LEVS2z 1001 OIZ007 1071 BIZOe 1021 ZOU9ET 10Z'T S98 POT | TC9L vert LOUSL'VGL'L €02'9' EIT RO LY Pel I a°857 ¥6l'l €£8°95:00 OT-L1-2102] = IOL'68T'PST'T OLUSBT PGT I TEC vET T2021 ET | OBTEZL'940'6

™

Case 2:12-cv-08333-ODW-JC Document 69-2 Filed 03/06/13 Page 77 of 104 Page ID #:1669

whiBO:L] EZGO-CLO] TF ZETEIT 86] CELOO SZ-DE-ZIOZ} = ES STTETZ'AG| SZ SOT C1Z 86 |_EPLS:€2 90-80-10] ShI"Z9'71c'86} 15 Z z

LE EP'GF:SO ET-OT-Z107

LUOPbT ST-OI-Z10Z{ —9S*ES'6Z'9L] CECESOST-UN-ZIOZ] SU 89'ET IZ]

Case 2:12-cv-08333-ODW-JC Document 69-2 Filed 03/06/13 Page 78 of 104 Page ID #:1670

SEZ 1G T1-OT-TlOZ| SET OeZ'L27'86 Coop Tz Le-OT- L-OFZ0 LO-1T-Z102 910560 17-60-210 OF:PO'ST TZ-OL E10;

~_ : ra!

a

N2SH90 BO-ET-ZT SILO LEC 86 LS-€€°00 SO-ET-ZI0 VO LOL'LZ2'86

~ a4 hia o Oo a ogoe ay ae 4 s RIRISIRIS

IST EIT 92296

CET ET TLOL-C1OZ] BLL 97086

MINOT ETBO-ZIOT} —- STBLT"927'R6 | PS'9S-bT LO-80-Z10|

VEPSRI TOOT-ZLOZ] —— PEZSEZZ' 86]

LELZ1 LO-OT-Z10Z

nN

EO-LE:00 ZO-DI-CLOZ)] = SIT TIT ET BG SUBELE LOL I-ZlOS} = LOSB9T EZZ'3: COBS'BE SOLUTIONS] LTLOT E2786

Z06°S0 POT L-ZT0 607 ZOl'L27'86 1:96:20 Z2-60-Z10 52°89'927' 86 1GLOGTLTERG

PS'9S-F] LO-BO-ZIOZ} = PET 6B E 22°36

(@-OELT £2-60-7T0 S77 C'EST BG

PUOGEL TE-6O-CLOZ} EGE SE'STe'86)

ZS:90:L0 SO-LT-ZL0z 2b7E0°01 90-80-Z102| ZLIZETEIT BS

OS9EET LUUE-TLOZ) ZEN TIT SEBS

Case 2:12-cv-08333-ODW-JC Document 69-2 Filed 03/06/13 Page 79 of 104 Page ID #:1671

POTS IO TI-OI-TIOZ} = PESGEVEST'BG LELEEC TOIT-CINZ «= BELET EST'BE BP FOOO ET-TI-Z10t] = LSS 81 ESz'86

6S:S1-ES TIL EZ Tb2ES:S1 OC-80-Z10Z} _8O7'GLT'RZZ'86}

[4

Case 2:12-cv-08333-ODW-JC Document 69-2 Filed 03/06/13 Page 80 of 104 Page ID #:1672

d LIGA XH

Case 2:12-cv-08333-ODW-JC Document 69-2 Filed 03/06/13 Page 81 0f 104 Page ID #:1673

se] Q)E-ASE § § SITE OZL spun amerg atp sspun sisPKe woROR Jo 1YSp emtated y ,

“HUNS STI} Ut Sooc] ot jsulede Suusdurey sandwos puy osage pae puey Jandaios Jo suey Snug Aer JauONeSd Jy) OS VONEULIGJUr siq] Oo] PapHwe pue ur paysaiaqul St JavONIAg “ssod 3u} AFYUOP] 0} pas aq Acty yey UONBULIOJUT Jo WO} Joyo Aue puE ssezppE OVAL ‘ssarppe freuro — suoydeles ‘ssaippe ‘owen sty syaas Jauonueg gz “SAQLIOSQAS AOC Ted TOGA O1 “Is¥OtOD Aq pus a0 Yous Gy Ajo UMONY St SoHNUApI an SIO] OY) JO YY ‘SAVWUSpr stl $soq] Dl mouy OU svop soVeNNeg “17 “S20 OY) UTese IYSNosq sUNe[S au} Oy Ajsed pry JomNO Jo ssoultm Ajeraur JOU pue ‘Aued pemoe ue oq |] JouonNeg “soc om ysuTESe touONteg Aq Suusduyi doyndwoo pur sgnge puy pary Jaynduios Jo suey oddus Soup padaije eaqge oy ‘ae “E-9L § S SOT O%p ‘Auvodwey, sandwoD pus Heo! § ‘D's’ gf ‘AV asnqy puR prely Jaindnro; suk Jo Lonejors anp ut silavek’ rayndiwoo pajsajold s Jovonueg Ol ssa00e pezHOyNBUN ures 09 splGmssed peyoRY sIOW JO ao pasn eq yey =z “UrBISY WO] Jos AT[NT Ji 8 posayle-ar Aqatoy ome sydesdemd Surpooaid oy) ul poupeyuos suopesaye ay, “¥Z AUFAOISIG LIDS Wad 7 ag9l §¢ SO'T O@z Topun Sunadurey, xanduoD Jo wrpjo 8 uoddas syovy paSayje saoge SUL “Ez ‘SOTAJaS JO UO HANS O1 NP PaxInoU! $1900 pie snuanal Isoj (¢ pues ‘Soyoverq auniny Auyuereld pue sutajsks Joynducop sti Jo yoverg sty 07

Joud voNpuce Jey OF suTaISAS soynduios su Sunojser TIM palelsosse sisoo (z ‘poyersosse asoyy

Case 2:12-cv-08333-ODW-JC Document 69-2 Filed 03/06/13 Page 82 of 104 Page ID #:1674

{ONS SABY [IIMA AOUY Sms BUIYAUE Sutty? ),UOp | PUBY JOY}O a4} UO, “PIES eIANYyY ,"y PUNOZE zzng yoni 00) Sealy esneaaq sueld Joy) uopuee Ae ayy ‘oijqnd aucB aa,am aouo jeu} soueYO aL] Ss! duayy,

"YOUNR] Pino SHEN ou) Uaym sa ‘aud pey ubredwes juswiinioa ay1 Buoye se} Moy aunsun

SEM LONOYPNEI4 YSH Jeu pappe ays ‘UOWeaRUSYING LO;OB]-OM] SSN OF SaUNsHOS eiinba, ‘aydiuexa 40} ‘SyueQ UebSdOINA SWAg'svajSUE! asm 20} Pd/Inba! WOBoHUEYING s0]9B]-OMY.1O YOR; B SB aM Sse ‘sosualap tay) Buneeq ul ssecons jsed jo asneoag syle ursvawiy Buyediey $1 Sued ay) pies you “ples eianuy ‘aiyoud yBiy pue umouy jam Weyl ;o Auew 'payebe) vaaq avey syueg oe se Auew sy

« WINUUIULL 2 OQ) Seuneubls enibiun dasy

PUB PHM GY) U; O42 SeUNJBuBIs srulAnue Aue Moy jOIUOD UBS AAly ‘seqty ajquinsexe dn Guyi6 Ajo Ag “Laydwos aut uo pyoy Uh) & Burdeay 5) SueG sy y Y90/9 PLB Wajap Oo} SIOPUBA LO§ AMOUE 8d [IM 1

"1 UUM JepiWey aq JOY Yoyeo 0} Ajay] Ssa] O22 SeinyeuBis SmuIAHUE pUe S1OpLian AuNdas,, ‘pres ejanyy ANG OF BUOAIAA JO} JIQEIJEAR JOU S,}1 [EPEWO Jo SAQATE 10 g] Sty, "UMmOoUy flea jou st uefos} s|liL,

