Case 2:12-cv-08333-ODW-JC Document9 Filed 10/09/12 Page 1of2 Page ID #:69

—_

oOo Fe NY DBD A FSF W WNW

Brett L. Gibbs, Esq. (SBN 251000)
Of Counsel to Prenda Law Inc.

38 Miller Avenue, oar

Mill Valley, CA 94941
415-325-5900 ;
blgibbs@wefightpiracy.com

Attorney for Plaintiff

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

INGENUITY13 LLC, Case No. 2:12-cv-8333-SVW(PJWx)
Plaintiff,
Vv. ORDER GRANTING
LAINTIFF’S EX PARTE
JOHN DOE, APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO

TAKE EXPEDITED DISCOVERY

Defendant.

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR LEAVE
TO TAKE EXPEDITED DISCOVERY

The Court has reviewed the Complaint with attached Exhibits, Plaintiff's Ex
Parte Application for Leave to Take Expedited Discovery and all the papers filed in
connection with the motion, and relevant case law. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED that Plaintiff's Ex Parte Application for Leave to Take Discovery is
GRANTED;; it is further

ORDERED that Plaintiff may immediately serve Rule 45 subpoena(s) to
identify John Doe associated with the Internet Protocol (“IP”) address listed in the
Complaint, limited to the following categories of entities and information:

From Internet Service Provider (ISP) identified in Plaintiff's Ex Parte

Application for Leave to Take Expedited Discovery and any other entity

identified as a provider of Internet services to John Doe in response to a

subpoena or as a result of ongoing BitTorrent activity monitoring:

Case 2:12-cv-08333-ODW-JC Document9 Filed 10/09/12 Page 2.of 2 Page ID #:70

—

o oOo NTN BD A BP WH WH

information sufficient to identify John Doe associated with the IP address

listed in the Complaint, including name, current (and permanent) address,

telephone number, e-mail address, and Media Access Control address; it

is further

ORDERED any information disclosed to the Plaintiff in response to a Rule 45
subpoena may be used by the Plaintiff solely for the purpose of protecting Plaintiff's
rights as set forth in its Complaint; it is further

ORDERED that Plaintiff and any entity which receives a subpoena shall confer,
if necessary, with respect to the issue of payment for the information requested in the
subpoena or for resolution of IP addresses which are not controlled by such entity,
duplicate IP addresses that resolve to the same individual, other IP addresses that do
not provide the name and other information requested of a unique individual, or for
the entity’s internal costs to notify its customers; it is further

ORDERED that any entity which receives a subpoena and elects to charge for
the costs of production shall provide a billing summary and any cost reports that serve
as a basis for such billing summary and any costs claimed by such entity; it is further

ORDERED that Plaintiff shall serve a copy of this Order along with any
subpoenas issued pursuant to this Order; it is further

- ORDERED that if any entity subpoenaed pursuant to this Order wishes to move

to quash the subpoena, it must do so before the return date of the subpoena, which
shall be 30 days from the date of service;

Finally, it is ORDERED that the subpoenaed entity shall preserve any

subpoenaed information pending the resolution of any timely-filed motion to quash.

pargp: Oct ~9 202 Ltitek. ane

United States Magistrate Judge

2
~{PROROSEBTORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR EXPEDITED DISCOVERY No. 2:12-cv-8333-SV W(PJWx)