“lrysseaons 31 UBieduied aig jf ‘ssepsue2) TUgINpNBaL pUe SauyoeW pas|wosdwiod yo 1equwnu au seusy Og dn Guise; aq pinoo syueg *a]BOS JO PULY SIU] UIA ‘suBiedWeo [fjssacans u) diay 0] Siajseeuiog penpinipun aay se ma, se Aa\dap shueB ausoragde "Aile;auex

sajepdn 204 Bueb ay) uo juapuedap syinca) ay} Sujdasy ‘ssaydwoo

$,uefol, au) dn earB you jp pue ‘sued 2194) YA Say aqeynoaxa aseys AjUO jim Bueb oy) ‘ospy ‘pappe eanyy 'vefos: BypeLUL [2055 34) Aoidep o; moy ui Buje pue eyempey ul) juaWESeAU] jegiul ue Buuinbar eve pue 'syjold ey} jo [no eB spnioga Jjouy Busiwaid ee siexypeye all "uoHOYpNely YSH 40) IsyeOeds sUOQeaTUNWIWOD sUULdagAd “eiANyly sOPY ples ‘HOBNe payzanow Ayeoueruy

B uy eledigied 01 Suepisjno paymoes sey uopezjuedio ewuosagso apeayd & SUI} SUI GU} S$ SIUL

‘Teor, zoe) Ve endoid 9tj jo ween e Bush weos Buppely syopiw-oy)-ul-uew papzorcioo & u} ayedjayed O} Ba|SewjOg QOt 0} dn Buyjinsoes Afeaqoe st GueB awrdsegds 8 yeu} sonpap of Sanp snaven

1ene8o} Ind sey pug seyeus punabseoun Bupoyuouw uasq sey Wee] Gowesal Uagsypnely s yoy

“SJOJSUB!] SJink UaINONBY f:0 Buyjnd uo JuaQ YOEYE Papeuipyoag ayeos-eHey & 10, SBA/SSLUSLYT IBIq O} aneY UOOS At ‘shep OF Ised OL) Jano INO payies Spee SOGG jo weans 2 Aq passays Apeaye Siuos ‘syueg Ubooluy JOfeW JO mals Y

Osu eyaTH Aq

Syuvg WesLOUury 10 Speny WALLIN 8[899-05.187 10jy sroyseunog SUL MAIDY SULT) DUILIO10GA-)

WASELZL ‘*Z102 “b deqoisE

Case 2:12-cv-08333-ODW-JC Document 69-2 Filed 03/06/13 Page 83 of 104 Page ID #:1675

‘el0z 'p Leaver ua pasojo Ayeonewoyne aq fim ajay sit! uo Buguaunwog

«'Apyaind yno yseo op uem Ady “swuajsfs 4184} Ueprey Siasn pue syueg ay) [RUN URS Aety se yonut se ayew 07 em ABUL, “pres Bunyy ,"Usedwes yon e aq Oj s1y) JO} Guryoo] aie Aayy,

‘ples WSy ‘Ayaroe Jessues pensnun

0} wel Bunsaye 1x6) 10 129 UOLeLUyUOD B BurAjeges WO WIOIA OU) UBAaIC ijn Jeu} aremyos Guipaoy. euoyd 410A Aaidap srayoeye oly Yoytn} cals & y Buje) ‘elisqem yUBQ ayy Busseooe WoUm aulysew PesiWOIdWwOs SLy JO Ssauppe gj SUINUAH ay]. UO INOge GAOW US Us? WejSAs [ENYA PaUOK Sy

"RIES YSY 'SUIJORLU SUNDA BY] LA pel[eIsU| UoWOSUUOD AxoJd SHDOS B

JBAO jG PAWED Sf SSadoy “SIUNOIWL JIG] SSSDIE PUT SUIYDVLY S,LUQIA ay} BPEUOSMadwI O} US]SBWIOg OU} SMOIE SILI “PIES YSH ‘VanBoyNuap! aeMyos pue ‘UoIsIeA Pug adAl Jassolg ‘sapjono ‘UaHMasas UGAl0S 'SUOZ AU SP LYANS seinjeay BaEy Ep! Buyprjouy alndisos sw ayy Sayeoydnp uay} ainpow eu! ‘ainpow Bujyouds SUIYOeW JENA B GN sory JaI9BUI0g SY ‘PeyoUNE] S| UBIO! OL BUG

“JOAIBS JO1JUCO PUB PUBLULWOD ay] OL. Suoda yaoi oy LQ 2 pure ey) ajqeinoaxe UE ‘OM SoH BNJEWILE ayUA ‘WUSLUAG(Cap uadn $}0Q 0} S15 10 SfBujs e selya [Za5 WUasayiP $1 SUBIO!) ONY BU) 4O JUaWAOIdEp Ing ‘Ales WSH ‘IZOH) Se 1sy J8B6u1 TYA pue wzayed voyeoiunuwod JeAJaS-0]-10G WES 34) SEEN EMBL

“SIBAISS BJEMBWUID SH OF Sueb semadqied sayy Aq UaniB yoyed 7pyC Ares uj SiweU J8pj0) B 5) PUR ,GATOIOZ, PsOM diy 40; UEISSNY S| BX/EWWIUL ‘yaa SE YOBNL SHy) AULA Ss! ‘syIeNe i209 snoiaesd oF Pap sem You Wee, dAbuey, 3u} UOB|NIeds Of Buipesy ‘ples you ‘sloedse peuogeado ue yeojuysa} ut Ueloi) [205 uy O}

FERAIS SI BY/BLIIU ‘SBSSO| PElE|a/-pnevy UW UOKINY o¢ 10} Sjqisuodss PUL QOD? AouIs UOE;NOUd Ut usaq sey YoIyM ‘eos! SxYewpUN, (205 ay} 0} LOOBUUCD aLQ eYeW oO} BIQE Jem SJeYyQeSSaZ SY¥SY

« SSBOONS JO BOUBYO SLUOS Gaay 1/118 P,AaUy $2U} ‘GuoIM OB pros Tey] AtNoas ui eunpey jo sjulod Auew os pue arqepene suefor; Ayew os aie slau! “WweLy} U0 Pays ayewWeIp B

Case 2:12-cv-08333-ODW-JC Document 69-2 Filed 03/06/13 Page 84 0f104 Page ID #:1676

2 LIGtHXxa

Case 2:12-cv-08333-ODW-JC Document 69-2 Filed 03/06/13 Page 85 of 104 - Page ID

#:1677 ef LDS FERSOSA LAI -J8qA9-.ey-yoeIOe-20-c LOg/Alajsyemaupyoequion Agpovesr QEABBOLeSN gajes Asp 361] $ auoud addy “RUBUNDOP anyauas sayjo pus syesadoid yooqesey Buppag ‘sivaled “$1sy ssywo)sne |aajs 03 -awes pus Algaoosip aapualeo veteyy aly YsCaalt sfuaduice aig oul daap aqaud Aquajed

snot” O} PJOYsO & Se SUS WY Susn vsy ‘soADdWe BLO

Zhoroc-puedey anes (aay sjeus] jo Jajnduics aly Buysajuy Aq ulbeq Aqepeawy sysene 342

aaron Ayeckt ydoolig SefS6nij= yew veused,

ayyAeded OBL ensjaez Beg pz “SJEZA UEZOP sey |se0 Jy} waAd AaiURduIGS 1O SpUeSsNoY}

SOOpiA JO syosgan ayy au; pagoes9 BABY Jew ‘Buifeg ui “LRDES AY IES fuD es Cupmar JAD Syy {(ByYSuRYS uy poseq sue ‘shuek JeQks aGse] amy (POYSOR T9tu OUOMEE NC WEIR Str Sins Olmedo TIBETITA Biz PAHO HAWS 19 0r ype ely Suyeiap yaueases pajuasald ‘yoieasau Tas & POTN TO E Se tom; Bae ELAN LET aE

payee Abaled, YONG o3Gy KIS ef 3,000) OCal Tet OTT OTOH ANIL OUD TOUTE i laa il Benpeud jO JOSIP SYSOAATINIGS [139 “Wess wu

sald GaORIY AH AD SeUNE “SSoIppe ajoukey spyndeg soy $ Uy FAIPUS)B COS'S SUIOS PyO} “UN OWpRIEqsD SIGs. 2] JO PeSy satWOS UU UMeYS ,"Ua@sIS3ap ssatu jo Uadees B UEY|JOU;G ‘Ppom Palins @ CB 290} aM eal Propuen iy WeryUss saw sty, seudwos spepe peyeleussi-jousnpy P1325 Rs TY “HOON SIUt Slay PAPMAVNS Jey} SaUaJaIVOS Aypraasiaqés yey song yE|6 ayy UE BuAEdionied suadke JOUIOYU} Pure Aynses so snsussu0d sahwS9 oy} Sse “SWOT 0} SUBeK JO) SoLieEdLUaD

pue Sfenplnipu! 0) 7884] Bulnos Aipeays e asod o) Asx] S| ~ TUdUOUWUA Aysp Apeaye -yewenu] ag s}saBEns jeu, ated e je Bun evaysvos ave syoeye sagko - SyYOaA SY

cA aadsy

yorebsey Aq posamog

a3ay Aw ancy] iGiuy adeys pasanbuey sadkys samog WSL STATS aU Aged

aft AU Mad Ae

{Rap 9204

woogeyia atRSTATSIETT Taanyp wrest fA wee 8 wits EGIGALN VW aon rsa ire | stuess AHSIRSITZ Y FRY

“ pont be

Uy paearaUT 9q Kew nok cOaRIA syoeyeiaqAs Joy JuBis ul UMOpMoy|s ON

, 3 rs, ‘ zo} Q fF Site oe j ‘Stet: > +? ee PEGE wen oREUY Meals

WOO" AVOG LWSN) — SHDEEITGAS JO}. pu Fs Y] UME AMOIS ON tos “s1grob

Case 2:12-cv-08333-ODW-JC

ama th re hee & ecitn, gsr seq dns lag (| once ee

gvIndOd

LSOIAI Pin onots UByd avpitod Iso

_ Sep ng jo ssod Arunulwa> plic

sSoveeb oud ‘seucs panes do)

. Some 3386 0; dn GBI

APHOESMAN PRUAg seindog yIOLy

#:1678

Document 69-2 Filed 03/06/13 Page 86 of 104 Page ID

“CSUN WW SAALOD Abe YS Sia 2992 PAU AIO POO! HO esraued CYT yO ADI WS ye sade ay Ue x, bey 0119 “O2NQe 2d tres LOday Of jworatne? Aint poy uayrabe w0Ceses oj: 3 ARON Te Hot Of VAEUSEN Jas) PATUE IS uF Zpvoud! O) RTOS Saye put SIUIIS VIO uO HUTLLOD Woogaaays Cer AS travoos

2] ters Neo {jes PAPA soapy ofeuBog urai4 wee veg no, souUL +

oie ceomccercs THOM MGI, SOHN Y) (OWWMMOD WOYTeMYSHY INO, PEO] O1 MOY

CD TUG CD soja “UD UC Jodeayy aq srs ILA PAOID

vez sBoRy ag nian Bury Gig aN saddle

ara ray az SIL GACH BAW NOR “pews aney nA fH

TON OY Wiody BOW

ees ly HOG .VZQUESA IIUY § Dud! drys 0] suOsda F

SAON YO AUSCLYO? REPUTE {RYU IS Of MO Lids sopvediwas Lopsays strutjoD

SRT OTS OD AIO Aad Bajoyd purity aod yne sap ssapdos 239 Ssoyang quay

HIRDLAD sD Ar AOD AR YEO daAgiaod AIH 32M ais Guyetagzs Jor PU a/25 Syly UC

AVOOLYVSN Woy a10py

HY OCs OL SeG2BQsrs OSA Tv og: Sl zrsae Kooy

ws fe pKest tuoradDs OY OL “sup aRtues 04 LL VOpe Ayres 2D} Bes pus AYO Vequind sleagy “auscy Sonja) wweodepore NERcoe OF SeeytagD lls “redueleter S47 ay UOPENOISUS LOVED GIT 103 “SD8SP TUT. Oy SOAS PUMIS Ot "Funded unijo eat SuOgsOv.09 Node? OL TOW R MOIS MOREE AUied PB hn Meg unyuuntpy MCW: Mey

“OWE 10 UOISHAIR 8 “Woy Wen Ajsnoas

fo Jaagjo Aqunzas seiyo ‘ZENG a]ppq sted ,'Ads ueuiny @ ul PUSe OF SACY UBL] JaLyex "Buyyes Buu ue U| Aadosd fanysalequy (says OF to =» YURA e O}UY EM 0) MACY VEY} JPYISL “YUNIIB YU SUING ue Woy FEUOW feats 0} |CURAVD # 10) Jajs8 pus Ja|saa sz,

‘$adInTp apQo

PSQoULOS-TAUPO}LE PUES SHIjAIGS PAAA[ap-joulaju] asowW sas Aanos se BuyAdjynwy ae spongy sfueduios e aqoid pug ssecde 10 'Qq SyenpyA Puy UE yD faUOD Ba} OF JaRrAIYj UB 10) Saqjuruodde ‘esow 23 0tAA “Op Jol a[qQeyone Apap que SwesBosd Oupyoey eon-o}-Ase9 ‘inianod asnraeq Aped ayeass o} OiiWOS Syoeye gam hes Suadcy

“shes Tesoy ‘coyey We}6 yosaS

Aue UP AUT] Bye Hupyoayey (enos saawsnq ‘AuewueLs ays Buppeviysjely ‘soddez JORG QUITO WOY UdO}S yep UyyA HnUcoas poueddey sJey, “ep UaOIs SUL JO 'poceb pou p ‘awas Suysod Ayeoygnd Aq— Guyseag Aafia stayey ausgan Iryssacons agg

“Syanyuery vadirip fo worsinipl a “SOUO¥AH) way ANTES a19qeM to SOE UE jBIUaB ‘AaVGy| Pine BARS Blep BIQeNTeEA 1oyjO pur

sploagsed pur eaueuaEN Sues sosequjep YOeaG O} Sha 10) aqosd SpPuRlUO se

4B SawIPsO SPUesMoOY] UNIIO AyetENO MOU S'BNS BUSqarg ‘Sopsqars AUEdWOO uD yng "SOg JENPAYPY} us Jou "saga dn Gurddays s| ssapey jo AsGoyes usrayiD 8 'eptUEDY

; ‘squnovae Sunveq aujua WO} Srapsua ly oA Juan prey Guyensayaio Ayspeds onreiany SH jad Aved o} pagn ala YUM jo RUOS 'SOd PayTOPUE GOG'sZg Of $39072 Sey Ajuauna AueG aig pes ss02>-aUI0}S

‘qzemyos snopjent Neha

SHOU) Jeu BBed gant e 0) Jasn ay) Saye aAaMOY

‘SUI RYE SIHQ SUOydHSO JO SUOEAISTO! BUl[7E '432/Onu] Aaayap snGoq peed oF HUI G YO NOI 0) sugHonySUy AEs soSessay oui “stay wads psed dys 0; pousisop ‘weds 4nd Guyserq usaq sey 'sSo1d-eUOIg UR TUTIEsSE, Syoreimnoes peg 4q pazdjaun ‘Buak sayouy

wCadkopuue yusueyiD @ Guje8 94 "yASQ eos AS “NAOmou @ JO [no pays 3H pue POsOKCI3|p 185 Op ASU ft USAT, EAD} Shes ,pUdISISJEd

ESSE AER Roe

ps AUCH-OB S95 Ftd

ubis ‘aincy seopUR GROs CIR FHLOISIC, SIT SRO Coser

Say, MAYS WORN CO oP FUGis 2540 Burges @esarad upey sha osu ayer 162 B

SUIeY poy STL

“sq tak tugs} 219) weal gnu ULaIS pve aus ‘peeds ain pow Las mPI

pue Ayyeays, 348 Jeg HDB UT SH;Os APEyUSUEGWO?

GuAaid saakqqdlua jo suazop Jo dn epew 3 Gueb yey

UT] peJosueds

. ey

Case 2:12-cv-08333-ODW-JC Document 69-2 Filed 03/06/13 Page 87 of 104 Page ID #:1679

C LIGIHXH |

Case 2:12-cv-08333-ODW-JC Document 69-2 Filed 03/06/13 Page 88 of 104 Page ID #:1680

thes deyday quay y-uajo]3- AneBene-sproa) nap-aeide-uegniu-} <aeuajarmrexoeyr fF ADCS ATMA pas

; « ASD'[SJUT SBIABP SOL WEAON,, papa doyJsap $2124g Uo aly 2 Ul paiois 319M Sy ay) Avs stayoRYy ayy

. "Wes |, suodsay BoUaplag $.20]JO [Gay ¥I0 x MON

ayy pue Uva, UOHY 19qQAD [euoay $.neaiIng at} Woy [Zuelg yf JeydoyswgD pause juase rqaz ue 03 Suigsuojaq doydey e payoey Aeq i ‘Gorey Ise] Fe} BIOIM srayoRY sq] ‘auto od AyWSug] B Uy ‘SOYS Wat0} Uo peysyqnd sy paydAnus te ul MONI fF Afuo paseayar nq ‘JaIndwied Igy poyouy oq} WOG ‘oyeULiofUT Teuosied StypNput ‘sqy UoYUt Zt ajoys Apenqoe Aay] Aes sasyoey ayy, “payovy fay] rayndwioo [qy ue wor poureyqo Aoqy Avs Aor} perp} sqy aoraep ajddy vores 1 paseoyes sey aaguury duoi8 Fayoey OT, Pan /o10Yug

LBUZUNS Agziog Wd 6P:2et et'vo'6o

1OyINY Temyseyez wy Ag

doydev] [gq Wig UsjoO1g ATpoS2TTV SalI esa a[ddy wor F esvopay SAoyoe TT

yh SaaS wz Sette gH. Ayanaasyaq AD Syoeip pus syoeyy aug AyLinaas pue amir ‘Morag BATT JeOAY |

woa'palya, {19457 way | daydey pq Wor UIIOIS ApsGany sai srapeyetddy

Case 2:12-cv-08333-ODW-JC Document 69-2 Filed 03/06/13 Page 89 of 104 Page ID #:1681

L4G Coydeyag suds -UEO)3- A[pabope-sp|-d{ nap-Bydds-uaytws-p-sseapg s1dysey/ "748 ANNE SY WO po iyn Apxeqog Aq syury payepy ONT FYSHY NO A paqypay ‘paseayad siayoey olf} Fel] SOU Suoure St QIAN addy say}. j yay 0} ssasn Joy [OO & payeadd sey GaN FXAN OUL, “SCLICO Per} yey) saoneoydde supjoefar weFaq addy ‘qady sey ‘ursyy yous} ple “UOTEULIOJUL FaYIO YIM Pouiqmio tay “1esn & APJWpt O} SIsyjo pues siadosasp uoeoydde Aq pasuistiu aq aes Avy) souls ‘sadtAap Ur 8,q1] a4 Surpoo-p.rey 10; paznio useq sey ajddy ¢ PST FY} CO SIGUMO PIULGIUGD SOY] LOF SJE[ OO} $41 BSB SY] UR ‘Yam Jag “+ AVUILMI CIGH a0) Jog seatyeutayye 40} Fupyoo/ st addy Jey SuLMmowy sty sseoyes 0} juawow TESA og} $71 YULGI om, Gsod ouyfuo rey] Ut ej01m Asy} ‘“asneoaq os[e pue seolasp NoOqy SayoeI} aq AU Tad 94) WET} Mouy prom aydoad Jey} os sqian addy ay; paseajar Aoyy Aes srayoey aqL

"AlBNHAGaT Se] DUTP poysod pue papsooes snow Adouy jo susquisw yoy.

‘HOISSHosip OY} 10}. Faquimu uy-][eo & pep frewa ary, ‘sdnors Sanpey aaqjo pur snourAuouy JVeSYSOAUL OF S}oYe durssnosrp [[¥o aoussayuoo & wt ayedn.ted oj jouUossed Juewuso20p18

-Me[ URAdOIY poe “Gf WaZop [e1eANS 0} Jugs sem [LeUI-3 ayy, “ArenueL Ise] Paidao1a}Or snOMAUON YH JO STaqwatt JBYy |IeUI-3 Ue UO SBM VY] asuzIeq Psjesie] UVaq saBYy Aeut [sueIS

mores pemjay Aiday Zl dag¢

daghuys ‘ueg JaydoysimyH VSS IGA SYGeyy ‘saataap SQ! psyorT] pue paygnuspr ooo‘ooo0‘er Oulsnowyouy® Majed Jylsnowkuouy 4 “SIIST. YE} OF VOEUIOJUT SY3 Sarsu sem [aT oy} Jey ‘Junoose DysnowuAaouy® oq} at] WO Jaan] B UI PoysaFsns srayoey ayy, ‘sqy addy aqy passassod pqy ay} Ay Umouy Jou $37 ‘solAap addy qova oj anbiun st yetyy Berrys Nroumnueygdye Aspereyo-oF e ale aqEIN addy ‘SCT 91} 1OJ WorpetIopA [enosied SupAueduroose a4] asveyar jou prp pure “12AeMmoY ‘sq IdN UoNFUT T Afuo paseozar srayory - ay], ‘sasserppe ple ‘srequimu suaydyea ‘sapoo JIZ ‘suayO} sdtarag WolyeOyLION Ysug addy ‘saotagp Jo sed4q ‘sgoraop jo sated ‘soured rasn ‘(qq f) stegnuepy sopaeq subir) Zurpryou ‘saoraap Sol addy wort s1 we] alOW Jo [Sy] B PaUTeuod “sreyowy ax} 0} SuIp.roooe ‘ayy ey

woo'paays [eaay jaan, | dapdey (gy wary ur|Oxg A[paBayy $q) SaIgeQ addy

Case 2:12-cv-08333-ODW-JC Document 69-2 Filed 03/06/13 Page 90 of 104 Page ID #:1682

A LISTHXa

Case 2:12-cv-08333-ODW-JC

at

(ayassaBenys

Agadiday) GupaypeS Aynoas sayyduaa sey] X2tjg 94) 18 saxyads @ypudNy ayy sam La} MEY [BIY7 YUN ALlgd 28GA9 14.4 AUIS

—

[ase | as | SioREnee wees ee

. aupy)

Document 69-2 Filed 03/06/13 Page 91 of 104 Page ID #:1683

*“PIPOND=Spopevan matipxdlOlLasaxodosaago ce |sbs qapiepesnatpaseuwosabaod wva

“pres Aon J I4ay en jane Wot aye) pue eBued unop 19B oO} pag BAK,

"HESY OF [easy] Jag BH) XEq 0} POM Uy 198 OF AND HOA MON Uy NORTE $11 SNOWERL] acy pO UNjaEA yaLUE UY We -BxEy AeUE I} eYl Pasay Aruapy

Wiig dng yanfand | Auaua oy) yyBy of Aern Suh, ‘Mab seaqy poo8 $2 youre ae fal) put saAnse) ay ued | ing ‘Auue we estes yudoy ‘tava quurt uaa 5.

“PNAS Of Spudina pajosdens Guia SaedwOD uy "oye (089; uo yyGno} og osye araHIsHE JaqA> joy; DIECdOUd sso

«2438 OU PUB ep YIUgN UOdN spuddan Y,

~dysrpul Hensss saydwos ay} ave wjoar saysey ayy uy Sajal Say (Hoge paddiih Ssopy NS JOU Wy SIU paWOs VIHAR td) | Ld 4 ‘ayn { wa OS,

“SOSSMPPE V1 3GEA TPL WA Vlg SAUSOMO VOI SUAQUION pue SaUEN PeUoyy sy 10) oResadog wu ath 18 AyNoes yO Pes 5] sTeVY

4 S¥ureui ah) asic, Oo; Ausiwliids AuAdas andi aif) ue Buyaa ‘pes ssoya ceoye'ieonk + pied pug spa ou) ysrd on Gulu wefusdwos lasayy (no Ss POI ayy QWs poTU WH SOAR,

uaustiue Auer] peyoag ‘ABDEINUL UO asst SUa}$ Jeut Bupayye6 vod fag snaoyal oy pulYag axocy paCOsep)sas oy} "SsOY) LEC sapUTO} Jey NDEI

Bushian Wot} fo FouOBT up UOd] doyS PUL $) Arespe any ayM je XOO) Oo] SEY BAK, PIES Pen < OREN BURT AOE voN Alexg pure Aysmanun Cee ‘ya Aton "payne Aldad aye {ues fOA,

2d o aienyos anraau pasa iin Seu eo soya is voanen JO. (Ut UBS {Od Of aenyos yAVAloU ue ue 9t}}2 Jagd psyusp o} Gujpuonisar IR onde dey] SUeOWW pe re olntd pe Rug ed sinouieat

SUONIE BOIS SHEE Usd aM “of ABERNOT OU CYS PURISIOPUN dm J, "DIES AUB} S14) 10 He oy kay aig sf BouDBigarL,

SOHpunds jUmaped Uy sopusie poUdaNjue Mel IAs pe Aysnput py) U] sep oy) GuLeYs Ua) pu “pesn sjam) ay) ou oleate Aap oy OE UageLWEyU, GuvayleS spnjaur pindys sHeprutl] 72Q49 BuluGy 0) TO)9BR

i; : 0 TAY) 19) BES YL Dy MBEAN, ‘Diae Aud a TUEU eta |sAu) Ue Sy} ‘punars 46% PUB RAR AlY JO} JBN 12D [IA AlewaApE POO sdOs OL, -

: . oyna Aq put paliueyd JO nsssaeoe useq ~ avsy Gahy saljpatyn te Gans saltn|joe wages Cupoqwous Oyu SayEjaUes ely ‘PuarA JONAS JUN Uy

2 Sainuln, $05 Bujyoo) ‘Buyyuny Anuesuos a4 Of Bed BAA, “CIIUO PLOM 103) Guysanend of AUNaas seyndwos Eupende ‘pres Aro ,WaIOLULad G1n YI}EAA 03 (BnouT pou Sj IB,

"yBhmuy paddis BARY aly, AydING ‘uo souEByieIN Suyayes pur coy Buszorem Spain oF Haru) asyUe [oujeha spenbayss ABO nue Seay ‘S|peMn Gulpiig asf pul jauasze Si uedxe 0) Arig Aipitzes saicduio> wy,

‘SOpESIONO? GulAywrop| pue essucd se wopjoy yee veqds 4 Burzgemeds axmigpmouy daymys 18 UOISsPN B JO pRay out ga Unjaas ayeued ayy ay PAYmnyss [fidy Ly AuUazS ‘TR4 Bub OY DUlylomjo Stead #2 JebY

310090 UDNYIG E'S FROGS Serr joy) PSYTyD | PUNT IRE] PUL, ‘PONY WOS ay , Avedias Aue ‘uoesuebo dus YoeNe Ce? puora ayy Y) REAQMATE "Apog Mire wongeuns yay] Lee yyy, Codey goss B UW,

pee Auay Wezyenba jea6 ayy siseqay,,

“siHojou Aueduicg 20 obpepwuy Speul inva saDfoMdLuD PRNUUOS A O) SRUWHO papITy-]PM pus sais Woy Suldue ¢euesianps vee 8 LO pale! ay

‘fsuaqy 0) Byypucoae “arajnduio> JRMEI 0 sesoyteus no Gufia rd pup Gu pnom dapat AlGurssexaly sani wePOUs Se Fue JeUayU) Sy} Uo Apt wow fue suo_sesuel PaUeUy ‘sp YS Joo ‘sepddrt jaja oe TAUB usd a

SUDRONUAESP SEBLU jo LodaaA.B UBYL JAMO "Prova Patt hs 8a 990) aM Posy ]UeIS MBs TOU sus a] APeITE paWjeU AyndwoD Woy yeRULT AY] ah31-8q |,

Guages swe, anosas Hersey 40 Ospp apewresp YiyA YO Poop LeU] CORewesad BOUdey [ey HIe1g 2 ULpmS Auay aveyg ,2Mou pulls pposssaq Ao ey; Uy Ajssmaqied 'sayuraua uno pyGy O} ioWam peat ay,

‘ayn yay Bugaayud of

SOWIGD Ht alpA BIUAZO ee, Uy YAS “8 10} Lis fipsn gays Tere Guys sSqAD peg BUCY & LYWHA peueds way Guyayab Ajyrioes sayhdlwoe yy ysa[g snoiqsard w ye sbuyaug jo Aap y8g AY sypene

ob palucya] Supeysenep pumoid Oo} sROpiAg DUNG JOU pus sispauE) ‘sens ‘suBySeY ByeURMTA Pur UND fury O] PRGiN erant ARPSeupany ud cuOKWwEYd Aypndas saINHLOD — SYOAA Syd

ic SOs “9S HE — fgsty) Uday uUiAID Ag BSUSYO ou} US Of oO} pahin siapugjep weqh5

Jepsen Muswnseg peu sacsy asaqnine, Atig adeyy cabsu) tpaeds noO,e

SSUSsyo ayy UG OB of pafUn srapuaysp yags5 gay PAN TIE

Case 2:12-cv-08333-ODW-JC Document 69-2. Filed 03/06/13 Page 92 of 104 Page ID #:1684

we "PL EING=PROBLVEAT AU PX IOLOSEXDOOSASN9 CSOs Ty/ah 18/0} o/ana Upapsatyi93'a]5006 Maya

EER ee me ET ROR Oe Ae eT me RET ION EUS tee mmeETiY erate teen Pe eM ede: ee Wee Bia

abedownpy 3/8009 sod 0) IKON bey. XS of er,

¥O% = ‘2S Fa25 4574 INO AL ‘Wy 4200 Salus aio Woy ALE < ; Felon UU WOs USA TS “Mon ‘$094 DUAN NOs, BOGxy -uopeynsuay y aping aasysgayonh g

i

*eeiGap 253(jo> auyug fi€ Sapo | wy 12 WSyoua AUD ApnTs

[Sy F284 Squeg ‘sd £tz padwnf qoss spate Woy] ayduns 7

uen

« GOYE vIwRey cb py “day chez 4p GE a YON We Ssyeys ay) Soedluy ue EY Yeo NO SlOMEM HAIAD poddinda-tar, "paupeepieot sy, FTUdHO SY) UO 05 DY pabin suepuajep I9GAO “day Zst9/04

'

Case 2:12-cv-08333-ODW-JC Document 69-2 Filed 03/06/13 Page 93 of 104 Page ID #:1685

T ‘AUATIOR Surpsey oy} LOJ pasn ao1Asp Iytoads ay} saryNuopt IU Joquinu v Si sssIppe OVI V ; INOWITA, “S80 OI WIA oyndsip SuLraduryyz sondwoo pue ssnqe pue pues Jaynduros st gayosaz 0} HONeMTOUT sty] os ATUO TIM JovONHeY “ssoq{ OY} Jo Ssomppe (. DYA,,) [OUD ssa00y BIPSTAL Puy ssemppe [ieta-o ‘raquinu auoydeyel ‘sseuppe ‘oueu ann ay} ssopOsIp oO} seoUIOD Buymnber 71 Poares aq [IM II] eUaodgns & oO} puodsar o} yseouIOD Surber Japlo ue syses JewoNNeY ‘aun JO potted proys Aaa & Joy SPOT sso} UTeyUTeUT ATUO ISedWLOT ‘AURIBFIUBTS “IseaLOD Aq apeur yaatuusisse ssaippe gy youve ox Aiquept Jswolsno pue sUIN ‘ajep ay} pJooe! YyOryM ‘s8o] [EUXOIN sUTeIUIEW IsROUIOg ‘psspuy ‘ssoq AyNMeprT O2 sessoIppe I IqI an UBD JsedUOD ‘k[BurpIosoy “jseowWoOD Aq So0(] O] PoUsisse oJom sasselppe gy ,SeOcf ‘SassaIppr (,.dI,.) [090}01g Jouraquy Tay Aq seoq smouy ATO YAVONTIOg ‘SUOTIBIOTA Mey TWOIOD 0} JoWIAIWY a posn S90C] VOUTS ‘S[PNPTATPUT aseqy JsuIEse yins ZuLIodt) Jeynduloo pue ssnqe pue prey Jayndwios ayy Aeut sQUONINe Tey? os tgeesaiiry J a1 ‘SUOTRITUNUMUOD IQuD IseIUIOD Juapuodsay (,.qST,) JOPIAOIg YdIAIOS JOUIOWUT Woy (,,890G,,) Seo] UYOr poyNUusprun jo sonnuepr syj WEI] 03 syoos ‘savIsqaM ajeApd snows Jo JOUMO oy] ‘FouONHAg ‘AJaaoosip JoJ uoTNNEd stp yYsnomy, NOLLONGOWINI T

SoLLLINGA SNOSHAd ATHISNOdSae AALENGOT OL LIAS

( ( ¢ ‘juopucdsey ¢ ‘ OTT SNOILYOINDIAINOD T1PVO LSVONOD ( A ( ‘souON Had

‘ON ( ( ‘OTIVAYND

NOISIAIC M¥T SIONITII ‘AINOOD UIV'TO ‘LS

LIND TYIOIGAL HIGENAML DL IO LANG LINDY ARAL NI

Case 2:12-cv-08333-ODW-JC Document 69-2 Filed 03/06/13 Page 94 of 104 Page ID #:1686

PEL.’ Sadeomep ur oyqisuadsar aq Apu Oy SHO Jo‘AQUApr ap] SulUTByaose Jo asodmd jos 2q3 Joy AYBAOISIP WI VdBsuUS 0} Soysia OYA AIJUA Jo DOsiad [e],, Aq pos aq Aeul sonnue pre suosiad aiqisuedsez Ajuapt 0} Jins s1oyeq Azeaoosip Jog uonned VY “pZZ a[MyY Lino; aulaidng sfouryy 0} qJuensind ArsAoostp Joy uornad & ysnomy sooq siy JO SoHUSpT sy Grego Aew JoMONTOg INGNNOUVY ‘DH ‘sang Aywapr 0} Aressooou uorjeuuoyUt STG) UTeyUIeUT pue dAJaSoAd ABUL JSLOTIOZ IBY OS JSBOUIOD 0} sRUsodgns am] ZuHIed 0} Joodsor YIM aouasse ay] Jo st aun ‘A[Zurproooy “ow JO JUNO LOYs e IO} MOSIed & OF ssoIpPpe g] Ue SeTaLIOS 01 AfessaoaU WOReULIOFU! Sy sttejax ATUO ‘Jaagmoy JseoMIOD ‘sood ay AFRUSpt Oo] souENNeY Aq peptaoid ssarppe gy OU} VSN UES suItOD ‘apeUl JWAUIUSISse SsorPpe qi Yeo Joy AJWUANT JsWLOISNO pue ‘awn ‘olep of) prooar yorym sBoy JRUISIUT sUTBIWIEUT JseoUIOD “Alranoe Fupnjoey ay} jo oh pues sjep oq] pue yseouIO Aq 90 Jet} 0) pausisse ssoappe q] onbrun ve Aq saoq any yo ova poyNuepr sjuase s,JouonNed ‘sonquopt ony .soeoq MOLY JOU seop JauENHeg ydnowmpy ‘suraysXs rajndu09 payoaqord $ 19uoNnag 0} ssodor pazuoutneun ures 0] splomssed paxzey pasm seoq ‘seoc] st jo yoea ysuiede Surredusey soynduios pue asnqe pue prey Joynduros oy sutreyo J]Quuonor sey IOUONA ‘uONNeY OU) UT pesaye sy ‘TUs]U0D JusuMTeyeiwe ynpe Ayred-prmy sinqinsip yey sttaysks sJayndwod soyeredo Jouonneg GNNOWOAOVA TWHALOVE =o ‘uonuad siy wed pynoys zM07 sip ‘A[surpsos0y ‘ssodimd sryj roy yooy redord & st A1aaogstp jins-aid 10} uotned 8 pue ssoc Jo Alnmopt ou urea] 0} paynua Arqeindsiput si Jouonnag ‘molsq pauletdxe sy "FJAsyt yOojOId OF yInsMeyz Yons Aue snsInd 0] soo sares AyoeIPSUWY JOU syns GuoduTE}

yainduros pue asnge pue prery reyndwoo amyng UT seog oleu JOUUED JOUONYEg ‘UOHeUMOyU! sty}

Case 2:12-cv-08333-ODW-JC Document 69-2 Filed 03/06/13 Page 95 o0f104 Page ID #:1687

‘TENPIAIPUT ots oy} JOU Ajay SOW ae JayoRY 24)

pur Jepjoy qunoose ayy aydwexs rape] og) Ut ‘SPIOM JOO uy ‘Ieyoely ayeudordde ays st uas-poSe-sdal[oo BIO puLgsny sf wYI—ssoursng s ravOTINA Jo sINjeU ay) UsAIs—ases oy} A[SHI] 20 S11 proyasnoy st) JO ayim on} ‘ardonexa 10g ‘st 29ppor JUNIO 91) SISYA WSENMOI UY “IeyoeTY ay) PUB Japloy JUMODB JY] Ty0q 2q 03 Afaxty Aran SI UCHOUtOD IoUNOIUT SsofaITM OMIVS B TIM Boze Seat] Om [UNPLArpaL Ue ‘goULISUT IO,

“Jappouy ynodoe Yoes JO sseuppe [oNUAD ssaoqy wIpayy pue ‘ssemppe [yeUs-9 ‘Oquinu 2uoqdo}93 ‘ssozppe OT, ,

“£0€ 12 PZ'A'N 799 ., ATWO otured & Jo s¥pojmouy $,rouorad ayy Jo stseq sy Uo ATapos,, pepnyoerd you st Araagostp yms-aid oui yem suteydxe ayvag ut ~m09 oy], ‘sassolppe GI ,se0q sy) Jo aeKe SI Wf asneoag ATdumts syoos YI UOWeULIOJUI aM Wo popnyosid jou st JaUOTNe ‘JeyLM.] “‘ROTTRUTUIIDOP STU) SYVUL OF SYSSS HW UOTecWOojUr SuAjrwepl oy) [Je sposu IouoNNeg _ oUes OG} pue 900 aq 10U 0} PeUNMUAap ae JoyORL FENIde st PUL JoQiIOSgNSs JaUIO]OY OY} SOULHSWOS VSnBd9q ,"UONeULIOJOT jeuonIppe sip seimbar souonneg “(9661 “1D “ddy WW) ZOE PZH'N 799 “duoD jotouvury yopaspg “a aywag BurytD) ,AjuO oureu e jo yuouuTeysaose sJouoyued aqy 0} payTUlt] sia St PTT B[NY ropun ArOAOdSIp ‘suOTseI30 Oso} UO ‘JeYI pue sured e A[duats uey] atou! oimmbar Avut juepuezep B JO VOL WSTINUApT oy) ‘UOTSeD90 UG,,) ZTE 1 PT A'N OSL “oudey uyor ‘saoq uMouyua aif Jo saureu oy] ysnf avy) s10M/ si UTeyoose Oo} popNue st souONNes yey) ,AIGept,, aU, ((68-S8T Ie ‘siOMMUTOD SoNIMTOD “PZZ “A PZ I PET FuNong) (.;saBeuep ur a]qQuiq 9q AvuI OM 340 JO AMUEPT ay} GuURLUIAISp O} LOJfa Ue UL WNsMel ze Tur s1oyaq Kranooary pany teduoa mod Jo save] YIM ‘Azur Ajqua 10 wuossed B yor Aq Joo) v sapraoid [p7z aray],,) (E661 1D ddy “IH) I9ET ‘9SET PZ'A'N 209 ‘Wndson s,yraquens ig a Yroy {(,-1UBROS aq Avox AssA0dar Woy wioy alto Jo Aynuapt ou} MOUy OU seop ing Ainfur pazayyns sey JHuleyd ve o1ay suoTenNis ur ayerdordde st asn s,pZz 21NY,,) (TOOT ID “ddy “TM ZLE ‘LOE PZ HN OSL “Aomjiny ay vung pun UBYLMON WOR UNG “A toukon uyor ‘yyTuretd au of MAMoUyUN ore s]UBPUSJep OG] Jo SOHMUSpr am)

‘ggeo qrasard amy Ul ayly ‘ust Aroaoostp HWas-aid Joy suonMed uer8 spmo0o SOUT "p77 “A PZ TL

Case 2:12-cv-08333-ODW-JC Document 69-2 Filed 03/06/13 Page 96 of 104 Page ID #:1688

dauounag 40f Lautony

9EES-ZS6-Z1E

20909 TI ‘o#¥9TYD

TOO WET

yaNS ATS" TN 7

(96v01Z9 ON Jeg) “bsg ‘Ayn “y Tred

Oth ag

Ag

Z10Z ‘91 JOqUIZAON -qaLvG YT] eaeny

‘panTuqns Ayrnposdsey

‘wontied snp) SuNUEIS Jopso we 19109 pinogs yNOD au} ‘suOSsvas SMOSIOF arp [Ie JO} NOISQTIONOD § ‘AL ‘{SBOWIOT WIOJZ SAQYUOp! S90 9y) Saryses Woy poliqnyod oq prnoys JouonieEd Aym uoseal a[qeyinbe 10 edo ou si aoqy, 1 pauuey avy oym afdood aq Jo soureu om AyUapT oy :asodind popusyur sit tog Axaaoostp ins-ald Joy uoQNad ot] Biisn st auoNNad ‘HWoys uy "AIQAOISIP yas-ard ayy opnyoaid 0} ydnous jou ose st ssaxppe gI ,S90q 243 JO dBpormouy alaw uayi ‘p7Z o[my Japun Arsacssip uns-srd spnyoord oF ysnous jou St sueR Ss JUEPUETAP at JO espo,Mouy SISUL Jy “WoY} IsUTeSe TinsmRy B BUG pu SWU

0} WonLULOM Jans UTM JovONYeg apraoid jou saop sassarppe dJ S90 ay} JO sspsyMOouyy

Case 2:12-cv-08333-ODW-JC Document 69-2 Filed 03/06/13 Page 97 of 104 Page ID #:1689

IsUOTHeg 10} AQUIONY 0Z00-S€Z (819)

97779 ‘TI ‘ATASTIOg

PONS UIEAE SSAA TITS

‘yd ‘uosduroyy

99 JauIsoy ‘wosineg axpog 98996 19# “Isttisoyy “y, MlASY

Walle “

Case 2:12-cv-08333-ODW-JC Document 69-2 Filed 03/06/13 Page 98 of 104 Page ID #:1690

I 10 ‘JENPIAIpUT BWes aU] 0} SATOSos ZU} Sassouppe q] aivalydnp Joy 10 “svouLoD Aq payjomuas jou st qeUt Ssomppe GI Ue JoJ 20} @ Aed 0} JoUCRNAY auNbar iseswas [yeYys 10U ‘uoMeULIOJUT povtiaodqns at) dutptaold jo soueape ul say e Aed 0} aonnegy armbar jou jyeys eso} ¢ “IgpIQ STG} 0} Juensmd pansst vusodqns oy) f yA Apdusod [feys seoUL0d “I9pPIO sty} yo Adoo & eusodgns yons Aur 03 youne Teys IUONHAY “UONNSg OY] OF YW HQIYXY UO YLLOF JOS SB oie (..dI,) [090101g JoUIAUT Ue pausisse jsEaUWOD WOYM O} (,,S90(],,) S9Oq HYOL yy "JO Youd JO} ssorppe (,.OWAL.) [ONUOD ssoooy BIpsy ‘SSoIPpe [IBW-9 “Isqlunu suoYdoya} ‘ssauppe ‘gumeu ony 9) UIT TaOnyeg aplaoid 01 yseowi0g Fuipueurutos vusodans k wT (,,)829010D,,) YT] suoneotunuuo; aque Jseoulos; uapuodsey sales ABU JouONTIag Zz ‘MEINVED Sf vonnedg ayy, 4 SMOT[OF Se CHOGNIGY INV dayaduo Aqaioy st yt ‘sastuiead oy) ul pastape Ainp asIMJalio Zulaq pure ‘joorayy woddas ut pally Me] Jo unpuesoursyy sy] ‘UONNE plus pamataar Suiaey Uno; ay} pue “(,woRNa|d,,) snnug pur suasieg ajqtsuodsay AjUapy 0} Ng aroyaq A1DAODSIC{ JO UOHNAY S ,JOUONNSg US NO; SI} aIOJOQ oMlod Furaey “ASQYD SIMLL

SHLLLEING GNV SNOSUdd A THISNOdSaa

AALLNAG! OL LIAS FAOTA AVAAOOSIC WOU NOILILGd DNIINVAD WAGUuo

(

( ‘Juspuadsay

(

‘ ‘OTT ‘SNOILYOINIAINOD FTd V3 LSVOWOO

( ‘A

( ‘QUOLINIg LibYyUle( ‘ON (

( ‘OTIVAVND

NOISIAIG AVI

SIONITT SAENNOD UVTI WES LIgOwIo TVIOIGAL HLALLINSML AHL JO LYNOS LINDUIS AHL NI

Case 2:12-cv-08333-ODW-JC Document 69-2. Filed 03/06/13 Page 99 of 104 Page ID #:1691

aDdnf LANOD LINO

“E102 jo kep

SIUy SIOUTTTY “MUROD AeTD VG ye siequreyD Ul GaYACYO UNV HNO

‘YONI SH UT UOT 39s Se SPYSII s}t JoIOJUS puy

399}0Jd ued JovorNeg Os ssoq UMOUAUN sy? BulAjNUapt Jo ssodind oy Joy ySeOUIOT) UO padres Buaodgns 2 0} asucdsai ul pasojfosip uOneULIojsur dq} asn ATUO ABUE JoWONTIg "bp

‘IOUONTeg 0} paplaodd st uoMeuIosur parusodqns amy Joye

yseowor) Aq podieys 9q 0) pasodord yunowr ay3 jo ssaua_qeuoseal ou} Suipresar Jouonhag pue

yseatuas) Kaamzeq sayndsip Aue aalosal yJeys Ln auG ‘Aresseoatl JJ “sisuz0jsn3 $11 AyTOU 01 S1s00

[ewlazwr $.jSeIUIO Joy 10 enprAIpul onbrun e Jo eursu oy aptaosd jou saop yey} ssoIppe GI UE IO}

cee

ase 2:12-cv-08333-ODW-JC Document 69-2 Filed 03/06/13 Page 100 of 104 Page ID

#:1692 9¢ eed - syiqnyxy Aldoy |eyuawaddng (onsawiog) Auedwiod Ayiqel paywiy - uoyeuwe LLOz/Zz/e | (oysewog) Auedwog Ayer] payury - uoyNjossig yo eonoN LLOv/ezize ee et aWeN ssauisng (oyseuiog) Auedwog Ager payury ~ OL0Z/ZO/0L (aljsawog) Auedwog Ayiqer paywry - Burpy peuibuE OLOZ/ZO/01 | Asoisiy 6uryi4

| AOMSIH jemauay ALOYsIH Burpy

:

ZOVSS NW Sijodeeuuny Wily MET eUdly 0/9 006 #35 UIE S 08 SSOJPpy SIJO aAyNoexg [ediouu,

Ysn - ZOPSS NW Sijodeouuiyy 006 #38 48S 08 Aguoow uely paplaoid suoy (jeuondo) Jebeueyy (s)usby posajsibey vsn ZOvSS NW SIdW Wty MET] eUdTY 3D SAI 006# 23S 438 S 08 CLOCILEIZ | SSOIPPY 9DWIQ poieysiBey :ayeq ang jemeusy 9AI}OeU] OL02/Z0/04 snjeys ajyeq Burjiy B]JOSOUUIIY 2-067 LOY uoHoIpsunr ewop Jaquinn e]t-4 a2ze (94sawog) Auedwog Ayiqer paywry SINIEIS NW edAL ssauisng

DTT “dIDDW WEN SSeUlsng ejosouUI

eg enero Comin « oy) | synsay ydeas 02 yDeg » S[feleq P4ossy ssoulsng

SSUI[IJ SsouIsng « yorees

(sBurl4/sseursng/) s6uryi4 (yoreas/ssouisng/) ydieas (/) 3WOoH

Case 2:12-cv-§8 Mpcument 69-2 Filed 03/06/13 Page 101 o0f104 Page ID #:1693

uodag

‘oyep SWS OY} UO dUEPIsal SITY je Yo] BUIPIOeI [Iewool0A B Jo pastiduros

BoseAtN a0f WOLF S[If DUOI}Oe[9 Ue poAlooal [ ‘ET OZ ‘g Adeniqoy ‘Aepiy uO ‘7 “UlaIEY paeqiiosap se Armbut sfqeuoseay Jaye

powo} Jaljeq pue UOTeUMOJUI UOdn ‘palsUpI Os JUD}Xa SY} 0} ‘10 UlaIay YOY Jes

SIOYeU OY) JO ospayMouy [euosied uo paseq st UOTeIe[OSp sIy) pue “eoseAeN sof

JO} plodsas JO AoWIOYL We] “VIWIOF]ED JO JLMNSIG WIOYVION a) JOJ LIND JOLNSIG

OY} SIOJaQ PUB BIUVIOJI[ED JO s1eI1g 9Y} UT soNOeId 0} pesusol] A[np AowIoNe ue ure | 7

O'TIVNVY SVTIOHDOIN HO NOLLVaV Toad

"sjuepuayoq

VOSVAVN dor AAQAOISIG, JO AVIG 1OF UOTOFAL/OUIL],

Ud}10YS 0} WOOP 0} uoYIsoddg "A UI O][VURY Se[OYIIN Jo UoNVABpPIg ured

QINA-96£70-A9-Z1:€ “ON 988) “OTT ‘SONIGTOH AV

VINYOSITVO JO LORLLSIG NYSH LYON AHL WOr LYNOOD LOMILSIC SHLIVLS GALINA

BOSBARN BOP JUBPUsjec] Jo} Aoulony

WOd sd JOME]OT[BURIM) oI seu ELOS-EES (LEB) ON XE

ITOv - €0L (TE) ON suOYdaya],

90066 VO “Yea1D Jepinog

ABA poomsog TLE

OLOSLZ# Me] ye AouIONY ‘oreuey sejoyoIN

Case 2:12-cv-08333-ODW-JC Document 69-2 Filed 03/06/13 Page 102 of 104 Page ID #:1694

"OHS GoM Woo'AoeMdysIZom sj uo “ouy ‘Me’T epuselg Joy porsl] Joquinu ot) st aaoge eBessour oy} ul paljnuapr saquinu suoydayay ouL 9 « NOA YULYT, “OXOPY SI Jaquinu sousiaze1 NOX “OPE -O8€ (008) 12 payovar aq Wes oA\ “You sn ]yeo ‘sty OyI]T ose B YIM pojeroosse SI Jey} OWIT] pue asuadxe ay} proav 0} ueM NO< JI asoddns J ‘mouwy nox ‘T[e9 yornb ® NOA dAI8 0} sn payse ysnf Justo Mo ‘ouweu INO ppe oO} IUTeTdwOo sy) SurApipow pue pieMmioj SuIAOU! 0} Jord ‘puy ‘Ie Jo se yUawoeITe JUOUIATES B OUT paraqus 1 Usary om “uBatU ] ‘Yeokvwm'puy jo ied ev ole nod yey) yNsMe] JUaWASULYUT qYSI1Adoo OY} YIM Op 01 peYy YoryM nod payieuw am ssoye] Jo afdnoo ev ynoge [vo B nod SuIAIs dnoip meq Aoesg-nuy “yn ‘s.jf “OuTAOs J0J st oessour siy} ‘yn ‘sox, ‘a]qissod se aywinoow se oq 0} paloAvopua Avy J ‘[eWadI0A g AreNIgey ay} JO uoTdiosuey euosied Aur syuasoidas SuLMoTJO} ayy, tg ‘IasuLyUl ATI] B se ,.poyeurutye,, ATsnoraoid S@M Jey} [eNPIAIPUL Ue oWeU o} jUTeTdWIOD sy} pusWe 0} BuTyses Io/pue ‘aseo SITY} UI JWepUajop oY) JOU SI Jey) [ENPIAIPU! Ue Wo] JUSWIOTes BuTyVes sI seo sTy) Ul PSATOAUT AT[BWAIOJ JOU SI Jey Way Mey ev AYM BurpseBa.1 uoMeUIOJUT OU peprAoid SqqID “Al “oulAor Juasaidas jou pip | wy) BuNOU puossg ‘uoNeUeTdxe BuNsonbar SqqID Nelg 0} ]rewss10A ot Jo Adoo wv ques | ‘ETOT ‘g Areniqay ‘Aeplg uC “LY ‘MET Bpudl {/Iorotusuey 3901S JOJ jeBojered se jor siy Ul zINJ IAL YUM suOTIesIaAUOD sed snosawMNU WO] Sd10A .ZINT “A JO UotUsoss1 AU uO paseq sI Joljoq sul, ‘ZINT WR SI SBeSSU [IBWISOIOA dU} Ul Suryeads yenplArpul oy} ‘Jol[oq pue uoMeULOsUI uodA 9 ‘ysonbor uodn yinoo au}

0} 1 aplAoid uvo pue adessour oy Jo Adoo otuoNseTa Ue poUtejol sARY J ‘aSessour

jeWIad10A ay} JO wordiosuen yeuosiod Aw syuasaider ‘motaq ‘¢ ydeiSereg

Case 2:12-cv-08333-ODW-JC Document 69-2 Filed 03/06/13 Page 103 of 104 Page ID #:1695

CNG” SB OJOIOY psyoRye splejop Aju ayeIg Jo Arejo1N9g BPEASN SY] JO MOIAaI & UO paseqg SI Jol][aq SIY], “Wel[d JoloulsueH] 9[90}¢ JoUNOJ B “ou, YgA Aq pasn Ajsnotacid Os[e SBM SSoIppe BSaIOYL PIA “A Tesh oy} Joljeq pue uoyeuojut uodqQ -¢] "C2 NQIUXY se ojo1oy poxouue SI Woda sty Jo Adoo y ‘9[99}§ “sJA[ JO] Yorwas .ssoippe ised, wod"jeUIsa|doad UO peseq sSIMONI]T SI joljaq Sy, ‘“BUuoZITy ‘xIUs0Yg Ul sANIG esordy], BIA “A TESp Ie peat] A[snotaard osye sjaaig ower ‘Joljoq pue uoneunoyu uody ‘zy "e UQINX” se Ojoloy poxouue st yodad [Inj s,Yysreunfes ‘yy Jo Adoo V “Ysivunjesg A pue ssarippe ou} Jo “woo-yeuIssjdoed ysnom) yoreas ,.ssorppe jsed,, e uodn paseq SI Jaljaq SIU, “ZEQSg ‘euOZITY xIUD0Yg UT SALIC eSarOUT, BIA “F Zesp ie peal Ajsnoraaid ysieunjeg Auoy, ‘Jarjoq pue uorewsoyur uodQ = “T] ‘UlaJOY JoYLIN] paeqiiosap se “1iedoog uely snolaysAw ay] pue ATTWIRJ S.9]291G UYOL YIM sUOTIEIOOSse payUsUINoOp sey pUe ‘JsIxe sap YsIeUNTeS Auoyjuy Jo Avo], peweu yenpiarpur ue Jerjeq pue uoreudosyur uodn “aAsmozy = ‘Q] "a]901§ WYOL JO SSUIP[OH[ TV YIM payeloosse SI J8U] ..YSiey] yes,, oweU yeNjoe ay} YIM yenpraipur Aue jo oleme jou We | 6 ‘JOLNSIP SIG} UT Sasvo JOYJO SNOJAUINU SB [[aM SB ‘OSD STU} UI g “ON JOT Ul SsuIploxyy JV Jo ...OUMO,, UB se PsljNUEpT [eNPIAIpUT ot st ..YSIePL Yes,, °g HSUVW ITVS "OSB9 SIU] WO JUSUWIISULUI Jo suoneSaT|e oy} Surpresai

Jyuule}g Woy siayey Jord 0} spuodsazioo saoqe pajou sJaquNu soUeIEJe1 oy], *}

Case 2:12-cv-08333-ODW-JC Document 69-2 Filed 03/06/13 Page 104 of 104 Page ID #:1696

OTJeURY SBTOYDSIN OfeUeY “Y SeOUSIN 75/

“‘BIUIOH]ED Ysoip Jepinog ut “ET Oz “Arensqay jo Aep mit SY} UO payndaxe ST UOTBIB[IeC] SITY] JY] pu JDaLIOD pu on) st SUIOsII0]

oY} Jey} BIUIOJTeD JO se1g BY] JO smey oy Jopun Aimfied Jo Ayeuod azapun aiepoop |

"C NQIYXY se ojoIeYy poxouue ae YyoIym Jo Adoo e ‘sireiap Aqua aqeig Jo Arey9109¢ BPBASN 9Y} JO MIAO B UO paseq ISIMOYI] SI JOl9q SIU[, “SSoIppe BSOIOUL], BI[LA WEY TECH SY} YIM poleloosse osimay]] pue “ouy YA JO Joinseol], pue jwepissig

oy} “eye Joy ‘se palyuept sem sodoog uepy ‘Joljeq pue uoneunoyut uodq = ‘yy